Why Starbucks Has to Step In on Guns

Starbucks’ firearms decision is the first step to setting boundaries for America’s gun-loving culture. Who will be next?

In this July 11, 2013 photo, a man drinks a Starbucks coffee in New York.
National Journal
Fawn Johnson
Sept. 19, 2013, 11:46 a.m.

The only way to re­duce gun vi­ol­ence in a coun­try that won’t give up its guns is to set cul­tur­al bound­ar­ies on what’s ac­cept­able and what’s not. And some mem­bers of cor­por­ate Amer­ica have real­ized it’s partly up to them to do that.

Star­bucks CEO Howard Shultz this week “re­spect­fully” asked cus­tom­ers not to bring guns in­to his es­tab­lish­ments. The re­quest is the latest, and per­haps highest-pro­file, ex­ample of fire­arm re­stric­tions put in place by cor­por­ate en­tit­ies for their cus­tom­ers. Star­bucks didn’t out­right ban weapons on its premises, but oth­er com­pan­ies like Whole Foods and Peet’s Cof­fee and Tea have banned them.

Even in open-carry states, such as Ari­zona, re­tail­ers routinely ask that weapons re­main off their premises. In Phoenix, for ex­ample, it is not un­com­mon to see signs on res­taur­ants stat­ing that fire­arms are not per­mit­ted in­side.

Gun-con­trol ad­voc­ates agree that chan­ging the coun­try’s cul­tur­al view of guns is an im­port­ant, and of­ten over­looked, factor in curb­ing gun vi­ol­ence. Leg­al changes alone, like ex­pan­ded back­ground checks, won’t stop gun-re­lated sui­cides or ac­ci­dents.

“You have to change so­cial norms,” said Dan Gross, pres­id­ent of the Brady Cam­paign to Pre­vent Gun Vi­ol­ence. “There’s not enough fo­cus on this big pic­ture. It doesn’t tend to drive enough of the con­ver­sa­tion his­tor­ic­ally.”

Cor­por­ate Amer­ica, par­tic­u­larly the re­tail sec­tor, has a lot of sway in terms of so­cial norms. And their ac­tions have the dis­tinct ad­vant­age of be­ing re­moved, at least a little bit, from the po­lar­ized polit­ic­al de­bate on gun con­trol.

Think about des­ig­nated smoking areas or dress codes at res­taur­ants. It’s a lot easi­er for a man­ager of a Star­bucks to tell a latte drink­er that it’s not cool to bring his gun in with him than it is for Con­gress or state Le­gis­latures to out­law them at all cof­fee shops.

The ad­vant­age of cor­por­ate policies on fire­arms is that they don’t get in the way of gun own­ers’ leg­al rights to pos­sess their weapons, and that’s im­port­ant for keep­ing the gun con­ver­sa­tion more or less open. Gun own­ers are on guard for any hint that their rights might be cur­tailed by the gov­ern­ment, and “gun own­ers drive this de­bate,” said Richard Feld­man, pres­id­ent of the In­de­pend­ent Fire­arm Own­ers As­so­ci­ation.

Gun-con­trol ad­voc­ates are try­ing to tone down the con­front­a­tion­al talk about the is­sue, says Gross. “We’re ac­know­ledging the guns that are already out there, re­af­firm­ing our re­spect for the reas­on why those people own guns.”

Gross says cul­tur­al change comes from edu­ca­tion about gun safety, un­der­stand­ing the risks and the be­ne­fits. Some 20,000 gun deaths a year are sui­cides with leg­ally pur­chased guns. Oth­ers are ac­ci­dents or crimes of pas­sion. “There, the solu­tion is not policy. There the solu­tion is pub­lic health and safety cam­paigns. There are risks as­so­ci­ated with bring­ing a gun in­to your home and al­low­ing un­safe ac­cess to it…. It’s like ‘Friends don’t let friends drive drunk,’ ” he said.

As Con­gress is stalled on gun le­gis­la­tion, ac­tions like Star­bucks’ open let­ter to its cus­tom­ers will be­come crit­ic­al in the de­bate over gun policy. Oth­er­wise, the na­tion­al con­ver­sa­tion about guns will sur­face only when something dra­mat­ic hap­pens, such as the mass shoot­ing at Wash­ing­ton’s Navy Yard.

Then, as the news cycle dwindles down, the top­ic will sink back in­to ob­scur­ity. But Star­bucks will still re­spect­fully ask you to leave your gun out­side.

What We're Following See More »
BACKING OUT ON BERNIE
Trump Won’t Debate Sanders After All
2 days ago
THE LATEST

Trump, in a statement: “Based on the fact that the Democratic nominating process is totally rigged and Crooked Hillary Clinton and Deborah Wasserman Schultz will not allow Bernie Sanders to win, and now that I am the presumptive Republican nominee, it seems inappropriate that I would debate the second place finisher. ... I will wait to debate the first place finisher in the Democratic Party, probably Crooked Hillary Clinton, or whoever it may be.”

AKNOWLEDGING THE INEVITABLE
UAW: Time to Unite Behind Hillary
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

"It's about time for unity," said UAW President Dennis Williams. "We're endorsing Hillary Clinton. She's gotten 3 million more votes than Bernie, a million more votes than Donald Trump. She's our nominee." He called Sanders "a great friend of the UAW" while saying Trump "does not support the economic security of UAW families." Some 28 percent of UAW members indicated their support for Trump in an internal survey.

Source:
AP KEEPING COUNT
Trump Clinches Enough Delegates for the Nomination
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"Donald Trump on Thursday reached the number of delegates needed to clinch the Republican nomination for president, completing an unlikely rise that has upended the political landscape and sets the stage for a bitter fall campaign. Trump was put over the top in the Associated Press delegate count by a small number of the party's unbound delegates who told the AP they would support him at the convention."

Source:
TRUMP FLOATED IDEA ON JIMMY KIMMEL’S SHOW
Trump/Sanders Debate Before California Primary?
3 days ago
THE LATEST
CAMPAIGNS INJECTED NEW AD MONEY
California: It’s Not Over Yet
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"Clinton and Bernie Sanders "are now devoting additional money to television advertising. A day after Sanders announced a new ad buy of less than $2 million in the state, Clinton announced her own television campaign. Ads featuring actor Morgan Freeman as well as labor leader and civil rights activist Dolores Huerta will air beginning on Fridayin Fresno, Sacramento, and Los Angeles media markets. Some ads will also target Latino voters and Asian American voters. The total value of the buy is about six figures according to the Clinton campaign." Meanwhile, a new poll shows Sanders within the margin of error, trailing Clinton 44%-46%.

Source:
×