NEW YORK

Three the Hard Way

Three new polls all show de Blasio flirting with 40 percent.

Sept. 9, 2013, 7:27 a.m.

Three new polls of the Demo­crat­ic New York City may­or­al primary show Pub­lic Ad­voc­ate Bill de Bla­sio (D) with a com­mand­ing lead. The trio of polls in­dic­ate that de Bla­sio has a chance of win­ning the 40% ne­ces­sary to avoid a run­off, while former Comp­troller Bill Thompson (D) and City Coun­cil Speak­er Christine Quinn (D) are in a battle for second place.

A Quin­nipi­ac Uni­versity poll (Sept. 6-8, 782 LVs; +/- 3.5%) shows de Bla­sio lead­ing Thompson, 39-25%. Quinn fin­ishes third with 18%, while former Rep. An­thony Wein­er (D) re­ceives 6%. Comp­troller John Liu (D) garners 4%, and former Coun­cil­man Sal Al­banese (D) re­ceives 1%. (re­lease)

In a new WN­BC-TV/Wall Street Journ­al/Mar­ist poll (Sept. 3-6; 556 LVs; +/- 4.2%), de Bla­sio leads with 36%, while Thompson and Quinn are tied with 20% apiece. Wein­er re­ceives 7%0, and Liu garners 5%. None of the oth­er can­did­ates tested re­ceive more than 1%. (re­lease)

In a Pub­lic Policy Polling poll (D) (IVR) (Sept. 7-8; 683 LVs; +/- 3.8%), de Bla­sio re­ceives 38%, fol­lowed by Thompson at 19% and Quinn at 13%. Wein­er re­ceives 9%, while Liu fin­ishes at 5%. None of the oth­er can­did­ates tested re­ceive more than 3 per­cent. (re­lease)

De Bla­sio has a sol­id shot at win­ning the primary out­right on Tues­day. If he fails to reach 40 per­cent, Thompson ap­pears more likely than Quinn to fin­ish second and ad­vance to the run­off. Polling shows that de Bla­sio would be­gin the run­off cam­paign with a large lead over either Demo­crat, al­though Thompson may have a bet­ter chance of cut­ting in­to his ad­vant­age giv­en Quinn’s high neg­at­ives.

BLOOMBERG BASHES BILL: Dur­ing an in­ter­view with New York Magazine, May­or Mi­chael Bloomberg (I) in­ter­rup­ted a ques­tion about de Bla­sio that clas­si­fied his bid as a “class-war­fare cam­paign.” Bloomberg said: “Class-war­fare and ra­cist. … Well, no, no, I mean he’s mak­ing an ap­peal us­ing his fam­ily to gain sup­port. I think it’s pretty ob­vi­ous to any­one watch­ing what he’s been do­ing. I do not think he him­self is ra­cist. It’s com­par­able to me point­ing out I’m Jew­ish in at­tract­ing the Jew­ish vote. You tail­or mes­sages to your audi­ences and ad­dress is­sues you think your audi­ence cares about.”

Cap­it­al New York’s Pay­barah writes: “Bloomberg is fam­ously un­pre­dict­able in in­ter­views. But though his aides got the quote amended in the on­line ver­sion of the story, it hasn’t done much to lessen the polit­ic­al im­pact of the com­ment. For de Bla­sio, who is lead­ing in the latest pub­lic opin­ion polls, the rhet­or­ic from Bloomberg is a gift, giv­ing him one more talk­ing point as he seeks to drive up his sup­port among Demo­crat­ic voters by high­light­ing his con­nec­tions, through his fam­ily, to the out­er bor­oughs, pub­lic schools and the Afric­an-Amer­ic­an com­munity.”

“Wherever Mr. de Bla­sio went on Sunday, he tried to cap­it­al­ize on the may­or’s com­ments.” (New York Times)

FI­NAL GOP DE­BATE: Former MTA chair­man Joe Lhota (R) and bil­lion­aire John Cat­sima­tid­is (R) “made their fi­nal pitch to Re­pub­lic­an voters on Sunday, clash­ing at a de­bate on WN­BC-TV in which Mr. Lhota sought to leave the im­pres­sion Mr. Cat­sima­tid­is was not a ser­i­ous can­did­ate, and Mr. Cat­sima­tid­is ar­gued that Mr. Lhota was a mean­spir­ited tech­no­crat who lacked big ideas.”

Cat­sima­tid­is said he had a “love factor with the minor­it­ies. … They all give me hugs.”

Lhota said: “I’m not the anti-kit­ten can­did­ate. We have thou­sands of cats — lit­er­ally thou­sands of cats — that are in the sub­way sys­tem every single day, day and night, scur­ry­ing across the tracks, and they don’t get killed.” (New York Times)

What We're Following See More »
1.5 MILLION MORE TUNED IN FOR TRUMP
More People Watched Trump’s Acceptance Speech
16 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Hillary Clinton hopes that television ratings for the candidates' acceptance speeches at their respective conventions aren't foreshadowing of similar results at the polls in November. Preliminary results from the networks and cable channels show that 34.9 million people tuned in for Donald Trump's acceptance speech while 33.3 million watched Clinton accept the Democratic nomination. However, it is still possible that the numbers are closer than these ratings suggest: the numbers don't include ratings from PBS or CSPAN, which tend to attract more Democratic viewers.

Source:
×