Full Speed Ahead

Thompson resists calls to concede to de Blasio.

Add to Briefcase
Sept. 13, 2013, 7:36 a.m.

After hold­ing a closed-door meet­ing with his key aides and sup­port­ers on Thursday night, former Comp­troller Bill Thompson (D) “again re­fused to con­cede a run­off un­til more votes are coun­ted.” Thompson: “It con­tin­ues to be­come clear­er and clear­er that there are tens of thou­sands of votes that are out there. We be­lieve that the votes should be coun­ted.”

Thompson de­cided to press for­ward “des­pite mount­ing pres­sure by oth­er uni­on of­fi­cials, Demo­crat­ic lead­ers — and even some of his former sup­port­ers — to drop his bid.”

Pub­lic Ad­voc­ate Bill de Bla­sio (D) “fin­ished Tues­day night hold­ing 40.3 per­cent of the vote, with 99 per­cent of pre­cincts re­port­ing — just a hair over the 40 per­cent threshold needed for him to avoid a run­off. But ac­cord­ing to the latest Board of Elec­tion tally, there are nearly 80,000 pa­per bal­lots yet to be coun­ted, in­clud­ing ab­sent­ee, mil­it­ary and emer­gency bal­lots filled out by voters whose names could not be found on the rolls.”

The Board of Elec­tion was sched­uled to “be­gin the stand­ard pro­cess of re-can­vassing vot­ing ma­chine totals” on Fri­day morn­ing, al­though the board won’t be­gin count­ing pa­per bal­lots un­til Monday. Thompson “has un­til Fri­day at mid­night to with­draw his name from the run­off, or he will ap­pear on the bal­lot”“no mat­ter what”“if Mr. de Bla­sio falls be­low 40 per­cent.” (Politick­

De Bla­sio needs roughly a third of the out­stand­ing bal­lots to clinch the nom­in­a­tion without a run­off. (New York Times)

DE BLA­SIO SHOWS OFF SUP­PORT: At a rally on the steps of City Hall on Thursday, de Bla­sio “was joined at the event by some erstwhile sup­port­ers of” City Coun­cil Speak­er Christine Quinn (D), who fin­ished third in the primary, and “at least two sup­port­ers of” of Thompson. (Cap­it­al New York)

At a press con­fer­ence on Thursday, Quinn said: “Im go­ing to en­thu­si­ast­ic­ally sup­port the Demo­crat­ic can­did­ate. And I think it’s clear to most folks that that per­son is Bill de Bla­sio.” (Wall Street Journ­al)

ON SECOND THOUGHT: May­or Mi­chael Bloomberg (I) “said on Fri­day morn­ing that he had de­cided not to make an en­dorse­ment in the gen­er­al elec­tion for may­or, a sur­prise an­nounce­ment in a cam­paign that has be­come something of a ref­er­en­dum on his leg­acy.” The an­nounce­ment ended weeks of spec­u­la­tion that Bloomberg might de­cide to en­dorse MTA chair­man Joe Lhota (R) be­cause of the ex­tent to which de Bla­sio has framed his cam­paign as a re­buke of Bloomberg’s policies. Bloomberg: “I don’t want to do any­thing that com­plic­ates it for the next may­or, and that’s one of the reas­ons I’ve de­cided I’m just not go­ing to make an en­dorse­ment in the race.” (New York Times)

GET­TING STAR­TED: Lhota and de Bla­sio “em­braced the role of fierce rivals on Thursday, dis­play­ing the testy ten­or and deep ideo­lo­gic­al di­vide of a gen­er­al elec­tion match­up even” as the Demo­crat­ic primary res­ults re­main un­of­fi­cial. Lhota prom­ised a “take­down” of de Bla­sio, ac­cus­ing the Demo­crat of di­vid­ing the city with his “tale of two cit­ies” cam­paign theme and of pro­mot­ing “a re­pu­di­ation of everything great that’s happened over the last 20 years.”

“It did not take long for Mr. de Bla­sio to fire back. Speak­ing at a cam­paign rally with labor sup­port­ers in Brook­lyn, he said his crit­ics had failed to ad­dress the most ser­i­ous eco­nom­ic is­sues fa­cing the city.” De Bla­sio: “Ac­cept­ance of in­equal­ity, turn­ing the oth­er way when there’s in­equal­ity, that’s not an Amer­ic­an value, and that’s not the val­ues of the city of New York.” (New York Times)
Kev­in Bren­nan

What We're Following See More »
Republican Polling Shows Close Race
Roundup: National Polling Remains Inconsistent
1 hours ago

The national polls, once again, tell very different stories: Clinton leads by just one point in the IBD, Rasmussen, and LA Times tracking polls, while she shows a commanding 12 point lead in the ABC news poll and a smaller but sizable five point lead in the CNN poll. The Republican Remington Research Group released a slew of polls showing Trump up in Ohio, Nevada, and North Carolina, a tie in Florida, and Clinton leads in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Virginia. However, an independent Siena poll shows Clinton up 7 in North Carolina, while a Monmouth poll shows Trump up one in Arizona

Colin Powell to Vote for Clinton
3 hours ago
Cook Report: Dems to Pick up 5-7 Seats, Retake Senate
5 hours ago

Since the release of the Access Hollywood tape, on which Donald Trump boasted of sexually assaulting women, "Senate Republicans have seen their fortunes dip, particularly in states like Florida, North Carolina, New Hampshire, Nevada and Pennsylvania," where Hillary Clinton now leads. Jennifer Duffy writes that she now expects Democrats to gain five to seven seats—enough to regain control of the chamber.

"Of the Senate seats in the Toss Up column, Trump only leads in Indiana and Missouri where both Republicans are running a few points behind him. ... History shows that races in the Toss Up column never split down the middle; one party tends to win the lion’s share of them."

Tying Republicans to Trump Now an Actionable Offense
7 hours ago

"Some Republicans are running so far away from their party’s nominee that they are threatening to sue TV stations for running ads that suggest they support Donald Trump. Just two weeks before Election Day, five Republicans―Reps. Bob Dold (R-Ill.), Mike Coffman (R-Colo.), David Jolly (R-Fla.), John Katko (R-N.Y.) and Brian Fitzpatrick, a Pennsylvania Republican running for an open seat that’s currently occupied by his brother―contend that certain commercials paid for by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee provide false or misleading information by connecting them to the GOP nominee. Trump is so terrible, these Republicans are essentially arguing, that tying them to him amounts to defamation."

Former Congressman Schock Fined $10,000
7 hours ago

Former Illinois GOP Congressman Aaron Schock "recently agreed to pay a $10,000 fine for making an excessive solicitation for a super PAC that was active in his home state of Illinois four years ago." Schock resigned from Congress after a story about his Downton Abbey-themed congressional office raised questions about how he was using taxpayer dollars.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.