When you’re endorsing a candidate, it’s best not to call her the “worst woman” for the job.
This is the mistake that EMILY’s List, a high-powered women’s rights group with deep pockets, made on Thursday on its website when trying to endorse Martha Coakley for Massachusetts governor. Here’s a screen shot of the page:
“Martha Coakley is a trailblazer who has shown unwavering commitment to serving her community and Massachusetts as a strong advocate and problem-solver for nearly three decades,” she said.
Coakley hasn’t had the best campaigning luck in recent years, and she’s trying to redeem herself from slipups during her 2010 Senate campaign against Republican Scott Brown.
During that campaign, Coakley was labeled as out of touch and an outsider. When she skipped town to attend a Washington fundraiser instead of continuing her campaign in the state, she justified it by saying, “As opposed to standing outside Fenway Park? In the cold? Shaking hands?” President Obama reportedly grabbed his adviser David Axelrod, shouting, “No! No! You’re making that up! That can’t be right! Tell me she didn’t say that!” according to Jonathan Alter in his book The Promise.
And it didn’t stop there. When Boston Red Sox great Curt Schilling endorsed Brown, she called the World Series-winning pitcher just “another Yankee fan.” That’s not something you say in Beantown.
What We're Following See More »
"The Trump administration is ending a humanitarian program that has allowed some 59,000 Haitians to live and work in the United States since an earthquake ravaged their country in 2010, Homeland Security officials said on Monday. Haitians with what is known as Temporary Protected Status will be expected to leave the United States by July 2019 or face deportation. ... About 320,000 people now benefit from the Temporary Protected Status program, which was signed into law by President George Bush in 1990."
"A federal judge on Monday permanently blocked President Donald Trump's executive order to cut funding from cities that limit cooperation with U.S. immigration authorities. U.S. District Court Judge William Orrick rejected the administration's argument that the executive order applies only to a relatively small pot of money and said Trump cannot set new conditions on spending approved by Congress. The judge had previously made the same arguments in a ruling that put a temporary hold on the executive order."