Why the GOP Is on Cruz Control

Despite rejection and mockery from party leaders, Texas Ted’s brazenness is apt for the times

Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, speaks at a news conference with conservative Congressional Republicans who persuaded the House leadership to include defunding the Affordable Care Act in legislation to prevent a government shutdown, at the Capitol, Sept. 19, 2013.
National Journal
Add to Briefcase
Michael Hirsh
Sept. 24, 2013, 10:29 a.m.

As he re­minds us so of­ten, Ted Cruz is really smart — smarter than the rest of us — and so it may well be that he’s pur­su­ing the smartest route to the pres­id­ency in this age of de­grin­golade. (That’s a su­per-smart term, one Cruz might use, mean­ing “the rap­id col­lapse of the old power struc­ture.”) Cruz real­izes, maybe more than the GOP lead­er­ship he is tak­ing on, that the fu­ture of the frac­tious Re­pub­lic­an Party is com­pletely in play. The House- and dis­trict-dir­ec­ted GOP base no longer cares at all what the “na­tion­al lead­ers” or strategists in Wash­ing­ton think; na­tion­al con­tenders who tra­di­tion­ally might have had to earn their way to the nom­in­a­tion a la Mitt Rom­ney or Mitch Daniels are no longer treated with much re­spect. Even Marco Ru­bio, not long ago a wun­der­kind in­sur­gent him­self, is com­ing off like a jaded Wash­ing­to­ni­an fuddy-duddy these days com­pared with the Cruz Ex­press.

For sheer brazen­ness, there is noth­ing in memory to com­pare with Ted Cruz. If Barack Obama set a new bar in the Demo­crat­ic Party by grand­stand­ing his way to the pres­id­ency after only two years in the Sen­ate — with less polit­ic­al ex­per­i­ence or ac­com­plish­ment than al­most any ma­jor can­did­ate be­fore him — Cruz is out­do­ing even Obama in his flag­rant at­tempt to cre­ate a na­tion­al repu­ta­tion out of lit­er­ally noth­ing, with less than one year in of­fice. He’s Sarah Pal­in with an Ivy League ped­i­gree, and ap­par­ently even less shame.

By all ap­pear­ances, Cruz’s main ob­ject­ive is not to take on Obama and the Demo­crats (that’s just a tac­tic), but to oust the old guard in his own party — even faster than the Tea Party in­sur­gency sought to do after 2010. Ac­cord­ing to seni­or-level Re­pub­lic­an op­er­at­ives, Cruz talks frankly of clear­ing his way for a pres­id­en­tial run, even as he de­rides, without any sense of irony, the “van­ity” of his fel­low sen­at­ors. As The Wash­ing­ton Post noted on Monday, cit­ing GOP seni­or aides and sen­at­ors, Cruz is seek­ing to “puri­fy the party.”

That is why Cruz seems not to care at all — in fact, he’s quite de­lighted, writer Jason Zengerle points out — that he pro­voked party li­on John Mc­Cain in­to call­ing him a “wacko bird” for reck­lessly smear­ing Chuck Hagel and fili­bus­ter­ing John Bren­nan. As reneg­ade con­ser­vat­ive pun­dit Dav­id Frum writes ap­prov­ingly of Cruz, “The plan is ob­vi­ous enough: to emerge as the next ac­know­ledged polit­ic­al lead­er of Amer­ic­an con­ser­vat­ism in the apostol­ic suc­ces­sion that be­gins with Robert Taft, con­tin­ued through Barry Gold­wa­ter and Ron­ald Re­agan and Jack Kemp, and has had no agreed suc­cessor since Newt Gin­grich’s re­tire­ment from Con­gress in 1998.”

This is no doubt why, in his grasp­ing at head­lines, Cruz is already sev­er­al de­grees of sep­ar­a­tion away from what most of the coun­try wants, and he seems not to care a whit. Ac­cord­ing to the latest United Tech­no­lo­gies/Na­tion­al Journ­al Con­gres­sion­al Con­nec­tion Poll, a sol­id ma­jor­ity of Amer­ic­ans think the ap­proach that the House and Sen­ate GOP lead­er­ship is now pur­su­ing is too rad­ic­al: They don’t wish the debt-lim­it is­sue to be tied to le­gis­la­tion that might delay or de­fund Obama­care. Yet Cruz is go­ing even bey­ond that lead­er­ship strategy in say­ing he will fili­buster his party’s own House bill in a quix­ot­ic ef­fort to pre­vent Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id from strip­ping the Obama­care-de­fund­ing pro­vi­sion from the bill after a clo­ture vote. This will en­sure Cruz head­lines for a few more days run­ning up to the Oct. 1 in­sur­ance-ex­change dead­line.

Even former Re­pub­lic­an House lead­ers who sup­por­ted the Tea Party are aghast at the chaos Cruz and oth­er new in­sur­gents have caused, my col­league Jill Lawrence points out. Former Gin­grich Re­volu­tion stal­wart Dick Armey says he feels bad about all the little Franken­stein mon­sters he cre­ated with his Tea Party-friendly Freedom­Works PAC. “Freedom­Works has kind of gone to an ex­treme level of an­im­os­ity” to­ward vet­er­an House elites, he told Lawrence, “by telling these old guys to just buzz off.”

Is this a fright­en­ing phe­nomen­on, or is it merely a sign of the times? Both, per­haps. It is scary that the art of gov­ernance ap­pears to be dy­ing out, partly a vic­tim of the GOP’s Cul­tur­al Re­volu­tion. It is also un­set­tling to re­call that a half cen­tury ago John F. Kennedy was ri­diculed for be­ing un­ready for the pres­id­ency after win­ning two terms in the Sen­ate and three in the House.

Yet as dis­tress­ing as this bot­tom-rail-on-top ap­proach to polit­ics seems, and as crazy as Cruz some­times sounds, there is his­tor­ic­al reas­on for this shift. The truth is that pre­vi­ous gen­er­a­tions of Re­pub­lic­an in­sur­gents, spe­cific­ally in­clud­ing Gin­grich and go­ing back to the hal­lowed Ron­ald Re­agan, have failed to rein in the size of gov­ern­ment. That’s why the Tea Party in­sur­gency, des­pite many hope­ful at­tempts to note its de­mise, is no passing phe­nomen­on, as Cruz seems to have real­ized. And why Ted Cruz may be here for a long time to come.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.