Congressman Complains About Making $172,000 a Year

Millionaire GOP lawmaker Phil Gingrey laments his low salary.

U.S. Rep. Phil Gingrey, R-Ga., announces his bid for the U.S. Senate at a press conference, Wednesday, March 27, 2013, in Atlanta. (AP Photo/David Goldman)  
National Journal
Add to Briefcase
Alex Seitz Wald
Sept. 18, 2013, 1:38 p.m.

Woe is Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Phil Gin­grey of Geor­gia, who be­moaned in a closed-door meet­ing this morn­ing that he’s “stuck” mak­ing a paltry $172,000 a year in Con­gress. Nev­er mind that this is more than three times the na­tion­al av­er­age in­come, or that Gin­grey is worth $3 mil­lion. Mean­while, he’s run­ning for Sen­ate, where can only ex­pect a $2,000 raise.

Cap­it­ol Hill aides can go work for a lobby shop and make $500,000, the con­gress­man said, ac­cord­ing to Na­tion­al Re­view‘s Jonath­an Strong. “Mean­while I’m stuck here mak­ing $172,000 a year.”

The con­text of Gin­grey’s com­ments is a bit com­plic­ated, but some­how makes the story even less flat­ter­ing. By a quirk of par­tis­an pos­tur­ing and ad­min­is­trat­ive rul­ings, the biggest vic­tims of Obama­care may be mem­bers of Con­gress and their staffers, who — if some GOP law­makers have their way — will lose the sub­sid­ized health in­sur­ance they cur­rently en­joy, which op­er­ates like any oth­er em­ploy­er-provided in­sur­ance plan. 

Re­pub­lic­ans ad­ded an amend­ment to the Af­ford­able Care Act to force mem­bers of Con­gress and their aides off of the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment’s em­ploy­ee health plan and onto the newly cre­ated health in­sur­ance ex­changes. The ex­changes wer­en’t de­signed for this, and the un­usu­al situ­ation meant law­makers might lose the sub­sidies they use to help pay for their premi­ums. For­tu­nately for den­iz­ens of Cap­it­ol Hill, the Of­fice of Per­son­nel Man­age­ment (sort of the gov­ern­ment’s hu­man re­sources de­part­ment) ruled that the gov­ern­ment could con­tin­ue to provide the sub­sidy. Case closed?

Not ex­actly. The rul­ing promp­ted con­ser­vat­ive groups like Freedom­Works to claim that Con­gress was giv­ing it­self an ex­emp­tion from Obama­care. Gin­grey, along with Louisi­ana Re­pub­lic­an Dav­id Vit­ter in the Sen­ate, has led the charge on the “No Spe­cial Treat­ment for Con­gress Act,” which would end the sub­sidy.

And that brings us to the base­ment of the Cap­it­ol, where, per Strong, some less af­flu­ent law­makers chal­lenged Gin­grey on the bill. Rep. Joe Bar­ton of Texas, for in­stance, said the loss of the sub­sidy would cost him $12,000. “That’s a bur­den. And it’s a bur­den on our staff, too,” he re­portedly said.

Gin­grey was un­sym­path­et­ic, and had even less con­cern for those spoiled staffers, cit­ing their abil­ity to make bank on K Street while he wal­lows on $172,000. The ob­vi­ous re­join­der, which Demo­crats are sure to make, is that they’d be happy to re­lieve of him the bur­den of his job and meek salary and send him through the re­volving door to K Street.

Some of Gin­grey’s fel­low law­makers were “in­censed” by the re­mark, hence the leak to Strong, but the com­ment prob­ably won’t help the GOP’s prob­lems of be­ing per­ceived as a party ex­clus­ively for the wealthy.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.