Obama’s Pick for Ambassador to Canada Likely to Be Grilled on Keystone Pipeline

National Journal
Alex Brown
Sept. 24, 2013, 5 p.m.

If Bruce Hey­man wants to be the next am­bas­sad­or to Canada, he should prob­ably start pre­par­ing to an­swer some ques­tions about the Key­stone XL pipeline. But it may be too soon to ex­pect the pro­ject’s Demo­crat­ic sup­port­ers to join at­tempts to turn his con­firm­a­tion in­to a ref­er­en­dum on the con­tro­ver­sial plan to bring oil from Canada’s tar sands to re­finer­ies in the U.S.

Hey­man, a Chica­go in­vest­ment banker and a ma­jor fun­draiser for Pres­id­ent Obama’s two cam­paigns, was tapped last week to rep­res­ent the U.S. in Ot­t­awa. The post has been va­cant since Ju­ly, when Dav­id Jac­ob­son, the pre­vi­ous am­bas­sad­or, ended his ten­ure. Hey­man, now the man­aging dir­ect­or of private wealth man­age­ment at Gold­man Sachs, has long been rumored to be next in line for the post.

“I think the views of the Sen­ate have been very clear on [Key­stone], and I hope the pres­id­ent re­cog­nizes that,” said Sen. Mark Be­gich, D-Alaska. “But I think the am­bas­sad­or is go­ing to be a rep­res­ent­at­ive of the gov­ern­ment. Whatever the fi­nal de­cision of the State De­part­ment and the pres­id­ent, ob­vi­ously, he’ll ad­here to that. But … he doesn’t get to have a say. I mean, the am­bas­sad­or isn’t the one who’s thumbs-up or thumbs-down; it’s the pres­id­ent right now.”

Be­gich is a sup­port­er of the pipeline — cur­rently stalled in a State De­part­ment re­view — that would carry heavy crude from the Al­berta tar sands to Gulf Coast re­finer­ies.

Oth­er Demo­crat­ic Key­stone ad­voc­ates were more hes­it­ant to of­fer an opin­ion on Hey­man’s con­firm­a­tion. “I haven’t even met him; I’m not even fo­cused on it,” said Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., adding in the next breath, “Key­stone should be ap­proved.”

Sen. Mark Pry­or, D-Ark., ex­pressed hope that Hey­man “sets his views aside based on whatever U.S. policy is.” But should his po­s­i­tion on Key­stone factor in­to his Sen­ate con­firm­a­tion? “They can factor in any­thing they want in­to any nom­in­ee they want,” he said. “That’s just kind of how it works. I’ll look in­to it.”

Re­pub­lic­ans were less wary of a Key­stone-fo­cused con­firm­a­tion pro­cess. “Oh, yeah,” said Sen. James In­hofe, R-Okla., when asked if Hey­man should be ques­tioned about the pipeline. “That’s a huge en­ergy and jobs is­sue, and it’s one that should be fo­cused” on.

Don Can­ton, a spokes­man for Sen. John Ho­even, R-N.D., ad­ded that the pro­posed pipeline “is an im­port­ant is­sue between the U.S. and Canada, and that Mr. Hey­man’s view on the pipeline and the eco­nom­ic growth both coun­tries could real­ize as a res­ult of it is, of course, a crit­ic­al con­sid­er­a­tion in any con­firm­a­tion pro­cess.”

House Re­pub­lic­an lead­ers also urged their Sen­ate col­leagues to press the is­sue when Hey­man’s con­firm­a­tion comes be­fore the up­per cham­ber. “Key­stone XL is just one of many new oil and gas pipelines and trans­mis­sion lines that need to be built between our two na­tions,” said House En­ergy and Com­merce Com­mit­tee Chair­man Fred Up­ton, R-Mich. “It is im­per­at­ive that our nom­in­ee for am­bas­sad­or ap­pre­ci­ate and wel­come this op­por­tun­ity to strengthen our ties with our north­ern neigh­bor.”

Rep. Lee Terry, R-Neb., chair­man of the Com­merce, Man­u­fac­tur­ing, and Trade Sub­com­mit­tee, agrees. “As the nom­in­ee, Mr. Hey­man needs to state clearly wheth­er or not he’ll be an am­bas­sad­or who will work with our na­tion’s No. 1 trad­ing part­ner to ex­ped­ite ap­prov­al of this shovel-ready pro­ject,” said Terry spokes­man Larry Farns­worth.

What We're Following See More »
AT LEAST NOT YET
Paul Ryan Can’t Get Behind Trump
8 hours ago
THE LATEST

Paul Ryan told CNN today he's "not ready" to back Donald Trump at this time. "I'm not there right now," he said. Ryan said Trump needs to unify "all wings of the Republican Party and the conservative movement" and then run a campaign that will allow Americans to "have something that they're proud to support and proud to be a part of. And we've got a ways to go from here to there."

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Preet Bharara Learned at the Foot of Chuck Schumer
9 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In The New Yorker, Jeffrey Toobin gives Preet Bharara, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, the longread treatment. The scourge of corrupt New York pols, bad actors on Wall Street, and New York gang members, Bharara learned at the foot of Chuck Schumer, the famously limelight-hogging senator whom he served as a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee staff. No surprise then, that after President Obama appointed him, Bharara "brought a media-friendly approach to what has historically been a closed and guarded institution. In professional background, Bharara resembles his predecessors; in style, he’s very different. His personality reflects his dual life in New York’s political and legal firmament. A longtime prosecutor, he sometimes acts like a budding pol; his rhetoric leans more toward the wisecrack than toward the jeremiad. He expresses himself in the orderly paragraphs of a former high-school debater, but with deft comic timing and a gift for shtick."

Source:
DRUG OFFENDERS
Obama Commutes the Sentences of 58 Prisoners
9 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama has announced another round of commutations of prison sentences. Most of the 58 individuals named are incarcerated for possessions with intent to distribute controlled substances. The prisoners will be released between later this year and 2018.

STAFF PICKS
Trump Roadmapped His Candidacy in 2000
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The Daily Beast has unearthed a piece that Donald Trump wrote for Gear magazine in 2000, which anticipates his 2016 sales pitch quite well. "Perhaps it's time for a dealmaker who can get the leaders of Congress to the table, forge consensus, and strike compromise," he writes. Oddly, he opens by defending his reputation as a womanizer: "The hypocrites argue that a man who loves and appreciates beautiful women (and does so legally and openly) shouldn't become a national leader? Is there something wrong with appreciating beautiful women? Don't we want people in public office who show signs of life?"

Source:
‘NO MORAL OR ETHICAL GROUNDING’
Sen. Murphy: Trump Shouldn’t Get Classified Briefigs
10 hours ago
THE LATEST
×