If Bruce Heyman wants to be the next ambassador to Canada, he should probably start preparing to answer some questions about the Keystone XL pipeline. But it may be too soon to expect the project’s Democratic supporters to join attempts to turn his confirmation into a referendum on the controversial plan to bring oil from Canada’s tar sands to refineries in the U.S.
Heyman, a Chicago investment banker and a major fundraiser for President Obama’s two campaigns, was tapped last week to represent the U.S. in Ottawa. The post has been vacant since July, when David Jacobson, the previous ambassador, ended his tenure. Heyman, now the managing director of private wealth management at Goldman Sachs, has long been rumored to be next in line for the post.
“I think the views of the Senate have been very clear on [Keystone], and I hope the president recognizes that,” said Sen. Mark Begich, D-Alaska. “But I think the ambassador is going to be a representative of the government. Whatever the final decision of the State Department and the president, obviously, he’ll adhere to that. But … he doesn’t get to have a say. I mean, the ambassador isn’t the one who’s thumbs-up or thumbs-down; it’s the president right now.”
Begich is a supporter of the pipeline — currently stalled in a State Department review — that would carry heavy crude from the Alberta tar sands to Gulf Coast refineries.
Other Democratic Keystone advocates were more hesitant to offer an opinion on Heyman’s confirmation. “I haven’t even met him; I’m not even focused on it,” said Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., adding in the next breath, “Keystone should be approved.”
Sen. Mark Pryor, D-Ark., expressed hope that Heyman “sets his views aside based on whatever U.S. policy is.” But should his position on Keystone factor into his Senate confirmation? “They can factor in anything they want into any nominee they want,” he said. “That’s just kind of how it works. I’ll look into it.”
Republicans were less wary of a Keystone-focused confirmation process. “Oh, yeah,” said Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., when asked if Heyman should be questioned about the pipeline. “That’s a huge energy and jobs issue, and it’s one that should be focused” on.
Don Canton, a spokesman for Sen. John Hoeven, R-N.D., added that the proposed pipeline “is an important issue between the U.S. and Canada, and that Mr. Heyman’s view on the pipeline and the economic growth both countries could realize as a result of it is, of course, a critical consideration in any confirmation process.”
House Republican leaders also urged their Senate colleagues to press the issue when Heyman’s confirmation comes before the upper chamber. “Keystone XL is just one of many new oil and gas pipelines and transmission lines that need to be built between our two nations,” said House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton, R-Mich. “It is imperative that our nominee for ambassador appreciate and welcome this opportunity to strengthen our ties with our northern neighbor.”
Rep. Lee Terry, R-Neb., chairman of the Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade Subcommittee, agrees. “As the nominee, Mr. Heyman needs to state clearly whether or not he’ll be an ambassador who will work with our nation’s No. 1 trading partner to expedite approval of this shovel-ready project,” said Terry spokesman Larry Farnsworth.
What We're Following See More »
"It is with humility, determination, and boundless confidence in America’s promise that I accept your nomination for president," said Hillary Clinton in becoming the first woman to accept a nomination for president from a major party. Clinton gave a wide-ranging address, both criticizing Donald Trump and speaking of what she has done in the past and hopes to do in the future. "He's taken the Republican party a long way, from morning in America to midnight in America," Clinton said of Trump. However, most of her speech focused instead on the work she has done and the work she hopes to do as president. "I will be a president of Democrats, Republicans, and Independents. For the struggling, the striving, the successful," she said. "For those who vote for me and for those who don't. For all Americans together."
Supporters of Bernie Sanders promised to walk out, turn their backs, or disrupt Hillary Clinton's speech tonight, and they made good immediately, with an outburst almost as soon as Clinton began her speech. But her supporters, armed with a handy counter-chant cheat sheet distributed by the campaign, immediately began drowning them out with chants of "Hillary, Hillary!"
If a new poll is to be believed, Hillary Clinton has a big lead in the all-important swing state of Pennsylvania. A new Suffolk University survey shows her ahead of Donald Trump, 50%-41%. In a four-way race, she maintains her nine-point lead, 46%-37%. "Pennsylvania has voted Democratic in the past six presidential elections, going back to Bill Clinton’s first win in 1992. Yet it is a rust belt state that could be in play, as indicated by recent general-election polling showing a close race."
Wednesday was the third night in a row that the Democratic convention enjoyed a ratings win over the Republican convention last week. Which might have prompted a fundraising email from Donald Trump exhorting supporters not to watch. "Unless you want to be lied to, belittled, and attacked for your beliefs, don't watch Hillary's DNC speech tonight," the email read. "Instead, help Donald Trump hold her accountable, call out her lies and fight back against her nasty attacks."
Catholics who attend mass at least weekly have increased their support of the Democratic nominee by 22 points, relative to 2012, when devout Catholics backed Mitt Romney. Meanwhile, a Morning Consult poll shows that those voters with advanced degrees prefer Hillary Clinton, 51%-34%. Which, we suppose, makes the ideal Clinton voter a Catholic with a PhD in divinity.