NEW YORK

Three the Hard Way

Three new polls all show de Blasio flirting with 40 percent.

Add to Briefcase
Sept. 9, 2013, 7:27 a.m.

Three new polls of the Demo­crat­ic New York City may­or­al primary show Pub­lic Ad­voc­ate Bill de Bla­sio (D) with a com­mand­ing lead. The trio of polls in­dic­ate that de Bla­sio has a chance of win­ning the 40% ne­ces­sary to avoid a run­off, while former Comp­troller Bill Thompson (D) and City Coun­cil Speak­er Christine Quinn (D) are in a battle for second place.

A Quin­nipi­ac Uni­versity poll (Sept. 6-8, 782 LVs; +/- 3.5%) shows de Bla­sio lead­ing Thompson, 39-25%. Quinn fin­ishes third with 18%, while former Rep. An­thony Wein­er (D) re­ceives 6%. Comp­troller John Liu (D) garners 4%, and former Coun­cil­man Sal Al­banese (D) re­ceives 1%. (re­lease)

In a new WN­BC-TV/Wall Street Journ­al/Mar­ist poll (Sept. 3-6; 556 LVs; +/- 4.2%), de Bla­sio leads with 36%, while Thompson and Quinn are tied with 20% apiece. Wein­er re­ceives 7%0, and Liu garners 5%. None of the oth­er can­did­ates tested re­ceive more than 1%. (re­lease)

In a Pub­lic Policy Polling poll (D) (IVR) (Sept. 7-8; 683 LVs; +/- 3.8%), de Bla­sio re­ceives 38%, fol­lowed by Thompson at 19% and Quinn at 13%. Wein­er re­ceives 9%, while Liu fin­ishes at 5%. None of the oth­er can­did­ates tested re­ceive more than 3 per­cent. (re­lease)

De Bla­sio has a sol­id shot at win­ning the primary out­right on Tues­day. If he fails to reach 40 per­cent, Thompson ap­pears more likely than Quinn to fin­ish second and ad­vance to the run­off. Polling shows that de Bla­sio would be­gin the run­off cam­paign with a large lead over either Demo­crat, al­though Thompson may have a bet­ter chance of cut­ting in­to his ad­vant­age giv­en Quinn’s high neg­at­ives.

BLOOMBERG BASHES BILL: Dur­ing an in­ter­view with New York Magazine, May­or Mi­chael Bloomberg (I) in­ter­rup­ted a ques­tion about de Bla­sio that clas­si­fied his bid as a “class-war­fare cam­paign.” Bloomberg said: “Class-war­fare and ra­cist. … Well, no, no, I mean he’s mak­ing an ap­peal us­ing his fam­ily to gain sup­port. I think it’s pretty ob­vi­ous to any­one watch­ing what he’s been do­ing. I do not think he him­self is ra­cist. It’s com­par­able to me point­ing out I’m Jew­ish in at­tract­ing the Jew­ish vote. You tail­or mes­sages to your audi­ences and ad­dress is­sues you think your audi­ence cares about.”

Cap­it­al New York’s Pay­barah writes: “Bloomberg is fam­ously un­pre­dict­able in in­ter­views. But though his aides got the quote amended in the on­line ver­sion of the story, it hasn’t done much to lessen the polit­ic­al im­pact of the com­ment. For de Bla­sio, who is lead­ing in the latest pub­lic opin­ion polls, the rhet­or­ic from Bloomberg is a gift, giv­ing him one more talk­ing point as he seeks to drive up his sup­port among Demo­crat­ic voters by high­light­ing his con­nec­tions, through his fam­ily, to the out­er bor­oughs, pub­lic schools and the Afric­an-Amer­ic­an com­munity.”

“Wherever Mr. de Bla­sio went on Sunday, he tried to cap­it­al­ize on the may­or’s com­ments.” (New York Times)

FI­NAL GOP DE­BATE: Former MTA chair­man Joe Lhota (R) and bil­lion­aire John Cat­sima­tid­is (R) “made their fi­nal pitch to Re­pub­lic­an voters on Sunday, clash­ing at a de­bate on WN­BC-TV in which Mr. Lhota sought to leave the im­pres­sion Mr. Cat­sima­tid­is was not a ser­i­ous can­did­ate, and Mr. Cat­sima­tid­is ar­gued that Mr. Lhota was a mean­spir­ited tech­no­crat who lacked big ideas.”

Cat­sima­tid­is said he had a “love factor with the minor­it­ies. … They all give me hugs.”

Lhota said: “I’m not the anti-kit­ten can­did­ate. We have thou­sands of cats — lit­er­ally thou­sands of cats — that are in the sub­way sys­tem every single day, day and night, scur­ry­ing across the tracks, and they don’t get killed.” (New York Times)

What We're Following See More »
WITH LIVE BLOGGING
Trump Deposition Video Is Online
7 hours ago
STAFF PICKS

The video of Donald Trump's deposition in his case against restaurateur Jeffrey Zakarian is now live. Slate's Jim Newell and Josh Voorhees are live-blogging it while they watch.

Source:
SOUND LEVEL AFFECTED
Debate Commission Admits Issues with Trump’s Mic
8 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.

Source:
TRUMP VS. CHEFS
Trump Deposition Video to Be Released
9 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."

Source:
A CANDIDATE TO BE ‘PROUD’ OF
Chicago Tribune Endorses Gary Johnson
12 hours ago
THE LATEST

No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."

NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
×