Coal-State Democrats a Dying Breed

Rep.-elect Bill Enyart, D-Ill. is seen on stage during a news conference with newly elected Democratic House members, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Nov. 13, 2012. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)
National Journal
Alex Brown
Sept. 22, 2013, 8:46 a.m.

Just as mod­er­ates of all stripes are be­ing squeezed out of an in­creas­ingly po­lar­ized Con­gress, House Demo­crats who openly sup­port the coal in­dustry are fast be­com­ing an en­dangered spe­cies.

In the last Con­gress, 14 Demo­crats were proud mem­bers of the Con­gres­sion­al Coal Caucus, an un­of­fi­cial co­ali­tion of coal-state House mem­bers that was or­gan­ized in 2010 and has be­come in­creas­ingly dom­in­ated by Re­pub­lic­ans.

This year, as the En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion Agency steps up pres­sure on coal-fired power plants to re­duce the car­bon emis­sions linked to cli­mate change, the num­ber of Demo­crats in the caucus has dwindled to six.

The co­chair of the coal caucus, Rep. Shel­ley Moore Capito, R-W.Va., is troubled by the grow­ing im­bal­ance in a group that now boasts 67 Re­pub­lic­an mem­bers.

“We need it to be bi­par­tis­an. We’ve been try­ing to ramp up our Demo­crat­ic mem­ber­ship, es­pe­cially in light of what happened today,” Capito said Fri­day after EPA un­veiled pro­posed reg­u­la­tions to con­trol green­house-gas emis­sions from new power plants. The rules, if made fi­nal as planned by the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion, will hit hard­est on coal-fired plants and could sig­ni­fic­antly harm the coal in­dustry.

Fresh­man Demo­crat­ic Rep. Bill En­yart, whose south­ern Illinois dis­trict is a big coal-pro­du­cer, didn’t hes­it­ate to join the caucus after his Janu­ary swear­ing-in. “I think it’s ab­so­lutely crit­ic­al that [coal-coun­try res­id­ents] have Demo­crats rep­res­ent­ing them,” En­yart said. “Who bet­ter to have in­flu­ence in a Demo­crat­ic ad­min­is­tra­tion?”

But the ad­min­is­tra­tion En­yart hopes to in­flu­ence is one that some in his party feel has aban­doned coal-coun­try Demo­crats, leav­ing them to fend for them­selves. Former Rep. Ben Chand­ler, D-Ky., is one, after los­ing a reelec­tion bid last fall to Re­pub­lic­an Andy Barr, who zer­oed in on Chand­ler’s sup­port for a cap-and-trade plan to re­duce green­house-gas emis­sions pushed by Pres­id­ent Obama in 2009.

“It was vir­tu­ally im­possible for me to sep­ar­ate my­self from [the na­tion­al Demo­crat­ic Party],” Chand­ler said. “It wasn’t an ac­ci­dent that the pres­id­ent was the star at­trac­tion of my op­pon­ent’s ads.

“I tried to talk to people about that, and nobody wanted to hear it,” he said. “They had made up their mind that any­thing that was done with the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion had to be bad for coal. There’s a na­tion­al policy that has been de­mon­ized in [coal] areas.”

An­oth­er factor hurt­ing mod­er­ate Demo­crats, Chand­ler said, is the coal in­dustry’s ri­gid lit­mus tests. “If you’re in coal coun­try, you’ve got to sup­port the coal in­dustry 100 per­cent,” he said. “Ninety-nine per­cent won’t get it done…. I’ve been very sup­port­ive of the coal in­dustry and coal jobs, but at the same time I voted for the cap-and-trade law.”

Former Rep. Jason Alt­mire, D-Pa., may know bet­ter than any­one the chal­lenges of a coal-coun­try Demo­crat. Thanks to re­dis­trict­ing, Alt­mire was lumped in­to a dis­trict with an­oth­er Demo­crat, then-Rep. Mark Critz, and was tar­geted by en­vir­on­ment­al and labor groups for his mod­er­ate votes. Alt­mire lost the primary in a tight cam­paign, then watched Critz face off against Re­pub­lic­an Keith Roth­fus, who linked him to Obama’s “war on coal.” Critz ran ads high­light­ing his splits with Obama on en­ergy policy and earned nearly 10 times more fin­an­cial sup­port from the coal in­dustry; it still wasn’t enough to over­come the dis­trict’s 9-point Re­pub­lic­an edge.

“People in Con­gress are rep­res­ent­ing dis­tricts that are drawn in a way that the ex­tremes hold the in­flu­ence,” Alt­mire said. “Most mem­bers who are in Con­gress rep­res­ent dis­tricts where the only thing they hear is one-sided.” That hurts swing-dis­trict mem­bers, he said, when lead­ers push is­sues that ex­cite their base but turn off con­ser­vat­ives and in­de­pend­ents.

Los­ing two Demo­crats in a single dis­trict, he said, should give the party pause as it weighs its en­ergy agenda. “Both [Critz and I] were in the Coal Caucus, and now we’ve been re­placed by [a mem­ber who is] much fur­ther to the right,” Alt­mire said.  “The party might want to take a look at that…. Do you feel like you got what you wanted there?”

En­yart said coal-state Demo­crats were hurt by the na­tion­ally fun­ded “war on coal” cam­paign de­signed to hurt Obama. “It was a purely par­tis­an is­sue aimed at pres­id­en­tial polit­ics,” he said. “I don’t be­lieve that the pres­id­ent had a war on coal,” but the per­cep­tion was strong among many voters.

Capito said the ad­min­is­tra­tion was re­spons­ible for some Demo­crat­ic losses. “A lot of them lost along the Ohio River and south­w­est Vir­gin­ia, so I would say ab­so­lutely” that the pres­id­ent’s policies hurt Demo­crats, she said. “You can’t de­fend it.”

A Demo­crat­ic op­er­at­ive in Pennsylvania, who re­ques­ted an­onym­ity to pro­tect a cur­rent can­did­ate, said Demo­crat­ic lead­er­ship isn’t en­tirely to blame for the party’s losses in coal coun­try. “The one thing [former Speak­er] Nancy Pelosi nev­er did was push the Demo­crats in [coal] re­gions on these is­sues,” he said. “Her philo­sophy was ‘take care of your dis­trict first.’ [Mem­bers] nev­er got any blow­back from Demo­crat­ic lead­er­ship on [in­de­pend­ent] votes.”

Alt­mire took a dif­fer­ent view. “If [na­tion­al Demo­crats], as they have done in the past, try to pun­ish the coal Demo­crats for their votes, there are un­in­ten­ded con­sequences in the form of tea-party Re­pub­lic­ans who will take over those seats and nev­er vote with the Demo­crats.”

The oth­er Demo­crats cur­rently in the coal caucus are Reps. Nick Ra­hall of West Vir­gin­ia, San­ford Bish­op of Geor­gia, Mike Doyle of Pennsylvania, Jim Math­eson of Utah, and Tim Ry­an of Ohio. None re­spon­ded to re­quests for com­ment on the caucus, but Ra­hall and En­yart did send out press re­leases cri­ti­ciz­ing the new EPA coal-plant reg­u­la­tions.

At least one coal-in­dustry lead­er said Demo­crats who sup­port coal shouldn’t suf­fer be­cause of their polit­ic­al af­fil­i­ation. “I’m dis­ap­poin­ted that coal has be­come such a polit­ic­ally charged is­sue,” said Ohio Coal As­so­ci­ation Pres­id­ent Zane Daniels. “It shouldn’t be labeled a ‘Re­pub­lic­an’ or ‘Demo­crat’ is­sue.” Still, the Ohio Coal As­so­ci­ation’s PAC gave to 15 can­did­ates in 2012, and all of them were Re­pub­lic­ans.

An­oth­er group, Coal­Blue, is a co­ali­tion of Demo­crats ad­voc­at­ing for coal’s place in Amer­ica’s en­ergy fu­ture. The group’s pres­id­ent, Jon Wood, has seen the dif­fi­culty fa­cing his party’s coal-coun­try mem­bers. “The dis­tricts where [Demo­crat­ic] mem­bers of the coal caucus are from tend to be swing dis­tricts,” he said. “This is the dif­fi­culty of a cent­rist in a po­lar­ized world. People in the middle are the ones who get squeezed out.”

CLA­RI­FIC­A­TION: This story was up­dated to make clear that Jason Alt­mire was re­fer­ring to Mark Critz when he was talk­ing about the loss of two Demo­crats in a single dis­trict.

What We're Following See More »
BACKING OUT ON BERNIE
Trump Won’t Debate Sanders After All
2 days ago
THE LATEST

Trump, in a statement: “Based on the fact that the Democratic nominating process is totally rigged and Crooked Hillary Clinton and Deborah Wasserman Schultz will not allow Bernie Sanders to win, and now that I am the presumptive Republican nominee, it seems inappropriate that I would debate the second place finisher. ... I will wait to debate the first place finisher in the Democratic Party, probably Crooked Hillary Clinton, or whoever it may be.”

AKNOWLEDGING THE INEVITABLE
UAW: Time to Unite Behind Hillary
4 days ago
THE DETAILS

"It's about time for unity," said UAW President Dennis Williams. "We're endorsing Hillary Clinton. She's gotten 3 million more votes than Bernie, a million more votes than Donald Trump. She's our nominee." He called Sanders "a great friend of the UAW" while saying Trump "does not support the economic security of UAW families." Some 28 percent of UAW members indicated their support for Trump in an internal survey.

Source:
AP KEEPING COUNT
Trump Clinches Enough Delegates for the Nomination
4 days ago
THE LATEST

"Donald Trump on Thursday reached the number of delegates needed to clinch the Republican nomination for president, completing an unlikely rise that has upended the political landscape and sets the stage for a bitter fall campaign. Trump was put over the top in the Associated Press delegate count by a small number of the party's unbound delegates who told the AP they would support him at the convention."

Source:
TRUMP FLOATED IDEA ON JIMMY KIMMEL’S SHOW
Trump/Sanders Debate Before California Primary?
4 days ago
THE LATEST
CAMPAIGNS INJECTED NEW AD MONEY
California: It’s Not Over Yet
4 days ago
THE LATEST

"Clinton and Bernie Sanders "are now devoting additional money to television advertising. A day after Sanders announced a new ad buy of less than $2 million in the state, Clinton announced her own television campaign. Ads featuring actor Morgan Freeman as well as labor leader and civil rights activist Dolores Huerta will air beginning on Fridayin Fresno, Sacramento, and Los Angeles media markets. Some ads will also target Latino voters and Asian American voters. The total value of the buy is about six figures according to the Clinton campaign." Meanwhile, a new poll shows Sanders within the margin of error, trailing Clinton 44%-46%.

Source:
×