Air Force Brass Confident of Nuclear Base Security Following Deadly Navy Incident

Elaine M. Grossman, Global Security Newswire
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Elaine M. Grossman, Global Security Newswire
Sept. 18, 2013, 10:02 a.m.

NA­TION­AL HAR­BOR, MD. — A two-star Air Force gen­er­al re­spons­ible for over­see­ing atom­ic mat­ters on Tues­day voiced con­fid­ence in se­cur­ity at ser­vice bases hous­ing nuc­le­ar-tipped ground-based bal­list­ic mis­siles and grav­ity bombs, fol­low­ing Monday’s deadly shoot­ing at the Navy Yard in Wash­ing­ton.

Asked if the Air Force would re­view its con­tract­or se­cur­ity clear­ances and base-ac­cess pro­ced­ures — giv­en rev­el­a­tions that al­leged killer Aaron Alex­is had a his­tory of men­tal-health prob­lems and gun-re­lated in­cid­ents — Maj. Gen. Gar­rett Har­en­cak played down the idea that sim­il­ar se­cur­ity gaps could af­fect his ser­vice’s stew­ard­ship of two-thirds of the na­tion’s nuc­le­ar ar­sen­al.

“We nev­er stop do­ing that,” said Har­en­cak, the Air Force as­sist­ant chief of staff for stra­tegic de­terrence and nuc­le­ar in­teg­ra­tion. “We’re al­ways con­stantly self-as­sess­ing our se­cur­ity pro­ced­ures; we’re al­ways test­ing our se­cur­ity pro­ced­ures.”

“This is not just part of the nuc­le­ar en­ter­prise … but [is] throughout our United States Air Force,” he con­tin­ued, speak­ing at an Air Force As­so­ci­ation con­fer­ence just out­side of Wash­ing­ton.  “We’re nev­er stat­ic when it comes to look­ing at bet­ter ways … to se­cure our air­men and our fa­cil­it­ies.”

The nuc­le­ar lead­er ad­ded, though, that he would have to check with his ser­vice’s se­cur­ity dir­ect­or­ate be­fore know­ing wheth­er a fresh Air Force re­view would be con­duc­ted, based on the ap­par­ent Navy Yard lapses that al­lowed Alex­is a fa­cil­ity badge as a con­tract­or and entry in­to the Navy fa­cil­ity.

The Air Force did not provide a re­ques­ted re­sponse on the mat­ter pri­or to press time on Wed­nes­day.

The Navy Yard shoot­er killed 12 ci­vil­ian per­son­nel at the base be­fore be­ing shot dead him­self by law en­force­ment. Sev­er­al oth­ers were wounded in the at­tack, which has since been at­trib­uted to Alex­is as the lone gun­man.

De­fense Sec­ret­ary Chuck Hagel on Wed­nes­day an­nounced that he had launched two ma­jor re­views the pri­or day, both of which will be led by Ashton Carter, the Pentagon’s No. 2 of­fi­cial.

“We will do everything pos­sible to pre­vent this from hap­pen­ing again,” Hagel said at a press con­fer­ence.

One re­view is to fo­cus on “phys­ic­al se­cur­ity and ac­cess pro­ced­ures” for U.S. bases world­wide, while the oth­er will ad­dress De­fense De­part­ment “prac­tices and pro­ced­ures for grant­ing and re­new­ing se­cur­ity clear­ances,” in­clud­ing for con­tract­ors, he said.

Pentagon lead­ers would im­ple­ment the re­com­mend­a­tions of both re­views and ad­dress any gaps they find, Hagel said.

“Ob­vi­ously there were a lot of red flags,” the de­fense sec­ret­ary said in ref­er­ence to Alex­is’s abil­ity to re­tain a se­cur­ity clear­ance and fa­cil­ity priv­ileges. “Why they didn’t get picked up, why they didn’t get in­cor­por­ated in­to the clear­ance pro­cess, what he was do­ing — Those are all le­git­im­ate ques­tions that we’re go­ing to be deal­ing with.”

Alex­is pre­vi­ously had been ar­res­ted but nev­er charged with a crime, lead­ing some ob­serv­ers to ques­tion wheth­er the clear­ance pro­cess may not ac­count suf­fi­ciently for troub­ling warn­ing signs.

The chair­man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff stopped short of con­clud­ing wheth­er the pro­cess was to blame, or if in­stead there was hu­man er­ror in im­ple­ment­ing ex­ist­ing clear­ance or ac­cess rules.

“I think this will be scru­tin­ized a great deal,” said Gen. Mar­tin De­mp­sey, speak­ing at the same press brief­ing. “Un­til I un­der­stand the out­come of the in­vest­ig­a­tion, I can’t render a judg­ment about wheth­er it was a red flag or just something that flew be­neath the radar.”

What We're Following See More »
$618 BILLION IN FUNDING
By a Big Margin, House Passes Defense Bill
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

The National Defense Authorization Act passed the House this morning by a 375-34 vote. The bill, which heads to the Senate next week for final consideration, would fund the military to the tune of $618.7 billion, "about $3.2 billion more than the president requested for fiscal 2017. ... The White House has issued a veto threat on both the House and Senate-passed versions of the bill, but has not yet said if it will sign the compromise bill released by the conference committee this week."

Source:
SUCCEEDS UPTON
Walden to Chair Energy and Commerce Committee
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"Republicans have elected Rep. Greg Walden (R-OR) the next chairman of the powerful House Energy and Commerce Committee. Walden defeated Reps. John Shimkus (R-IL) and Joe Barton (R-TX), the former committee chairman, in the race for the gavel" to succeed Michgan's Fred Upton.

Source:
BIPARTISAN SUPPORT
Senators Looking to Limit Deportations Under Trump
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

"Democratic and Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee are working on legislation that would limit deportations" under President-elect Donald Trump. Leading the effort are Judiciary Committee members Dick Durbin (D-IL) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC). Sen. Jeff Flake (R-AZ) is also expected to sign on.

Source:
REQUIRES CHANGE IN LAW
Trump Taps Mattis for Defense Secretary
2 days ago
BREAKING

Donald Trump has selected retired Marine Gen. James 'Mad Dog' Mattis as his secretary of defense, according to The Washington Post. Mattis retired from active duty just four years ago, so Congress will have "to pass new legislation to bypass a federal law that states secretaries of defense must not have been on active duty in the previous seven years." The official announcement is likely to come next week.

Source:
MEASURE HEADED TO OBAMA
Senate OKs 10-Year Extension of Iran Sanctions
2 days ago
THE LATEST
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login