An Antiwar Activist Searches for a Way to Support a Strike on Syria

Like many Democrats, Iraq opponent and Vietnam protestor Gerald Connolly now wants to back President Obama’s call to attack.

Protesters against U.S. intervention in Syria march during a demonstration in Boston, Saturday, Aug. 31, 2013. 
National Journal
Ben Terris
Sept. 5, 2013, 3:55 a.m.

It was 1968. His her­oes Bobby Kennedy and Mar­tin Luth­er King Jr. were dead. The Vi­et­nam War raged on. Ger­ald Con­nolly, a nat­ive of Bo­ston, now a House mem­ber from Vir­gin­ia, walked to Fen­way Park to listen to folk and blues mu­sic from Pete See­ger and B.B. King, and to listen as pres­id­en­tial can­did­ate Eu­gene Mc­Carthy pledged to end the war if elec­ted. A self-de­scribed “avid act­ive op­pon­ent of the Vi­et­nam War,” Con­nolly counseled con­scien­tious ob­ject­ors on their rights and op­tions. Hear­ing Mc­Carthy speak gave him just a glim­mer of hope. Then, he nev­er made it out of the primary.

“When Nix­on won, it was tre­mend­ously dis­ap­point­ing,” Con­nolly says. “When we learned his secret plan to end the war was to ex­pand it, that’s something that I’ll nev­er for­get.”

All this is to say that Con­nolly has long been an an­ti­war Demo­crat. But now, after rev­el­a­tions that Syr­ia’s Bashar al-As­sad used chem­ic­al weapons against his own people, Con­nolly finds him­self be­set with “one of the gravest” votes he’s had to make since 2008, when he was elec­ted to the House from his Fair­fax-area dis­trict. Con­nolly must de­cide wheth­er he can sup­port cast­ing a vote that could launch mis­siles in­to a coun­try that has not been de­clared an en­emy of the United States. Vot­ing no means go­ing against his pres­id­ent — the man whose can­did­acy spurred the turnout that helped pro­pel Con­nolly to of­fice.

“The ideo­lo­gic­al base of our party is strongly an­ti­war, and an­ti­mil­it­ary in­ter­ven­tion,” Con­nolly told Na­tion­al Journ­al on Wed­nes­day as de­bate over Pres­id­ent Obama’s re­quest raged on Cap­it­ol Hill. “And there are reas­ons for that.”

But Con­nolly, like many Demo­crats at the mo­ment, isn’t a def­in­ite “no” when it comes to the vote. While he says he re­mains un­de­cided, he and Demo­crat Rep. Chris Van Hol­len of Mary­land are in the midst of draft­ing a res­ol­u­tion for a lim­ited strike in Syr­ia. He says he won’t sup­port any­thing “too broad” or that could put boots on the ground, but he feels it’s pos­sible that do­ing noth­ing at all could be the worst pos­sib­il­ity. “There are cer­tainly risks and wor­ries about do­ing something, but are they big enough to pre­clude me from do­ing any­thing?” Con­nolly wondered out loud in a phone in­ter­view. “That’s the struggle.”

And such is the con­flict for many Demo­crats as they head to a vote next week on the mat­ter. A new poll from The Wash­ing­ton Post and ABC News found that six in 10 Amer­ic­ans dis­ap­prove of a strike on Syr­ia. The num­ber among pro­gress­ives is much high­er still at 73 per­cent op­pos­ing, ac­cord­ing to the Pro­gress­ive Change Cam­paign Com­mit­tee. And yet, with Obama call­ing for ac­tion, many Demo­crats are look­ing for a ra­tionale to come on­board and act as a team play­er.

Much of the anti-at­tack sen­ti­ment comes from a pub­lic that has been de­scribed ad nau­seum as “war weary” in re­cent weeks. But Con­nolly says he is try­ing not to think about the wars in Ir­aq and Afgh­anistan when mak­ing his de­cision.

“It’s easy for people to make an ana­logy there,” he says. “But I’ve been try­ing to make the case that that’s a com­pletely false ana­logy, though it’s an un­der­stand­able one. It’s fresh in our minds, and we feel burned, but it’s not the same thing.”

It’s im­port­ant to Con­nolly that he fig­ure out a way to draw that dis­tinc­tion, for he be­lieves the ar­gu­ments for go­ing to war in Ir­aq were “com­pletely spe­cious. Either wish­ful think­ing or en­tirely fab­ric­ated.” With re­gard to Syr­ia, Con­nolly is con­fid­ent that chem­ic­al weapons were in fact used. And per­haps biggest for him is his con­vic­tion that Obama is “truly a re­luct­ant war­ri­or,” when it comes to Syr­ia.

“This isn’t a case of a pres­id­ent want­ing to go to war,” he says. “And that’s a big dif­fer­ence.”

Con­nolly is no stranger to for­eign policy. The gradu­ate of the Kennedy School of Gov­ern­ment at Har­vard worked on the Sen­ate For­eign Re­la­tions Com­mit­tee for a dec­ade. His wealthy North­ern Vir­gin­ia dis­trict is home to the largest num­ber of fed­er­al con­tract­ors and gov­ern­ment work­ers in the na­tion. But what would his col­lege-age self say to him now, see­ing an older man not only vot­ing to sanc­tion a mis­sile strike but help­ing to draft a res­ol­u­tion to per­mit it. Con­nolly likes to think he would un­der­stand. “Even when I was protest­ing the Vi­et­nam War, I al­ways made a dis­tinc­tion between be­ing a pa­ci­fist and an an­ti­war act­iv­ist,” he says. “I was nev­er a pa­ci­fist. No war is de­sir­able, but I’d re­cog­nize that some­times ac­tion is ne­ces­sary.”

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4419) }}

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
6 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
7 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×