N. Korea May Have Domestic Centrifuge Production Capability

Global Security Newswire Staff
See more stories about...
Global Security Newswire Staff
Sept. 24, 2013, 6:02 a.m.

North Korea may have ac­quired the abil­ity to in­di­gen­ously man­u­fac­ture spe­cial­ized-gas cent­ri­fuges, which would en­hance its ef­forts to en­rich urani­um and fur­ther lim­it the in­ter­na­tion­al com­munity’s abil­ity to con­strain its nuc­le­ar-weapons work, the New York Times re­por­ted on Monday, cit­ing a new study.

The ana­lys­is by nuc­le­ar ex­perts Joshua Pol­lack and Scott Kemp comes amid oth­er in­dic­a­tions that Py­ongy­ang is mov­ing its nuc­le­ar-weapons pro­gram for­ward on mul­tiple fronts. Re­cently taken satel­lite pho­to­graphs show in­dic­a­tions of a pos­sible long-range rock­et-en­gine test and a formerly moth­balled plutoni­um-pro­duc­tion re­act­or ap­pears to have been re­star­ted.

The United States and oth­er na­tions have tried to lim­it North Korea’s abil­ity to en­rich urani­um by curb­ing its in­ter­na­tion­al ac­cess to the com­pon­ents and ma­ter­i­als needed to build ad­vanced cent­ri­fuges. If Py­ongy­ang were cap­able of build­ing cent­ri­fuges with parts it can loc­ally pro­duce, it would be much more dif­fi­cult for oth­er na­tions to es­tim­ate how much fis­sile ma­ter­i­al the North is cap­able of gen­er­at­ing. It would also be harder to be cer­tain it is abid­ing by de­nuc­lear­iz­a­tion prom­ises, should a new ac­cord ever be struck on the mat­ter.

“We won’t be in a good po­s­i­tion to spot them ex­pand­ing the pro­gram through for­eign shop­ping ex­ped­i­tions,” Pol­lack said. “Po­lices based on ex­port con­trols, sanc­tions and in­ter­dic­tion won’t get much trac­tion, either.”

“The deep­er im­plic­a­tion, if they are able to ex­pand the pro­gram un­checked, is that we’ll nev­er be too con­fid­ent that we know where all the cent­ri­fuges are. And that in turn could put a veri­fi­able de­nuc­lear­iz­a­tion deal out of reach,” he con­tin­ued.

Pol­lack said in­dic­a­tions sug­gest in­di­gen­ous pro­duc­tion of cent­ri­fuge parts star­ted at the latest four years ago. He and Kemp ex­amined pub­licly avail­able in­form­a­tion gathered from me­dia stor­ies, sci­entif­ic journ­als and re­gime an­nounce­ments to build the case that North Korea is fig­ur­ing out how to pro­duce nuc­le­ar pro­duc­tion-re­lated ma­ter­i­als and items such as va­cu­um pumps, mag­net­ic-top bear­ings, mar­aging steel, urani­um hex­a­flu­or­ide and fre­quency in­vert­ers.

U.S. nuc­le­ar weapons ex­pert Siegfried Heck­er in an e-mail to the Times said he be­lieves most of Pol­lack and Kemp’s ana­lys­is is cor­rect. However, he is less con­vinced of the evid­ence that Py­ongy­ang has the abil­ity to gen­er­ate high-qual­ity mar­aging steel — a par­tic­u­larly chal­len­ging part of the cent­ri­fuge man­u­fac­tur­ing pro­cess. “Hav­ing said that, if North Korea does in­deed double the size of its Yongby­on cent­ri­fuge plant … then the like­li­hood of in­di­gen­ous fab­ric­a­tion of mar­aging steel has in­creased,” he wrote.

In a sign of how con­cerned China is over North Korea’s con­tin­ued nuc­le­ar-weapons de­vel­op­ment, Beijing has taken the un­usu­al step of pub­li­ciz­ing its new ex­port con­trols for a range of “dual-use” items that Py­ongy­ang is now banned from im­port­ing, the As­so­ci­ated Press re­por­ted on Tues­day. The re­stric­tions cov­er ma­ter­i­als that can be ad­ap­ted to pro­duce bio­lo­gic­al, chem­ic­al and nuc­le­ar weapons as well as bal­list­ic mis­siles.

In­stead of just quietly rolling out the new trade re­stric­tions, Beijing made a point of pub­licly an­noun­cing them, Nan­yang Tech­no­lo­gic­al Uni­versity China se­cur­ity spe­cial­ist Li Mingji­ang said.

“The lead­ers in Py­ongy­ang will hate this. They’ll be angry,” ac­cord­ing to the ex­pert.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
12 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
13 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.

Source:
×