The U.S. and Russia agreed on a deal to eliminate chemical weapons in Syria despite their complicated relationship status. The deal, should it work, doesn’t necessarily satisfy the Syrian opposition but it does put the most international pressure on Syria since the conflict began. Secretary of State John Kerry and Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov announced the partnership Saturday morning at the Intercontinental Hotel in Geneva, where they’ve been negotiating privately since Thursday. “There can be no room for games. Or anything less than full compliance by the Assad regime,” Kerry said Saturday.
Here are the six important points in the U.S.-Russia jointly agreed upon six point plan:
1. Syria has one week to turn over a list of its complete chemical weapons arsenal. The U.S. and Russia agree the Syrian government has roughly 1,000 tons of chemical agents and materials, the BBC reports.
2. Syria must sign the Chemical Weapons Convention, as Bashar al-Assad has promised.
3. Syria’s chemical weapons stockpile must be placed under international control by November.
4. Syria’s chemical weapons stockpile and all associated materials must be destroyed by the first half of 2014.
5. U.N. inspectors must be given “immediate, unfettered access” to Syria’s chemical weapons sites by November. There are allegedly over 50 sites that hold chemical weapons in Syria.
6. The U.N. will help with logistical support and will enforce penalties under Chapter VII, which allows sanctions or military force, should Syria fail to comply with these guidelines. (The U.S. retains the right to use military force; Russia still doesn’t think it’s a good idea.)
So that seems like a reasonable plan that cover a lot of bases and does so quickly, which is the most important part, and eliminates the possibility another chemical weapons attack like the one on August 21 could occur. But the Syrian opposition isn’t enthused with this idea, that averts a potential U.S. military strike against Assad for the foreseeable future. “There is nothing in this agreement that concerns us,” said Gen. Salim Idriss, a leader in the Free Syrian Army. He described the deal was just a Russian mechanism to buy time for the regime, and claimed Assad was already moving his chemical weapons arsenal to Iraq and Lebanon to avoid U.N. inspection.
Does this mean the relationship between the U.S. and Russia is now patched up, that we can expect more international cooperation in the future, that the whole Snowden thing is behind us? Of course not. There’s still the looming potential international incident that is John McCain’s Russian op-ed. And parts of this deal are founded on disagreement between these two countries. But it’s something, for now, that seemingly could fix a very large problem at the center of a civil war that’s not ending any time soon.
Reprinted with permission from the Atlantic Wire. The original story can be found here.
What We're Following See More »
Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.
Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”
Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."
In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-expected primary battle behind her, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (D) is no longer going on the air in upcoming primary states. “Team Clinton hasn’t spent a single cent in … California, Indiana, Kentucky, Oregon and West Virginia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “campaign has spent a little more than $1 million in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone backer in the Senate, said the candidate should end his presidential campaign if he’s losing to Hillary Clinton after the primary season concludes in June, breaking sharply with the candidate who is vowing to take his insurgent bid to the party convention in Philadelphia.”