WASHINGTON — President Obama carefully calibrated his Tuesday remarks at the United Nations to leave room for a long-sought compromise with Iran on its disputed nuclear program, analysts told Global Security Newswire.
He delivered his speech to the U.N. General Assembly as previously skeptical Western observers were growing increasingly optimistic about improving ties with Iran. Their sentiments wert sparked by overtures from President Hassan Rouhani, who took office last month pledging to win his country relief from harsh sanctions imposed on it because of its atomic effort. Iran insists the program is peaceful, but Washington and its allies worry it could help Tehran obtain a nuclear-arms capacity.
Recent statements by Tehran and Washington “should offer the basis for a meaningful agreement,” the president said at the U.N. General Assembly. He noted that the top diplomats from Iran and the United States are expected to attend a Thursday meeting to address the nuclear issue.
Analysts said Obama’s remarks hinted at a significant desire for a deal on the nuclear standoff.
John Tirman, head of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Center for International Studies, said it’s “to be expected” that Obama maximized his position by pressing Iran to abide by U.N. Security Council resolutions that call in part for Iran to fully suspend uranium enrichment, even though Tehran has consistently demanded acknowledgement of its legal right to refine the substance for peaceful use.
Any nuclear compromise, though, would ultimately permit “some enrichment,” he said.
Tirman said any agreement would most likely also call for “control or disposal” of Iran’s most bomb-usable uranium, as well as would be “full-scope” international audits to ensure Tehran is not tapping its atomic assets for military ends.
None of the president’s comments on Iran was “actually new,” but their “context matters,” Brookings Institution Iran expert Suzanne Maloney said in a tweet. She noted that Obama established a “positive linkage” between the nuclear dispute and the Israeli-Palestinian peace process.
Obama’s address marked “the most serious public outreach to resolve disputes with Iran since the 1979 revolution” that overthrew the U.S.-backed government in Tehran, Robin Wright, a senior fellow with the U.S. Institute of Peace, told GSN in an e-mail.
“Obama clearly sought balance,” she said. “His overture acknowledged past American attempts to manipulate Iranian politics, notably the CIA-orchestrated coup against a democratically elected government in 1953.”
“Now, she said, Washington is not out to change the regime in Tehran. But Obama also pointed out the many transgressions by the revolutionary regime, including seizing the American embassy in 1979 and backing extremist movements that have targeted many Americans.”
Israel has voiced open skepticism of Iran’s gestures toward rapprochement. Last week, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu pressed for Tehran to relinquish all its enriched uranium and halt all production of the material.
What We're Following See More »
House Speaker Paul Ryan today is trying to convince his large but divided conference that they need to pass a budget under regular order. “Conservatives are revolting against higher top-line spending levels negotiated last fall by President Obama and Ryan’s predecessor, then-Speaker John Boehner (R-OH). GOP centrists are digging in on the other side, pledging to kill any budget that deviates from the two-year, bipartisan budget deal.” Ryan’s three options are to lower the budget numbers to appease the Freedom Caucus, “deem” a budget and move on to the appropriations process, or “preserve Obama-Boehner levels, but seek savings elsewhere.”
“A bill headed for President Barack Obama this week includes a provision that would ban U.S. imports of fish caught by slaves in Southeast Asia, gold mined by children in Africa and garments sewn by abused women in Bangladesh, closing a loophole in an 85-year-old tariff law.” The Senate approved the bill, which would also ban Internet taxes and overhaul trade laws, by a vote of 75-20. It now goes to President Obama.
Bernie Sanders has closed to within seven points of Hillary Clinton in a new Morning Consult survey. Clinton leads 46%-39%. Consistent with the New Hampshire voting results, Clinton does best with retirees, while Sanders leads by 20 percentage points among those under 30. On the Republican side, Donald Trump is far ahead with 44% support. Trailing by a huge margin are Ted Cruz (17%), Ben Carson (10%) and Marco Rubio (10%).
President Obama became a surprise topic of contention toward the end of the Democratic debate, as Hillary Clinton reminded viewers that Sanders had challenged the progressive bona fides of President Obama in 2011 and suggested that someone might challenge him from the left. “The kind of criticism that we’ve heard from Senator Sanders about our president I expect from Republicans, I do not expect from someone running for the Democratic nomination to succeed President Obama,” she said. “Madame Secretary, that is a low blow,” replied Sanders, before getting in another dig during his closing statement: “One of us ran against Barack Obama. I was not that candidate.”
It’s all about the 1% and Wall Street versus everyone else for Bernie Sanders—even when he’s talking about race relations. Like Hillary Clinton, he needs to appeal to African-American and Hispanic voters in coming states, but he insists on doing so through his lens of class warfare. When he got a question from the moderators about the plight of black America, he noted that during the great recession, African Americans “lost half their wealth,” and “instead of tax breaks for billionaires,” a Sanders presidency would deliver jobs for kids. On the very next question, he downplayed the role of race in inequality, saying, “It’s a racial issue, but it’s also a general economic issue.”