A few hours before slamming into the East Coast, flooding basements, splintering boardwalks, and destroying whole communities, Hurricane Sandy did something that crucially changed the national response to the storm — it stopped being a hurricane.
It didn’t matter that Sandy was a gigantic (expletive) storm. It had combined into something more like a nor’easter. Technically, it was a post-tropical cyclone, a name that surely has less connotative meaning than “hurricane.”
And then the bureaucracy got in the way. Yes, it appears not even the weather is free of red tape. Below, see how the hurricane-warning model looked when Sandy came ashore. When the storm became “post-tropical” (and therefore not technically a hurricane) as it approached land, it dropped out of the National Hurricane Center’s purview.(NOAA)
Warnings about the storm didn’t drop altogether. They did, however, change hands to another branch of the weather bureaucracy: local National Weather Service offices. “That choice meant that local meteorological offices, without the NHC’s hurricane expertise, determined what local warnings to issue,” an article in the September issue of Earth magazine, published by the American Geosciences Institute, explains. “It meant that local government officials had to determine their own evacuation orders from the local meteorologists.”
The Earth piece is an interesting and at times frustrating outline of the chaos of what happens when nature intersects with rigid government protocols. Before the storm struck, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (the weather service’s parent agency) was worried that if the electronic systems had sent out a hurricane warning but called it a “post-tropical storm,” the systems could have failed, they were that rigid. James L. Franklin, the chief of the Hurricane Specialist Unit at the National Hurricane Center, told Earth “it might have worked, but we had no way to test it…. We are obligated to follow the rules that we told [weather reporters, local governments, and emergency responders] we will follow.”
Earth explains what happened next:
In the end, NHC stuck with the NOAA protocol and went with the suite of warnings prescribed for nontropical storms, consistent with the NHC’s forecasts. But that choice meant that local meteorological offices, without the NHC’s hurricane expertise, determined what local warnings to issue; it meant that local government officials had to determine their own evacuation orders from the local meteorologists. There was no unified message, such as would have come from NHC if the team had retained control in a hurricane scenario. Every warning would have come from NHC, labeled as a hurricane from start to finish, had Sandy hit land as a hurricane.
So what the change of storm class did was change the message, and perhaps watered it down in the process. “NWS was concerned that if it issued hurricane watches and warnings and then dropped them before the storm struck land (and after the storm transitioned to post-tropical), there would be significant confusion on the part of decision makers and the public,” the official NOAA assessment of the storm reads.
Those in the weather media were irked. Bryan Norcoss at The Weather Channel told Earth, “The public messages were very garbled on the level of threat.” And this trickled down to the public’s understanding of the storm. A University of Pennsylvania assessment found that:
While there was universal awareness of the threat that Sandy posed and almost all took some preparatory action, there was also widespread confusion about the nature of warnings issued about Sandy, and preparation that was insufficient for the threat Sandy posed. For example, as short as six hours before landfall and after tropical-storm-force winds had been affecting the coast for a number of hours, 40 percent of respondents mistakenly believed they were under a hurricane watch (instead of a hurricane-force wind warning). Likewise, most coastal residents misconstrued the primary threat of Sandy as coming from wind rather than water.
And it was the storm surge that caused the worst of the damage. The episode, however, did spur NOAA to change its warning protocols. Now, if a hurricane gets downgraded and it’s still a massive storm set to do damage, we’re still going to treat it like a hurricane. This is what the new model looks like.(NOAA)
What We're Following See More »
Evan McMullin, the independent conservative candidate who may win his home state of Utah, is quietly planning to turn his candidacy into a broader movement for principled conservatism. He tells BuzzFeed he's "skeptical" that the Republican party can reform itself "within a generation" and that the party's internal "disease" can't be cured via "the existing infrastructure.” The ex-CIA employee and Capitol Hill staffer says, “I have seen and worked with a lot of very courageous people in my time [but] I have seen a remarkable display of cowardice over the last couple of months in our leaders.” McMullin's team has assembled organizations in the 11 states where he's on the ballot, and adviser Rick Wilson says "there’s actually a very vibrant market for our message in the urban northeast and in parts of the south."
One of the main reasons for the recent Obamacare premium hikes is that many potential enrollees have simply decided to pay the tax penalty for remaining uninsured, rather than pay for insurance. More than 8 million people paid the penalty in 2014, and preliminary numbers for 2015 suggest that the number approaches 6 million. "For the young and healthy who are badly needed to make the exchanges work, it is sometimes cheaper to pay the Internal Revenue Service than an insurance company charging large premiums, with huge deductibles."
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) said that "there was “precedent” for a Supreme Court with fewer than nine justices—appearing to suggest that the blockade on nominee Merrick Garland could last past the election." Speaking to reporters in Colorado, Cruz said: "I would note, just recently, that Justice Breyer observed that the vacancy is not impacting the ability of the court to do its job. That’s a debate that we are going to have.”