Coal-Country Democrats Nervously Await EPA Regulations for Power-Plant Emissions

Sunflower Electric Cooperative's coal-fired power plant churns out electricity Thursday, Feb. 1, 2007 in Holcomb, Kan. Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius vetoed a bill allowing two additional coal-fired power plants at the location.
National Journal
Alex Brown
Sept. 18, 2013, 3:30 p.m.

Coal-coun­try Demo­crats aren’t eager to talk about the En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion Agency’s new emis­sion reg­u­la­tions for power plants ex­pec­ted to be re­leased later this week, which could put them in a tough po­s­i­tion between the pres­sures of re­gion­al polit­ics and party loy­alty.

The new lim­its are ex­pec­ted to ef­fect­ively re­quire car­bon cap­ture — a still-de­vel­op­ing tech­no­logy — for all new coal-fired plants in or­der to meet emis­sion stand­ards. That has drawn back­lash from many in the coal in­dustry, but most Demo­crats from coal-heavy re­gions have largely been hes­it­ant to speak out.

The reg­u­la­tions are a corner­stone of Pres­id­ent Obama’s ac­tion plan for ad­dress­ing cli­mate change, with coal-burn­ing power plants known as one of the largest sources of green­house gases in the coun­try. But the coal in­dustry, pro­du­cers of a re­l­at­ively cheap and abund­ant en­ergy source, would be hit hard by the EPA rules, as high­er op­er­at­ing costs for power plants lead util­it­ies to switch to lower-cost and lower-emit­ting nat­ur­al gas.

Only one of the sev­en Demo­crat­ic mem­bers of the Con­gres­sion­al Coal Caucus would com­ment on the reg­u­la­tions; sev­er­al said they were with­hold­ing their re­ac­tions un­til the policy is of­fi­cial. Oth­er coal-coun­try can­did­ates — in­clud­ing Rep. Allyson Schwartz, D-Pa., a can­did­ate for gov­ernor in her state, and West Vir­gin­ia Sec­ret­ary of State Nat­alie Ten­nant, a Sen­ate hope­ful — also did not of­fer com­ment on the new stand­ards. Ten­nant has said she dis­agrees with some of Obama’s coal policies.

Coal in­dustry lead­ers say they ex­pect some politi­cians to break their si­lence soon. “It has not had the level of dis­cus­sion it should be hav­ing in Con­gress,” said Nancy Gravatt, seni­or vice pres­id­ent of com­mu­nic­a­tions for the Na­tion­al Min­ing As­so­ci­ation. “I ex­pect there will be more [Demo­crats op­pos­ing it].” Ohio Coal As­so­ci­ation Pres­id­ent Zane Daniels ad­ded, “I think it’s im­port­ant that we see bi­par­tis­an op­pos­i­tion to the pro­posed reg­u­la­tions.”

Not every Demo­crat has been si­lent on the is­sue, however. Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., voiced his op­pos­i­tion at a Tues­day Sen­ate hear­ing. “We’re get­ting the liv­ing crap beat out of us by this ad­min­is­tra­tion,” he said. “They just beat the liv­ing day­lights out of little West Vir­gin­ia, but they sure like what we pro­duce.”

An­oth­er West Vir­gin­ia Demo­crat, Rep. Nick Ra­hall, was equally vehe­ment in his stance. “I am dead-set against the EPA and their scheme to is­sue emis­sions stand­ards that would make it im­possible for new coal-fired power plants to be con­struc­ted,” he said in a state­ment.

Their po­s­i­tions were wel­come news for Bill Raney, pres­id­ent of the West Vir­gin­ia Coal As­so­ci­ation. “This doesn’t have a thing to do with par­tis­an polit­ics,” he said. “It shouldn’t make a dif­fer­ence to any of them, wheth­er they’re Demo­crat or Re­pub­lic­an; it’s simply wrong.”

Ken­tucky Sec­ret­ary of State Al­is­on Lun­der­gan Grimes, who is chal­len­ging Sen­ate Minor­ity Lead­er Mitch Mc­Con­nell, R-Ky., is­sued her own push­back on the new stand­ards. “Coal keeps the lights on in Ken­tucky — plain and simple — and I will not stand idle as over­reach­ing reg­u­la­tion ad­versely im­pacts jobs and middle-class fam­il­ies,” she said.

Sens. Joe Don­nelly, D-Ind., and Robert Ca­sey, D-Pa., would not of­fer com­ment on the reg­u­la­tions un­til they are made of­fi­cial, but Don­nelly urged a fo­cus on ex­ist­ing tech­no­logy and Ca­sey praised coal’s role as a cheap en­ergy source.

Such breaks with Obama’s policy are of­ten ne­ces­sary for Demo­crats from coal-heavy areas, said one Pennsylvania Demo­crat­ic op­er­at­ive who re­ques­ted an­onym­ity to pro­tect a cur­rent can­did­ate. “People have a gen­er­al per­cep­tion of the parties,” he said. “[Demo­crats] al­most have to be more vo­cal than the Re­pub­lic­ans some­times be­cause you don’t want to be painted with that broad brush. It also kind of sym­bol­izes who you’re for. It’s not just an en­ergy is­sue; it’s a cul­tur­al is­sue. Be­ing against coal can mean to voters that you’re against the work­ing class, you’re an elit­ist.”

What We're Following See More »
FEELING THE MIDWESTERN BERN
Sanders Upsets Clinton in Indiana
38 minutes ago
THE LATEST

Despite trailing Hillary Clinton by a significant margin, Bernie Sanders wasn't going the way of Ted Cruz tonight. The Vermont senator upset Clinton in Indiana, with MSNBC calling the race at 9pm. Sanders appears poised to win by a five- or six-point spread.

Source:
TRUMP IS PRESUMPTIVE NOMINEE
Ted Cruz Bows Out, Effectively Ceding the Contest to Trump
1 hours ago
THE LATEST

And just like that, it's over. Ted Cruz will suspend his presidential campaign after losing badly to Donald Trump in Indiana tonight. "While Cruz had always hedged when asked whether he would quit if he lost Indiana; his campaign had laid a huge bet on the state." John Kasich's campaign has pledged to carry on. “From the beginning, I’ve said that I would continue on as long as there was a viable path to victory,” said Cruz. “Tonight, I’m sorry to say it appears that path has been foreclosed."

Source:
TAKES AT LEAST 45 DELEGATES
Trump Wins Indiana, All but Seals the Nomination
1 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Republican establishment's last remaining hope—a contested convention this summer—may have just ended in Indiana, as Donald Trump won a decisive victory over Ted Cruz. Nothing Cruz seemed to have in his corner seemed to help—not a presumptive VP pick in Carly Fiorina, not a midwestern state where he's done well in the past, and not the state's legions of conservatives. Though Trump "won't secure the 1,237 delegates he needs to formally claim the nomination until June, his Indiana triumph makes it almost impossible to stop him. Following his decisive wins in New York and other East Coast states, the Indiana victory could put Trump within 200 delegates of the magic number he needs to clinch the nomination." Cruz, meanwhile, "now faces the agonizing choice of whether to remain in the race, with his attempt to force the party into a contested convention in tatters, or to bow out and cede the party nomination to his political nemesis." The Associated Press, which called the race at 7pm, predicts Trump will win at least 45 delegates.

Source:
LOTS OF STRINGERS
Inside the AP’s Election Operation
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
THE QUESTION
What’s the Average Household Income of a Trump Voter?
6 hours ago
THE ANSWER

Seventy-two thousand dollars, according to FiveThirtyEight. That's higher than the national average, as well as the average Clinton or Sanders voter, but lower than the average Kasich voter.

Source:
×