Americans Sharply Divided Over Repealing Obamacare

United Technologies/National Journal Congressional Connection Poll finds division along partisan, gender, income, education lines.

Dueling protests have been a regular Washington feature throughout the Obamacare debate.
National Journal
Shane Goldmacher
Sept. 25, 2013, 5 p.m.

With en­roll­ment in Obama­care health ex­changes set to open in less than a week, Amer­ic­an opin­ion on the law re­mains hardened, with a nar­row plur­al­ity pre­fer­ring to keep the health care law rather than re­peal it.

In the latest United Tech­no­lo­gies/Na­tion­al Journ­al Con­gres­sion­al Con­nec­tion Poll, 49 per­cent of Amer­ic­ans said Con­gress should keep the pro­gram be­cause of the ex­pan­ded in­sur­ance cov­er­age it provides, while 44 per­cent said it should be re­pealed be­cause it is too costly.

The find­ings come as Con­gress de­bates an ef­fort by con­ser­vat­ive law­makers and tea-party groups to de­fund the law or shut down the gov­ern­ment on Oct. 1.

The par­tis­an di­vide over the health care law is stark. More than three in four Re­pub­lic­ans, 77 per­cent, said the pro­gram should be re­pealed. Mean­while, 72 per­cent of Demo­crats said it should re­main in place. In­de­pend­ents are closely di­vided: 46 per­cent fa­vor re­peal and 45 per­cent op­pose.

Broadly, the sur­vey res­ults mir­ror past United Tech­no­lo­gies/Na­tion­al Journ­al Con­gres­sion­al Con­nec­tion Polls in Ju­ly and March, each of which found keep­ing the law favored by a nar­row plur­al­ity. Di­vi­sions over the law are not just by party but by gender, race, in­come, and level of edu­ca­tion.

A ma­jor­ity of men, 51 per­cent, are in fa­vor of re­peal. But 55 per­cent of wo­men say the law should re­main in place. A nar­row ma­jor­ity of whites, 51 per­cent, fa­vor re­peal while 62 per­cent of non­whites would rather the law stay in place.

White men, par­tic­u­larly those without a col­lege de­gree, are the staunchest op­pon­ents of Obama­care. More than three in five of them, 61 per­cent, say it should be re­pealed. Con­trast that with col­lege-edu­cated white wo­men, 56 per­cent of whom be­lieve the pro­gram should stay.

Those with col­lege de­grees are the staunchest sup­port­ers of the law, with 56 per­cent in fa­vor of it. Among those with a high school edu­ca­tion or less, only 46 per­cent back it—a 10-point gap.

Those mak­ing less than $50,000 per year want to keep the law by 13 points, 53 per­cent to 40 per­cent. But a plur­al­ity of those mak­ing more than $50,000 would rather see it re­pealed, 49 per­cent to 45 per­cent. Not­ably, the law was writ­ten chiefly to help poorer Amer­ic­ans.

The poll, con­duc­ted Sept. 19-22, in­ter­viewed 1,003 adults over land­line and cell phones. It has a mar­gin of er­ror of plus or minus 3.6 per­cent­age points.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4469) }}

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
10 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
11 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×