IAEA Meeting Rejects Arab Resolution Criticizing Israel’s Nukes

Global Security Newswire Staff
See more stories about...
Global Security Newswire Staff
Sept. 20, 2013, 9:02 a.m.

An Ar­ab-sponsored meas­ure cri­ti­ciz­ing Is­rael for its widely sus­pec­ted nuc­le­ar ar­sen­al failed on Fri­day to se­cure enough votes to pass at the In­ter­na­tion­al Atom­ic En­ergy Agency’s yearly gen­er­al mem­ber­ship meet­ing, Rus­sia Today re­por­ted.

The res­ol­u­tion lost by a vote of 43-51.

The non­bind­ing meas­ure is un­der­stood to have called on Is­rael to place all of its atom­ic sites un­der com­pre­hens­ive IAEA safe­guards and to join the Nuc­le­ar Non­pro­lif­er­a­tion Treaty as a non-nuc­le­ar coun­try. IAEA mem­ber states in 2009 passed a sim­il­ar res­ol­u­tion.

Wash­ing­ton earli­er this week cri­ti­cized the ef­fort to single Is­rael out for con­dem­na­tion after fail­ing to con­vince Ar­ab states from in­tro­du­cing the res­ol­u­tion.

Is­raeli nuc­le­ar en­ergy head Shaul Chorev charged that the Ar­ab res­ol­u­tion would only worsen “ex­ist­ing dis­trust” between Middle East­ern na­tions.

Is­rael is es­tim­ated to have 80 nuc­le­ar weapons, ac­cord­ing to a re­cent Bul­let­in of the Atom­ic Sci­ent­ists re­port. The Jew­ish state’s long­stand­ing policy has been to neither con­firm nor deny its pos­ses­sion of nuc­le­ar arms even as it re­peatedly cri­ti­cizes and threatens to at­tack Ir­an for its con­tro­ver­sial urani­um en­rich­ment activ­it­ies.

A U.N. ef­fort to con­vene a con­fer­ence for all Middle East­ern na­tions on es­tab­lish­ing weapons-of-mass-de­struc­tion-free zone for the re­gion nev­er came to fruition by a dead­line in 2012, largely due to Is­rael’s re­fus­al to con­firm its at­tend­ance.

Is­rael and the United States both con­tend it is un­reas­on­able to ex­pect any ad­vance­ments on a WMD-free zone in the re­gion as long as Ir­an con­tin­ues its dis­puted nuc­le­ar de­vel­op­ment and there is no over­arch­ing Ar­ab-Is­raeli peace agree­ment.

What We're Following See More »
AT LEAST NOT YET
Paul Ryan Can’t Get Behind Trump
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

Paul Ryan told CNN today he's "not ready" to back Donald Trump at this time. "I'm not there right now," he said. Ryan said Trump needs to unify "all wings of the Republican Party and the conservative movement" and then run a campaign that will allow Americans to "have something that they're proud to support and proud to be a part of. And we've got a ways to go from here to there."

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Preet Bharara Learned at the Foot of Chuck Schumer
3 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In The New Yorker, Jeffrey Toobin gives Preet Bharara, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, the longread treatment. The scourge of corrupt New York pols, bad actors on Wall Street, and New York gang members, Bharara learned at the foot of Chuck Schumer, the famously limelight-hogging senator whom he served as a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee staff. No surprise then, that after President Obama appointed him, Bharara "brought a media-friendly approach to what has historically been a closed and guarded institution. In professional background, Bharara resembles his predecessors; in style, he’s very different. His personality reflects his dual life in New York’s political and legal firmament. A longtime prosecutor, he sometimes acts like a budding pol; his rhetoric leans more toward the wisecrack than toward the jeremiad. He expresses himself in the orderly paragraphs of a former high-school debater, but with deft comic timing and a gift for shtick."

Source:
DRUG OFFENDERS
Obama Commutes the Sentences of 58 Prisoners
3 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama has announced another round of commutations of prison sentences. Most of the 58 individuals named are incarcerated for possessions with intent to distribute controlled substances. The prisoners will be released between later this year and 2018.

STAFF PICKS
Trump Roadmapped His Candidacy in 2000
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The Daily Beast has unearthed a piece that Donald Trump wrote for Gear magazine in 2000, which anticipates his 2016 sales pitch quite well. "Perhaps it's time for a dealmaker who can get the leaders of Congress to the table, forge consensus, and strike compromise," he writes. Oddly, he opens by defending his reputation as a womanizer: "The hypocrites argue that a man who loves and appreciates beautiful women (and does so legally and openly) shouldn't become a national leader? Is there something wrong with appreciating beautiful women? Don't we want people in public office who show signs of life?"

Source:
‘NO MORAL OR ETHICAL GROUNDING’
Sen. Murphy: Trump Shouldn’t Get Classified Briefigs
4 hours ago
THE LATEST
×