Why the GOP Is on Cruz Control

Despite rejection and mockery from party leaders, Texas Ted’s brazenness is apt for the times

Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, speaks at a news conference with conservative Congressional Republicans who persuaded the House leadership to include defunding the Affordable Care Act in legislation to prevent a government shutdown, at the Capitol, Sept. 19, 2013.
National Journal
Michael Hirsh
Sept. 24, 2013, 10:29 a.m.

As he re­minds us so of­ten, Ted Cruz is really smart — smarter than the rest of us — and so it may well be that he’s pur­su­ing the smartest route to the pres­id­ency in this age of de­grin­golade. (That’s a su­per-smart term, one Cruz might use, mean­ing “the rap­id col­lapse of the old power struc­ture.”) Cruz real­izes, maybe more than the GOP lead­er­ship he is tak­ing on, that the fu­ture of the frac­tious Re­pub­lic­an Party is com­pletely in play. The House- and dis­trict-dir­ec­ted GOP base no longer cares at all what the “na­tion­al lead­ers” or strategists in Wash­ing­ton think; na­tion­al con­tenders who tra­di­tion­ally might have had to earn their way to the nom­in­a­tion a la Mitt Rom­ney or Mitch Daniels are no longer treated with much re­spect. Even Marco Ru­bio, not long ago a wun­der­kind in­sur­gent him­self, is com­ing off like a jaded Wash­ing­to­ni­an fuddy-duddy these days com­pared with the Cruz Ex­press.

For sheer brazen­ness, there is noth­ing in memory to com­pare with Ted Cruz. If Barack Obama set a new bar in the Demo­crat­ic Party by grand­stand­ing his way to the pres­id­ency after only two years in the Sen­ate — with less polit­ic­al ex­per­i­ence or ac­com­plish­ment than al­most any ma­jor can­did­ate be­fore him — Cruz is out­do­ing even Obama in his flag­rant at­tempt to cre­ate a na­tion­al repu­ta­tion out of lit­er­ally noth­ing, with less than one year in of­fice. He’s Sarah Pal­in with an Ivy League ped­i­gree, and ap­par­ently even less shame.

By all ap­pear­ances, Cruz’s main ob­ject­ive is not to take on Obama and the Demo­crats (that’s just a tac­tic), but to oust the old guard in his own party — even faster than the Tea Party in­sur­gency sought to do after 2010. Ac­cord­ing to seni­or-level Re­pub­lic­an op­er­at­ives, Cruz talks frankly of clear­ing his way for a pres­id­en­tial run, even as he de­rides, without any sense of irony, the “van­ity” of his fel­low sen­at­ors. As The Wash­ing­ton Post noted on Monday, cit­ing GOP seni­or aides and sen­at­ors, Cruz is seek­ing to “puri­fy the party.”

That is why Cruz seems not to care at all — in fact, he’s quite de­lighted, writer Jason Zengerle points out — that he pro­voked party li­on John Mc­Cain in­to call­ing him a “wacko bird” for reck­lessly smear­ing Chuck Hagel and fili­bus­ter­ing John Bren­nan. As reneg­ade con­ser­vat­ive pun­dit Dav­id Frum writes ap­prov­ingly of Cruz, “The plan is ob­vi­ous enough: to emerge as the next ac­know­ledged polit­ic­al lead­er of Amer­ic­an con­ser­vat­ism in the apostol­ic suc­ces­sion that be­gins with Robert Taft, con­tin­ued through Barry Gold­wa­ter and Ron­ald Re­agan and Jack Kemp, and has had no agreed suc­cessor since Newt Gin­grich’s re­tire­ment from Con­gress in 1998.”

This is no doubt why, in his grasp­ing at head­lines, Cruz is already sev­er­al de­grees of sep­ar­a­tion away from what most of the coun­try wants, and he seems not to care a whit. Ac­cord­ing to the latest United Tech­no­lo­gies/Na­tion­al Journ­al Con­gres­sion­al Con­nec­tion Poll, a sol­id ma­jor­ity of Amer­ic­ans think the ap­proach that the House and Sen­ate GOP lead­er­ship is now pur­su­ing is too rad­ic­al: They don’t wish the debt-lim­it is­sue to be tied to le­gis­la­tion that might delay or de­fund Obama­care. Yet Cruz is go­ing even bey­ond that lead­er­ship strategy in say­ing he will fili­buster his party’s own House bill in a quix­ot­ic ef­fort to pre­vent Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id from strip­ping the Obama­care-de­fund­ing pro­vi­sion from the bill after a clo­ture vote. This will en­sure Cruz head­lines for a few more days run­ning up to the Oct. 1 in­sur­ance-ex­change dead­line.

Even former Re­pub­lic­an House lead­ers who sup­por­ted the Tea Party are aghast at the chaos Cruz and oth­er new in­sur­gents have caused, my col­league Jill Lawrence points out. Former Gin­grich Re­volu­tion stal­wart Dick Armey says he feels bad about all the little Franken­stein mon­sters he cre­ated with his Tea Party-friendly Freedom­Works PAC. “Freedom­Works has kind of gone to an ex­treme level of an­im­os­ity” to­ward vet­er­an House elites, he told Lawrence, “by telling these old guys to just buzz off.”

Is this a fright­en­ing phe­nomen­on, or is it merely a sign of the times? Both, per­haps. It is scary that the art of gov­ernance ap­pears to be dy­ing out, partly a vic­tim of the GOP’s Cul­tur­al Re­volu­tion. It is also un­set­tling to re­call that a half cen­tury ago John F. Kennedy was ri­diculed for be­ing un­ready for the pres­id­ency after win­ning two terms in the Sen­ate and three in the House.

Yet as dis­tress­ing as this bot­tom-rail-on-top ap­proach to polit­ics seems, and as crazy as Cruz some­times sounds, there is his­tor­ic­al reas­on for this shift. The truth is that pre­vi­ous gen­er­a­tions of Re­pub­lic­an in­sur­gents, spe­cific­ally in­clud­ing Gin­grich and go­ing back to the hal­lowed Ron­ald Re­agan, have failed to rein in the size of gov­ern­ment. That’s why the Tea Party in­sur­gency, des­pite many hope­ful at­tempts to note its de­mise, is no passing phe­nomen­on, as Cruz seems to have real­ized. And why Ted Cruz may be here for a long time to come.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4463) }}

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×