The Secret American Subculture of Putin-Worshippers

.photo.right{display:none;}The Russian president has his fans here — who see him as the very epitome of macho manliness.

Vladimir Putin drinks beer in the Zhiguli beer bar in Moscow, May 1, 2012.
AP Photo/RIA-Novosti, Alexei Druzhinin
Marin Cogan
See more stories about...
Marin Cogan
Sept. 19, 2013, 4:10 p.m.

{{ BIZOBJ (slideshow: 688) }}

Two years ago, Gayne C. Young, a Texas-based writer and blog­ger for Out­door Life, scored the in­ter­view of a life­time. As a beat writer, Young had en­joyed the out­door ex­ploits of Rus­si­an Pres­id­ent Vladi­mir Putin, who has been doc­u­mented shoot­ing a gray whale with a cross­bow, tran­quil­iz­ing a ti­ger at­tack­ing a news crew, hunt­ing shirt­less, fish­ing shirt­less, and rid­ing horse­back shirt­less. On a per­son­al level, Young liked the rugged brand of mas­culin­ity that seemed a throw­back to Teddy Roosevelt. “Al­though you have Clin­ton shoot­ing ducks, you nev­er see it. Al­though Rick Perry says he en­joys hunt­ing, you don’t see it. They say they do, but they don’t. Obama says he shoots skeet, but they only re­leased one pic­ture,” Young says. “Here’s a guy out there fish­ing, with no qualms. He’s like, ‘You don’t like it? Tough.’ Then he’d es­cal­ate and do more.”

His posts on Putin brought in great traffic, so his ed­it­or kept en­cour­aging him to es­cal­ate. Soon, Young was de­clar­ing his “man crush” on the Rus­si­an pres­id­ent. (“I hate to use that word, es­pe­cially on a hunt­ing web­site,” he ad­mits.) He called the Rus­si­an con­su­late, flir­ted with the right sec­ret­ary, and went through “hoop after hoop after hoop” un­til, one Fri­day, a press at­taché called and told him the pres­id­ent wanted his ques­tions in the next 20 minutes.

Young scrambled and sent something over. Six weeks later, Putin replied with an al­most un­be­liev­able 8,000-word missive — cov­er­ing everything from ti­ger con­ser­va­tion to his fa­vor­ite works of Hem­ing­way to the in­nate frailty of hu­man life. He lec­tured on the sim­il­ar­it­ies between Rus­si­ans and Amer­ic­ans, and de­murred from an­swer­ing Young’s friend­li­est ques­tions. (“Are you the coolest man in polit­ics?”) “People really liked him, at least on our com­ments sec­tion on Out­door Life,” Young says. “Giv­en the demo­graph­ics of the read­er­ship, most are die-hard Re­pub­lic­ans,” and when they saw Putin hunt­ing, he says, “they were like, ‘Obama wouldn’t do that.’ “

Putin­phil­ia is not, of course, the pre­dom­in­ant po­s­i­tion of the con­ser­vat­ive move­ment. But in cer­tain corners of the In­ter­net, ad­or­a­tion for the lead­er of Amer­ica’s No. 1 frenemy is un­ex­cep­tion­al. They are not his coun­try­men, Rus­si­an ex­pats, or any of the oth­er re­gion­al al­lies you might ex­pect to find al­lied with the Rus­si­an lead­er. Some, like Young and his read­ers, are earn­est out­doorsy types who like Putin’s Rough Rider sens­ib­il­ity. Oth­ers more cheekily ad­mire Putin’s cult of mas­culin­ity and claim re­l­at­ive in­dif­fer­ence to the polit­ic­al stances — the anti-Amer­ic­an­ism, the sup­port for lead­ers like Bashar al-As­sad, the op­pres­sion of minor­it­ies, gays, journ­al­ists, dis­sid­ents, in­de­pend­ent-minded ol­ig­archs — that drive most Amer­ic­ans mad. A few even ar­rive at their Putin ad­mir­a­tion through a strange brew of an­ti­pathy to everything they think Pres­id­ent Obama stands for, a re­flex­ive dis­trust of what the gov­ern­ment and me­dia tells them, and polit­ic­al be­liefs that go un­rep­res­en­ted by either of the main Amer­ic­an polit­ic­al parties.

They ut­terly per­plex many ob­serv­ers of the Rus­si­an-Amer­ic­an re­la­tion­ship. “No clue as to what drives it, oth­er than some form of ill­ness,” says Rus­si­an-born nov­el­ist Gary Shteyn­gart, au­thor of Ab­surdistan.

There are many faux Putin fans in Amer­ica — those who mock the hero wor­ship iron­ic­ally or half-iron­ic­ally. But plenty of his fans are ser­i­ous. Three months ago, Amer­ic­ans for Putin, a Face­book group, sprang up “for Amer­ic­ans who ad­mire many of the policies and the lead­er­ship style of Rus­si­an Pres­id­ent Vladi­mir Vladi­mirovich Putin” and think he “sounds bet­ter than the Re­pub­li­crat es­tab­lish­ment.” The group has an eight-point policy plat­form call­ing for “a uni­fied [Amer­ic­an] na­tion­al cul­ture,” a “firm stance against Is­raeli im­per­i­al­ism,” and an op­pos­i­tion to the polit­ic­al cor­rect­ness it says dom­in­ates Wash­ing­ton. Though that group is re­l­at­ively small (167 likes as of Wed­nes­day af­ter­noon, tick­ing up every few hours), the Obama’s-so-bad-Putin-al­most-looks-good sen­ti­ment can be found on plenty of con­ser­vat­ive mes­sage boards. Earli­er this year, when Putin sup­posedly caught — and kissed — a 46-pound pike fish, posters on Free Re­pub­lic, a ma­jor grass­roots mes­sage board for the Right, were over­whelm­ingly pro-Putin:

“I won­der what photoup [sic] of his va­ca­tion will the Usurp­er show us? Maybe clip­ping his fin­ger­nails I sup­pose or maybe hanging some cur­tains. Yep manly. I can’t be­lieve I’m sid­ing with Putin,” one wrote. “I have Pres­id­ent envy,” an­oth­er said. “Bet­ter than our met­ro­sexu­al pres­id­ent,” said a third. One riffed that a Putin-Sarah Pal­in tick­et would lead to a more mor­al United States.

The cult of Putin in Amer­ica prob­ably has its strongest hold on the read­ers of os­tens­ibly apolit­ic­al hu­mor sites that tar­get young men, such as Cracked and theCh­ive. Cracked‘s post on why Putin is “The World’s Cra­zi­est Ba­dass” drew more than 1 mil­lion views. TheCh­ive‘s slide show nam­ing Putin “The Real Life Most In­ter­est­ing Man in the World” in­spired sev­er­al hun­dred com­ments — only a few from Putin-haters dis­tressed to see that he had such a fol­low­ing.

Putin is hardly the first — or the worst — an­ti­hero to en­joy the de­vo­tion of a small seg­ment of Amer­ic­ans. Nor is he the first to be­ne­fit from a deep, re­flex­ive dis­trust of pub­lic in­sti­tu­tions like the gov­ern­ment or me­dia. The most re­cent and dis­con­cert­ing ex­ample is the hero wor­ship of Bo­ston Mara­thon sus­pect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, who has a cult fol­low­ing on­line. Many doubt law en­force­ment’s as­ser­tion of his guilt; oth­ers cre­ate Tumblr pages wor­ship­ping him like the latest teen­age pop star.

As for Young, re­cent years have tested the man-crush. He still thinks the guy he in­ter­viewed would make a great fish­ing part­ner, but he dis­likes the “saber rat­tling” he sees between Putin and Obama. “A lot of people in the out­doors world will say to me, ‘Hey look what your boy Putin is do­ing now. I al­ways re­spond: ‘It’s Vlad, and I’m not sure that’s the real one,’ ” Young says.  “It’s really hard for me right now, with what all is go­ing on, to say which Putin he really is. I would like to say he’s the one who answered my ques­tions.”

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4441) }}

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
4 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
5 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×