As Mass Shootings Continue, Americans Divided on their Cause

It’s little wonder Congress hasn’t acted on the issue.

The crime scene where a number of people, including a 3-year-old child, were shot in a city park on the South Side of Chicago on Thursday.
National Journal
Matt Vasilogambros
Add to Briefcase
Matt Vasilogambros
Sept. 20, 2013, 8:41 a.m.

Around 10:15 Thursday night, 13 people were shot in a hail of bul­lets in a South Side bas­ket­ball court in Chica­go. Among those vic­tims was a 3-year-old boy, shot in the head near the ear, the bul­let ex­it­ing through his mouth. He re­mains in crit­ic­al con­di­tion at Mount Sinai Hos­pit­al.

It’s a tra­gic, but fa­mil­i­ar story for Chica­goans. Gun vi­ol­ence in the Windy City has pro­duced count­less, heart­break­ing im­ages of people who lost their lives to gang vi­ol­ence or ran­dom shoot­ings. In Janu­ary, the death of Hadiya Pendleton, a 15-year-old girl shot to death on her way home from school, shocked the city. Just a week later earli­er, she had at­ten­ded Pres­id­ent Obama’s in­aug­ur­a­tion with her high school march­ing band.

The Fed­er­al Bur­eau of In­vest­ig­a­tion re­leased its an­nu­al re­port this week on the num­ber of murders across the coun­try. It shows that Chica­go re­gistered more murders than any oth­er city in 2012, passing New York — a city with three times the num­ber of res­id­ents. The num­ber of murders in Chica­go in­creased from 431 in 2011 to 500 a year later. New York had 96 few­er murders than the year be­fore, with 419 murders in 2012.

But Amer­ic­ans still can’t de­cide why this hap­pens.

While much of the de­bate fol­low­ing the mass shoot­ing in the Wash­ing­ton Navy Yard has sur­roun­ded the level of se­cur­ity clear­ance for con­tract­ors and the men­tal-health sys­tem in this coun­try, there are still shoot­ings oc­cur­ring fre­quently across the coun­try, where those ar­gu­ments are ir­rel­ev­ant.

Polling shows that more Amer­ic­ans look to­ward oth­er factors for mass shoot­ings than ac­cess to weapons. Ac­cord­ing to a new Gal­lup Poll re­leased Fri­day, 48 per­cent of Amer­ic­ans blame the men­tal-health sys­tem for the mass shoot­ings; it was the No. 1 factor cited by those polled.

 

The poll shows that over the past two years, the num­ber of Amer­ic­ans who think easy ac­cess to guns is the reas­on for mass shoot­ings has de­clined. Gang af­fil­i­ations was not men­tioned in the polling.

There are also ma­jor di­vides among party lines about the causes of vi­ol­ence: 57 per­cent of Demo­crats blame easy ac­cess to guns, com­pared with just 22 per­cent of Re­pub­lic­ans. However, about half of both Re­pub­lic­ans and Demo­crats cite men­tal health as a ma­jor factor, as well.

The poll was con­duc­ted Sept. 17-18, just two days after the Navy Yard shoot­ing. That tim­ing may have skewed res­ults to fa­vor the men­tal health ar­gu­ment. What should be con­cern­ing for Demo­crat­ic law­makers who want to re­ignite the gun-con­trol de­bate is that sup­port for stricter laws is de­creas­ing. The poll shows that just 49 per­cent of Amer­ic­ans be­lieve there should be stricter laws on fire­arm sales, as com­pared with 58 per­cent who said that in the af­ter­math of the shoot­ing in New­town, Conn., in Decem­ber 2012.

But as Con­gress re­mains in­act­ive in the area of gun con­trol, and the Amer­ic­an pub­lic re­mains di­vided on a way for­ward to re­duce gun vi­ol­ence, the real­ity of these mass shoot­ings in cit­ies like Chica­go is likely to con­tin­ue.

What We're Following See More »
A CANDIDATE TO BE ‘PROUD’ OF
Chicago Tribune Endorses Gary Johnson
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."

FUNERAL FOR ISRAELI LEADER
Obama Compares Peres to ‘Giants of the 20th Century’
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Speaking at the funeral of former Israeli Prime Minister Shimon Peres, President Obama "compared Peres to 'other giants of the 20th century' such as Nelson Mandela and Queen Elizabeth who 'find no need to posture or traffic in what's popular in the moment.'" Among the 6,000 mourners at the service was Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. Obama called Abbas's presence a sign of the "unfinished business of peace" in the region.

Source:
THE QUESTION
How Many New Voters Does the Clinton Campaign Aim to Register?
2 hours ago
THE ANSWER

Three million—a number that lays "bare the significant gap between Donald Trump’s bare-bones operation and the field program that Clinton and her hundreds of aides have been building for some 17 months."

Source:
“STANDING FOR PRINCIPLES”
Chicago Tribune Endorses Johnson
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

In a somewhat shocking move, the Chicago Tribune has endorsed Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson for president, saying a vote for him is one that voters "can be proud of." The editorial barely touches on Donald Trump, who the paper has time and again called "unfit to be president," before offering a variety of reasons for why it can't endorse Hillary Clinton. Johnson has been in the news this week for being unable to name a single world leader who he admires, after earlier this month being unable to identify "Aleppo," a major Syrian city in the middle of the country's ongoing war.

Source:
NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
16 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
×