Gun Control Failed in Congress. It’s Happening Anyway.

Between Newtown and the Navy Yard, President Obama launched 25 separate initiatives — and there’s little the NRA can do to stop them.

President Obama addressed the Navy Yard shooting before a speech on Monday from the White House.
National Journal
Patrick Reis and Matt Vasilogambros
Patrick Reis Matt Vasilogambros
Sept. 17, 2013, 11:44 a.m.

Gun-con­trol le­gis­la­tion failed loudly fol­low­ing the New­town school shoot­ing, but that has not stopped Pres­id­ent Obama from leav­ing Con­gress be­hind to launch a broad gun-con­trol cam­paign of his own.

Between the Decem­ber 2012 mas­sacre and the Navy Yard mass shoot­ing Monday, Obama has taken 25 sep­ar­ate gun-con­trol ini­ti­at­ives, all of which came from ex­ec­ut­ive ac­tions that did not re­quire con­gres­sion­al au­thor­iz­a­tion.

The pres­id­ent’s highest-pro­file move was to nom­in­ate and get con­firmed Todd Jones as dir­ect­or of the Bur­eau of Al­co­hol, To­bacco, Fire­arms, and Ex­plos­ives, filling a seat that had sat empty for more than six years. But Obama has also ini­ti­ated a series of quieter ini­ti­at­ives, in­clud­ing new rules to keep guns away from felons, bet­ter co­ordin­ate men­tal-ill­ness screen­ings, and bet­ter pre­par­ing loc­al law en­force­ment and schools to re­spond to shoot­ings.

The White House read­ily ad­mits its ac­tions alone can­not solve the na­tion’s epi­dem­ic of gun vi­ol­ence, but giv­en that an ex­pan­ded-back­ground-check bill stalled in the Sen­ate in April, the ex­ec­ut­ive or­ders are — for now — Obama’s only avail­able op­tion.

“Even without Con­gress, my ad­min­is­tra­tion will keep do­ing everything it can to pro­tect more of our com­munit­ies,” a vis­ibly angry Obama said after the bill fell six votes shy of the 60 needed to break a fili­buster.

For Obama, the ac­tions’ main ad­vant­age is that they can­not be blocked by the power­ful gun lobby — in­clud­ing the Na­tion­al Rifle As­so­ci­ation — that suc­cess­fully sty­mied the pres­id­ent’s le­gis­lat­ive push. Down the line, the rules could be changed by a sub­sequent ad­min­is­tra­tion, or Con­gress could hamper their ef­fic­acy by at some point cut­ting the fund­ing to en­force them. But, for now at least, Obama can move for­ward without wait­ing for any­one else’s per­mis­sion.

Most of Obama’s or­ders are aimed at re­du­cing ad­min­is­trat­ive weak­nesses that com­plic­ate the en­force­ment of ex­ist­ing gun laws, said John Hudak, a fel­low in gov­ernance stud­ies at the Brook­ings In­sti­tu­tion.

It will be years, however, be­fore any­one knows wheth­er these policies have any meas­ur­able ef­fect in re­du­cing gun vi­ol­ence, Hudak said. “Be­cause these policies were either launched in Janu­ary or the con­ver­sa­tion about them was launched in Janu­ary, we cer­tainly don’t have any evid­ence about their ef­fect­ive­ness one way or an­oth­er,” he said.

And re­gard­less of suc­cess­ful they are, the power of these ini­ti­at­ives to curb gun vi­ol­ence pales in com­par­is­on to what con­gres­sion­al ac­tion could ac­com­plish, Hudak said. “These are piece­meal changes, some of them are ce­re­mo­ni­al. There’s only so much he can do without Con­gress. The pres­id­ent’s hands are quite tied.”

And so, even as Obama has pur­sued his own re­forms, his ad­min­is­tra­tion has con­tinu­ally de­man­ded ac­tion from Con­gress. That con­tin­ued Tues­day, when — in his com­ments on the Navy Yard mass murder in Wash­ing­ton — White House press sec­ret­ary Jay Car­ney lashed out at Re­pub­lic­ans for block­ing the back­ground check bill in April.

“The prob­lem here is not Demo­crats,” Car­ney said, when pressed by re­port­ers on the num­ber of mass shoot­ings in Obama’s pres­id­ency. “The prob­lem here is sen­at­ors, over­whelm­ingly from one party, who re­fuse to do something very simple, which is ex­pand the back­ground-check sys­tem that every­one be­lieves func­tions well but needs to func­tion bet­ter. It’s their choice.”

Five Demo­crats voted against the bill in April, al­though one of those was Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id, who sup­por­ted the meas­ure but voted against it for pro­ced­ur­al reas­ons that would al­low him to bring it to the Sen­ate floor again.

Four Re­pub­lic­ans voted for the meas­ure, while 42 voted against it.

Felons, Gun Im­ports, and Men­tal Health


Of the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s 25 ac­tions, two were launched in Au­gust, in­clud­ing one that closes a loop­hole that doesn’t re­quire back­ground checks for weapons re­gistered un­der a trust or cor­por­a­tion. There­fore, the ad­min­is­tra­tion ar­gues, felons, or do­mest­ic ab­users can eas­ily gain ac­cess to these weapons. In the last year, the ATF has re­ceived more than 39,000 of these re­quests, and though many of those were likely for le­git­im­ate cor­por­a­tions, the loop­hole provides felons a win­dow for ob­tain­ing fire­arms they wouldn’t have oth­er­wise, Hudak said. The White House is cur­rently work­ing on a pro­posed ver­sion of the new rules, which would then be sub­ject to pub­lic com­ment and re­sub­mit­ted as a fi­nal rule.

The White House has also put in place a policy to deny re­quests to bring Amer­ic­an mil­it­ary-grade fire­arms to the U.S. from oth­er coun­tries, with the ex­cep­tion of mu­seums. Since 2005, the United States has au­thor­ized more than 250,000 of these weapons to come in­to the coun­try. This new policy, which the ad­min­is­tra­tion says will help keep these guns off the streets, has been im­ple­men­ted. Both of these ex­ec­ut­ive ac­tions were an­nounced in Au­gust.

In total, the ad­min­is­tra­tion has moved on or fin­ished 24 of the 25 ex­ec­ut­ive ac­tions. The only one that is pending is a rule that would make group health care plans of­fer men­tal-health be­ne­fits at par­ity with oth­er med­ic­al and sur­gic­al be­ne­fits. The ad­min­is­tra­tion is ex­pec­ted to fi­nal­ize this rule later this year.

Here are the ori­gin­al 23 ex­ec­ut­ive ac­tions:

Ex­ec­ut­ive Ac­tions on Gun Vi­ol­ence

Felons, Gun Imports, and Mental Health


Of the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s 25 ac­tions, two were launched in Au­gust, in­clud­ing one that closes a loop­hole that doesn’t re­quire back­ground checks for weapons re­gistered un­der a trust or cor­por­a­tion. There­fore, the ad­min­is­tra­tion ar­gues, felons, or do­mest­ic ab­users can eas­ily gain ac­cess to these weapons. In the last year, the ATF has re­ceived more than 39,000 of these re­quests, and though many of those were likely for le­git­im­ate cor­por­a­tions, the loop­hole provides felons a win­dow for ob­tain­ing fire­arms they wouldn’t have oth­er­wise, Hudak said. The White House is cur­rently work­ing on a pro­posed ver­sion of the new rules, which would then be sub­ject to pub­lic com­ment and re­sub­mit­ted as a fi­nal rule.

The White House has also put in place a policy to deny re­quests to bring Amer­ic­an mil­it­ary-grade fire­arms to the U.S. from oth­er coun­tries, with the ex­cep­tion of mu­seums. Since 2005, the United States has au­thor­ized more than 250,000 of these weapons to come in­to the coun­try. This new policy, which the ad­min­is­tra­tion says will help keep these guns off the streets, has been im­ple­men­ted. Both of these ex­ec­ut­ive ac­tions were an­nounced in Au­gust.

In total, the ad­min­is­tra­tion has moved on or fin­ished 24 of the 25 ex­ec­ut­ive ac­tions. The only one that is pending is a rule that would make group health care plans of­fer men­tal-health be­ne­fits at par­ity with oth­er med­ic­al and sur­gic­al be­ne­fits. The ad­min­is­tra­tion is ex­pec­ted to fi­nal­ize this rule later this year.

Here are the ori­gin­al 23 ex­ec­ut­ive ac­tions:

Ex­ec­ut­ive Ac­tions on Gun Vi­ol­ence

What We're Following See More »
‘PRESUMPTIVE NOMINEE’
Priebus Asks Party to Unite Behind Trump
1 hours ago
THE LATEST
FEELING THE MIDWESTERN BERN
Sanders Upsets Clinton in Indiana
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

Despite trailing Hillary Clinton by a significant margin, Bernie Sanders wasn't going the way of Ted Cruz tonight. The Vermont senator upset Clinton in Indiana, with MSNBC calling the race at 9pm. Sanders appears poised to win by a five- or six-point spread.

Source:
TRUMP IS PRESUMPTIVE NOMINEE
Ted Cruz Bows Out, Effectively Ceding the Contest to Trump
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

And just like that, it's over. Ted Cruz will suspend his presidential campaign after losing badly to Donald Trump in Indiana tonight. "While Cruz had always hedged when asked whether he would quit if he lost Indiana; his campaign had laid a huge bet on the state." John Kasich's campaign has pledged to carry on. “From the beginning, I’ve said that I would continue on as long as there was a viable path to victory,” said Cruz. “Tonight, I’m sorry to say it appears that path has been foreclosed."

Source:
TAKES AT LEAST 45 DELEGATES
Trump Wins Indiana, All but Seals the Nomination
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Republican establishment's last remaining hope—a contested convention this summer—may have just ended in Indiana, as Donald Trump won a decisive victory over Ted Cruz. Nothing Cruz seemed to have in his corner seemed to help—not a presumptive VP pick in Carly Fiorina, not a midwestern state where he's done well in the past, and not the state's legions of conservatives. Though Trump "won't secure the 1,237 delegates he needs to formally claim the nomination until June, his Indiana triumph makes it almost impossible to stop him. Following his decisive wins in New York and other East Coast states, the Indiana victory could put Trump within 200 delegates of the magic number he needs to clinch the nomination." Cruz, meanwhile, "now faces the agonizing choice of whether to remain in the race, with his attempt to force the party into a contested convention in tatters, or to bow out and cede the party nomination to his political nemesis." The Associated Press, which called the race at 7pm, predicts Trump will win at least 45 delegates.

Source:
LOTS OF STRINGERS
Inside the AP’s Election Operation
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
×