The Republicans Who Fear a Shutdown

They aren’t in Washington — and they’re very worried about driving away independent voters.

Playing with fire:House Republicans.  
© 2011 Charles Mann, All Right
Alex Roarty
Sept. 19, 2013, 4:10 p.m.

Thirty-three per­cent. That’s Pres­id­ent Obama’s ap­prov­al rat­ing among white voters, ac­cord­ing to an ABC News/Wash­ing­ton Post poll re­leased this week. The num­ber is even worse — 30 per­cent — in the latest All­state/Na­tion­al Journ­al Heart­land Mon­it­or Poll. Those are stag­ger­ingly low num­bers for a pres­id­ent who claimed nearly 40 per­cent of the white vote dur­ing last year’s elec­tion. And Obama’s free fall is even worse for Demo­crats than it ap­pears, be­cause some of next year’s key Sen­ate elec­tions take place in pre­dom­in­antly white states, such as Arkan­sas, Ken­tucky, Montana, and West Vir­gin­ia. Obama is ex­per­i­en­cing the kind of slump that be­sets a pres­id­ent when his second term has been marred by scan­dal, in­ef­fect­ive­ness, and a lackluster eco­nomy.

Re­pub­lic­ans eye­ing Obama’s troubles should be giddy about next year’s pro­spects for win­ning con­trol of the Sen­ate and main­tain­ing their big ma­jor­ity in the House. Ex­cept, in­stead of dream­ing about ma­jor­it­ies in both cham­bers of Con­gress, they’re more fo­cused on one little, nag­ging con­cern: House Re­pub­lic­ans could screw it all up.

The House GOP’s de­cision to solder to­geth­er plans to fund the gov­ern­ment while de­fund­ing Obama­care — a pro­pos­al res­ol­utely op­posed by the pres­id­ent and Sen­ate Demo­crats — boosts the odds of a gov­ern­ment shut­down. Even if a fund­ing res­ol­u­tion even­tu­ally passes, Con­gress then must reach an agree­ment to raise the debt ceil­ing. In both cases, a quick com­prom­ise seems im­possible.

That’s what has Re­pub­lic­an Party of­fi­cials and strategists na­tion­wide wor­ried. They fear the pub­lic will blame the GOP for Wash­ing­ton’s dys­func­tion. And al­though de­vel­op­ments 14 months be­fore an elec­tion rarely mat­ter, a gov­ern­ment shut­down, which could lead to a severe dis­rup­tion of ser­vices, and a debt-ceil­ing stan­doff, which could throw the coun­try’s en­tire eco­nomy in­to per­il, have the mag­nitude to ripple un­til next Novem­ber. Enough to change the polit­ic­al tra­ject­ory of the midterm elec­tions from one that’s prom­ising for Re­pub­lic­an can­did­ates to one that will blow up in their faces. “This has po­ten­tial to be something that voters no­tice,” said Glen Bol­ger, a Re­pub­lic­an poll­ster. “It could af­fect voters where they live.”

The con­cern is most acute out­side of Wash­ing­ton, where Re­pub­lic­ans tar­get­ing vul­ner­able Demo­crat­ic law­makers worry they could be foiled be­fore the 2014 cam­paign even be­gins in earn­est. Shut­ting down the gov­ern­ment, they say, would re­in­force voters’ worst im­pres­sion of the party — that it fa­vors ideo­logy over prac­tic­al solu­tions. “Some of the rhet­or­ic and lan­guage com­ing out of Re­pub­lic­ans in Wash­ing­ton is con­cern­ing, be­cause those aren’t the mes­sages that are go­ing to at­tract in­de­pend­ent voters,” said Matt Strawn, former chair­man of the Iowa Re­pub­lic­an Party. “In Iowa, in­de­pend­ents are an over­whelm­ing ma­jor­ity of our voters.”

The im­pend­ing re­tire­ment of Sen. Tom Har­kin, D-Iowa, has opened the door for Re­pub­lic­ans to fill that seat with one of their own. But while Demo­crats have ral­lied be­hind a single can­did­ate, Rep. Bruce Bra­ley, the GOP primary elect­or­ate is split among five hope­fuls. And Strawn wor­ries that in an ef­fort to court the party’s most con­ser­vat­ive fac­tions, the GOP can­did­ates will back pro­pos­als to de­fund the 2010 health care law that will ali­en­ate mod­er­ates. (One of them, former U.S. At­tor­ney Matt Whi­taker, has already cri­ti­cized his op­pon­ents for not pledging to do so.) “It is lan­guage that will lead to good re­cep­tions at party chili sup­pers throughout the fall, but it’s not lan­guage of suc­cess for the gen­er­al elec­tion,” Strawn said.

GOP of­fi­cials else­where voiced sim­il­ar con­cerns. “[Voters] are look­ing for prob­lem-solv­ers,” said one North Car­o­lina strategist, gran­ted an­onym­ity to speak can­didly. “They’re look­ing for people who put vi­able al­tern­at­ives on the table. If Re­pub­lic­ans don’t do that “¦ then [a shut­down] may hurt the Re­pub­lic­ans more.”

A shut­down poses risks for Obama and Demo­crats, too. A dis­rup­tion of ser­vices could lead angry voters to blame the man in charge of gov­ern­ment, the pres­id­ent. And con­ser­vat­ives hope that once the House passes its bill, the pub­lic will won­der why Obama doesn’t just aban­don his health care law, which re­cent polls have re­por­ted is at re­cord un­pop­ular­ity.

But past shut­downs — es­pe­cially the in­fam­ous con­front­a­tion in 1995 and 1996 between then-House Speak­er Newt Gin­grich and Pres­id­ent Clin­ton — have favored the man with the bully pul­pit. Voters blamed Gin­grich — and polls nev­er again showed Clin­ton trail­ing even­tu­al GOP pres­id­en­tial nom­in­ee Bob Dole. “My cau­tion would be look­ing at 1995 and 1996; no mat­ter how you think things are go­ing to go for your side, the pres­id­ent has the big­ger mi­cro­phone,” Bol­ger said. “And that makes it that much it more dif­fi­cult to win an out-and-out fight.”

In fact, for a pres­id­ent strug­gling with a second term, a show­down with un­pop­u­lar House Re­pub­lic­ans might be just what he needs. Even the con­ser­vat­ive Wall Street Journ­al ed­it­or­i­al board ac­know­ledged the up­side for the pres­id­ent in a po­ten­tial fight. “With his own pop­ular­ity fad­ing, Mr. Obama may want a shut­down so he can change the sub­ject to his ca­ri­ca­ture of GOP zealots who want no gov­ern­ment,” the news­pa­per wrote, ur­ging House Re­pub­lic­ans to aban­don their plan to de­fund Obama­care. “He’ll blame any tur­moil or eco­nom­ic fal­lout on House Re­pub­lic­ans, fig­ur­ing that he can split the tea party from the GOP and that this is the one event that could re­in­stall Nancy Pelosi as speak­er. Mr. Obama could spend his fi­nal two years go­ing out in a blaze of lib­er­al glory.”

For their part, some Demo­crats wel­come a shut­down. Said one party strategist, “One could only help they give us that Christ­mas mir­acle so early.” House Re­pub­lic­ans had bet­ter hope it doesn’t come to that. At this point, they’re the only obstacle stand­ing between their party and a suc­cess­ful midterm elec­tion. 

What We're Following See More »
LOTS OF STRINGERS
Inside the AP’s Election Operation
41 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE
THE QUESTION
What’s the Average Household Income of a Trump Voter?
43 minutes ago
THE ANSWER

Seventy-two thousand dollars, according to FiveThirtyEight. That's higher than the national average, as well as the average Clinton or Sanders voter, but lower than the average Kasich voter.

Source:
VERY FEW DEMS NOW REPRESENT MINING COMMUNITIES
How Coal Country Went from Blue to Red
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
STAFF PICKS
History Already Being Less Kind to Hastert’s Leadership
5 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In light of his recent confessions, the speakership of Dennis Hastert is being judged far more harshly. The New York Times' Carl Hulse notes that in hindsight, Hastert now "fares poorly" on a number of fronts, from his handling of the Mark Foley page scandal to "an explosion" of earmarks to the weakening of committee chairmen. "Even his namesake Hastert rule—the informal standard that no legislation should be brought to a vote without the support of a majority of the majority — has come to be seen as a structural barrier to compromise."

Source:
‘STARTING FROM ZERO’
Trump Ill Prepared for General Election
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Even if "[t]he Republican presidential nomination may be in his sights ... Trump has so far ignored vital preparations needed for a quick and effective transition to the general election. The New York businessman has collected little information about tens of millions of voters he needs to turn out in the fall. He's sent few people to battleground states compared with likely Democratic rival Hillary Clinton, accumulated little if any research on her, and taken no steps to build a network capable of raising the roughly $1 billion needed to run a modern-day general election campaign."

Source:
×