Obama’s Pick for Ambassador to Canada Likely to Be Grilled on Keystone Pipeline

National Journal
Alex Brown
Add to Briefcase
Alex Brown
Sept. 24, 2013, 5 p.m.

If Bruce Hey­man wants to be the next am­bas­sad­or to Canada, he should prob­ably start pre­par­ing to an­swer some ques­tions about the Key­stone XL pipeline. But it may be too soon to ex­pect the pro­ject’s Demo­crat­ic sup­port­ers to join at­tempts to turn his con­firm­a­tion in­to a ref­er­en­dum on the con­tro­ver­sial plan to bring oil from Canada’s tar sands to re­finer­ies in the U.S.

Hey­man, a Chica­go in­vest­ment banker and a ma­jor fun­draiser for Pres­id­ent Obama’s two cam­paigns, was tapped last week to rep­res­ent the U.S. in Ot­t­awa. The post has been va­cant since Ju­ly, when Dav­id Jac­ob­son, the pre­vi­ous am­bas­sad­or, ended his ten­ure. Hey­man, now the man­aging dir­ect­or of private wealth man­age­ment at Gold­man Sachs, has long been rumored to be next in line for the post.

“I think the views of the Sen­ate have been very clear on [Key­stone], and I hope the pres­id­ent re­cog­nizes that,” said Sen. Mark Be­gich, D-Alaska. “But I think the am­bas­sad­or is go­ing to be a rep­res­ent­at­ive of the gov­ern­ment. Whatever the fi­nal de­cision of the State De­part­ment and the pres­id­ent, ob­vi­ously, he’ll ad­here to that. But … he doesn’t get to have a say. I mean, the am­bas­sad­or isn’t the one who’s thumbs-up or thumbs-down; it’s the pres­id­ent right now.”

Be­gich is a sup­port­er of the pipeline — cur­rently stalled in a State De­part­ment re­view — that would carry heavy crude from the Al­berta tar sands to Gulf Coast re­finer­ies.

Oth­er Demo­crat­ic Key­stone ad­voc­ates were more hes­it­ant to of­fer an opin­ion on Hey­man’s con­firm­a­tion. “I haven’t even met him; I’m not even fo­cused on it,” said Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., adding in the next breath, “Key­stone should be ap­proved.”

Sen. Mark Pry­or, D-Ark., ex­pressed hope that Hey­man “sets his views aside based on whatever U.S. policy is.” But should his po­s­i­tion on Key­stone factor in­to his Sen­ate con­firm­a­tion? “They can factor in any­thing they want in­to any nom­in­ee they want,” he said. “That’s just kind of how it works. I’ll look in­to it.”

Re­pub­lic­ans were less wary of a Key­stone-fo­cused con­firm­a­tion pro­cess. “Oh, yeah,” said Sen. James In­hofe, R-Okla., when asked if Hey­man should be ques­tioned about the pipeline. “That’s a huge en­ergy and jobs is­sue, and it’s one that should be fo­cused” on.

Don Can­ton, a spokes­man for Sen. John Ho­even, R-N.D., ad­ded that the pro­posed pipeline “is an im­port­ant is­sue between the U.S. and Canada, and that Mr. Hey­man’s view on the pipeline and the eco­nom­ic growth both coun­tries could real­ize as a res­ult of it is, of course, a crit­ic­al con­sid­er­a­tion in any con­firm­a­tion pro­cess.”

House Re­pub­lic­an lead­ers also urged their Sen­ate col­leagues to press the is­sue when Hey­man’s con­firm­a­tion comes be­fore the up­per cham­ber. “Key­stone XL is just one of many new oil and gas pipelines and trans­mis­sion lines that need to be built between our two na­tions,” said House En­ergy and Com­merce Com­mit­tee Chair­man Fred Up­ton, R-Mich. “It is im­per­at­ive that our nom­in­ee for am­bas­sad­or ap­pre­ci­ate and wel­come this op­por­tun­ity to strengthen our ties with our north­ern neigh­bor.”

Rep. Lee Terry, R-Neb., chair­man of the Com­merce, Man­u­fac­tur­ing, and Trade Sub­com­mit­tee, agrees. “As the nom­in­ee, Mr. Hey­man needs to state clearly wheth­er or not he’ll be an am­bas­sad­or who will work with our na­tion’s No. 1 trad­ing part­ner to ex­ped­ite ap­prov­al of this shovel-ready pro­ject,” said Terry spokes­man Larry Farns­worth.

What We're Following See More »
TWO MONTHS AFTER REFUSING AT CONVENTION
Cruz to Back Trump
1 days ago
THE LATEST
WHO TO BELIEVE?
Two Polls for Clinton, One for Trump
1 days ago
THE LATEST

With three days until the first debate, the polls are coming fast and furious. The latest round:

  • An Associated Press/Gfk poll of registered voters found very few voters committed, with Clin­ton lead­ing Trump, 37% to 29%, and Gary John­son at 7%.
  • A Mc­Clatchy-Mar­ist poll gave Clin­ton a six-point edge, 45% to 39%, in a four-way bal­lot test. Johnson pulls 10% support, with Jill Stein at 4%.
  • Rasmussen, which has drawn criticism for continually showing Donald Trump doing much better than he does in other polls, is at it again. A new survey gives Trump a five-point lead, 44%-39%.
NO SURPRISE
Trump Eschewing Briefing Materials in Debate Prep
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

In contrast to Hillary Clinton's meticulous debate practice sessions, Donald Trump "is largely shun­ning tra­di­tion­al de­bate pre­par­a­tions, but has been watch­ing video of…Clin­ton’s best and worst de­bate mo­ments, look­ing for her vul­ner­ab­il­it­ies.” Trump “has paid only curs­ory at­ten­tion to brief­ing ma­ter­i­als. He has re­fused to use lecterns in mock de­bate ses­sions des­pite the ur­ging of his ad­visers. He prefers spit­balling ideas with his team rather than hon­ing them in­to crisp, two-minute an­swers.”

Source:
TRUMP NO HABLA ESPANOL
Trump Makes No Outreach to Spanish Speakers
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Donald Trump "is on the precipice of becoming the only major-party presidential candidate this century not to reach out to millions of American voters whose dominant, first or just preferred language is Spanish. Trump has not only failed to buy any Spanish-language television or radio ads, he so far has avoided even offering a translation of his website into Spanish, breaking with two decades of bipartisan tradition."

Source:
$1.16 MILLION
Clintons Buy the House Next Door in Chappaqua
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Bill and Hillary Clinton have purchased the home next door to their primary residence in tony Chappaqua, New York, for $1.16 million. "By purchasing the new home, the Clinton's now own the entire cul-de-sac at the end of the road in the leafy New York suburb. The purchase makes it easier for the United States Secret Service to protect the former president and possible future commander in chief."

Source:
×