How Bashar al-Assad Rationalizes ‘Doing Harm’

“Sometimes [doctors] have to extract the bad member that could kill the patient.”

Syrian President Bashar Assad leaves the Elysee Palace following his meeting with his French counterpart Nicolas Sarkozy, in Paris, Friday Nov. 13, 2009. Assad says that Mideast peace will be the main issue in his talks with President Nicolas Sarkozy and that "France must act." (AP Photo/Remy de la Mauviniere)
ASSOCIATED PRESS
Brian Resnick
See more stories about...
Brian Resnick
Sept. 18, 2013, 4:21 p.m.

It was a strange set-up for an in­ter­view. Ru­mors had cir­cu­lated for a couple of days that former Demo­crat­ic Rep. Den­nis Ku­cinich had scored an in­ter­view with Syr­i­an Pres­id­ent Bashar al-As­sad. Fox only pro­moted the in­ter­view hours be­fore it aired, and it came with a string of qual­i­fic­a­tions from an­chor Bret Baier. “Ku­cinich was not there in the ca­pa­city of a journ­al­ist, nor was he rep­res­ent­ing Fox News in that role,” he said. Fox News re­port­er Greg Palkot joined him, however, and asked half the ques­tions.

As­sad gave a string of an­swers that are sure to rile Pres­id­ent Obama and those who share the asse­ment of U.S. in­tel­li­gence.

As­sad ad­mit­ted that yes, Syr­ia has chem­ic­al weapons. “It’s not a secret any­more,” As­sad said. He also re­layed he will agree to hand them over, but made some strange warn­ings that do­ing so “would be very det­ri­ment­al to the en­vir­on­ment.” But yet, he con­tin­ued to deny that they were used by the gov­ern­ment.

He also said Syr­ia wasn’t en­gaged in a civil war but in a war against ji­hadists fun­ded by out­siders. He said that few­er ci­vil­ians have been killed than what has been re­por­ted. Palkot asked the pres­id­ent if he en­gaged in the mass killings of his own people. As­sad denied that ac­cus­a­tion, say­ing that in the vil­lages he bombed, the ci­vil­ians had fled or were serving as hu­man shields. “Wheth­er the ter­ror­ists enter an area, the ci­vil­ians would leave, un­less they use them as a hu­man shield,” he said. “So in the case of the Syr­i­an army at­tack area, where there is no ci­vil­ians liv­ing in it most of the cases you can hardly find ci­vil­ians.”

So he denied most of the hor­rible al­leg­a­tions slung against him. But he lent some in­sight in­to how he ra­tion­al­izes such acts.

Ku­cinich asked him:

Not every­one who is watch­ing this in­ter­view today knows that you are a doc­tor. You are an MD. And you have done this be­fore you were pres­id­ent. As you know, doc­tors take an oath nev­er to do harm to any­one. That’s a dir­ect quote from the Hip­po­crat­ic oath. Does a doc­tor give that up when he takes polit­ic­al of­fice?

As­sad re­spon­ded with a meta­phor that could jus­ti­fy any sort of ag­gre­sion, if it’s for that great his­tor­ic­al steam­roller, “the great­er good.” He said that some­times you have to cut off a limb to save the pa­tient:

First of all doc­tor takes the right de­cision to pro­tect the life of the pa­tient. You can’t say they do not do harm phys­ic­ally. Some­times they have to ex­tract the bad mem­ber that could kill the pa­tient. Ex­tract eyes, could ex­tract leg and so on. But you don’t say he is a bad doc­tor. It’s still a hu­man­it­ari­an job, whatever they do. The same for politi­cian but in a lar­ger scale. Doc­tors deal with one pa­tient. Wheth­er your de­cision help the life of the Syr­i­ans or not in such a situ­ation. Nobody likes the vi­ol­ence. We are against the vi­ol­ence. But what will we do when the ter­ror­ists at­tack your coun­try? And kill the people. Would you say that I’m against vi­ol­ence or you de­fend? You have army. You have po­lice. They have to do their job. This is the con­sti­tu­tion. This is the — the role of any gov­ern­ment. What did they do in Los Angeles in the 1990s when you have [ri­ots]? Send your army? You did. So, this is the mis­sion of the gov­ern­ment the most im­port­ant thing is when you make the de­cision wheth­er it harms or not which would help the ma­jor­ity of the people. It’s bet­ter if you take the de­cision that could help every­one but some­times, in cer­tain cir­cum­stances, in dif­fi­cult cir­cum­stances, you can­not. So you have to take the less harm­ful.

Well, 100,000 people and 4 mil­lion refugees is an aw­fully big limb to re­move. What’s left of the body?

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
6 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
7 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×