United Nations Near Agreement with Chemical Agency on Syria Cooperation

A Syrian man walks among rubble of destroyed residential buildings minutes after an airstrike hit Habit village, in the Syrian central province of Hama, Sep. 25, 2013.
National Journal
Elaine M. Grossman, Global Security Newswire
See more stories about...
Elaine M. Grossman, Global Security Newswire
Sept. 26, 2013, 9:02 a.m.

LON­DON — The United Na­tions and a Neth­er­lands-based in­ter­na­tion­al or­gan­iz­a­tion re­spons­ible for im­ple­ment­ing the Chem­ic­al Weapons Con­ven­tion are close to agree­ing on how to de­lin­eate their roles in in­spect­ing and ul­ti­mately elim­in­at­ing Syr­ia’s newly de­clared chem­ic­al arms, ac­cord­ing to key of­fi­cials.

The Or­gan­iz­a­tion for the Pro­hib­i­tion of Chem­ic­al Weapons has been at log­ger­heads with the United Na­tions over the past week or more re­gard­ing which body would ef­fect­ively take more of a lead­ing role in Syr­ia, sources tell Glob­al Se­cur­ity News­wire.

Un­der a sup­ple­ment­ary agree­ment between the two in­ter­na­tion­al en­tit­ies — pos­sibly to be con­cluded be­fore the end of this week — in­spect­ors would be hired and dis­patched to Syr­ia un­der the OP­CW ae­gis, to veri­fy de­clared chem­ic­al stocks and pre­pare for their elim­in­a­tion.

Lo­gist­ics and se­cur­ity for the team likely would be provided by the United Na­tions, ac­cord­ing to U.N. of­fi­cials and out­side ex­perts.

The United Na­tions has a ba­sic op­er­at­ing pact with the chem­ic­al-treaty or­gan­iz­a­tion and already main­tains some field teams on the ground in Syr­ia, mak­ing col­lab­or­a­tion on the in­spec­tions and lock-down of the Mideast na­tion’s ar­sen­al al­most in­ev­it­able.

However, since the United States and Rus­sia struck their ground­break­ing Sept. 14 ac­cord in re­ac­tion to use of chem­ic­al weapons in Syr­ia, many es­sen­tial de­tails of how the pact would be im­ple­men­ted have yet to be de­term­ined.

“We are look­ing in­to what role we could pos­sibly play,” one U.N. of­fi­cial said in a Wed­nes­day tele­phone in­ter­view.

In line with the U.S.-Rus­sia deal, Syr­ia has just joined the chem­ic­al treaty — which bans the pro­duc­tion, stock­pil­ing or use of the deadly arms — and has is­sued to OP­CW of­fi­cials a con­fid­en­tial de­clar­a­tion on the size and loc­a­tions of its chem­ic­al ar­sen­al.

The de­vel­op­ment fol­lowed the Syr­i­an mil­it­ary’s al­leged use of sar­in gas against its ci­vil­ian pop­u­la­tion on Aug. 21, which Wash­ing­ton and its al­lies say claimed the lives of more than 1,400 people just out­side of cap­it­al city Dam­as­cus.

An in­ter­na­tion­al task force re­turned to Syr­ia on Wed­nes­day to con­tin­ue its in­vest­ig­a­tion in­to sus­pec­ted in­stances of chem­ic­al use in the na­tion’s two-year-old civil war.

The chem­ic­al weapons or­gan­iz­a­tion in the Hag­ue has not yet of­fi­cially shared key de­tails about Syr­ia’s chem­ic­al stocks de­clar­a­tion with the United Na­tions in New York — and it was un­clear on Thursday how much would be re­vealed to the in­ter­na­tion­al body or along what time lines.

OP­CW of­fi­cials are ob­lig­ated to safe­guard chem­ic­al-stock­pile in­form­a­tion provided by mem­ber na­tions.

Se­cur­ity con­sid­er­a­tions could im­pede the wide dis­tri­bu­tion of sens­it­ive in­form­a­tion about the dis­tri­bu­tion and size of Syr­ia’s chem­ic­al ar­sen­al, ac­cord­ing to is­sue ex­perts.

“Con­fid­en­ti­al­ity is an im­port­ant [factor]” in en­sur­ing that chem­ic­al stocks are not put at a high­er se­cur­ity risk fol­low­ing a CWC states-party de­clar­a­tion of the kind made by Syr­ia, said Yasemin Balci, a leg­al of­ficer based here with VER­TIC, an in­de­pend­ent non-profit or­gan­iz­a­tion spe­cial­iz­ing in veri­fy­ing in­ter­na­tion­al treat­ies. “That’s a very tricky situ­ation.”

However, the treaty or­gan­iz­a­tion will share data for the pur­poses of states parties be­ing “as­sured of the con­tin­ued com­pli­ance with the con­ven­tion by oth­er states parties,” ac­cord­ing to the Chem­ic­al Weapons Con­ven­tion.

The ex­pec­ted sup­ple­ment­ary pact between the two en­tit­ies also would likely sort out how op­er­a­tions are to be fun­ded, of­fi­cials said.

An up­com­ing res­ol­u­tion by the U.N. Se­cur­ity Coun­cil — still un­der ne­go­ti­ation prin­cip­ally by the United States and Rus­sia — and a de­cision by the OP­CW Ex­ec­ut­ive Coun­cil are to form­al­ize up­com­ing ac­tion on the Syr­i­an stock­pile.

Wash­ing­ton and Mo­scow have not yet agreed on how im­ple­ment­a­tion would be en­forced if Pres­id­ent Bashar As­sad’s gov­ern­ment balks, or if U.N. or OP­CW in­spec­tions per­son­nel are put at risk.

In­spect­ors in Syr­ia look­ing in­to the al­leged Ghouta at­tack were tar­geted by sniper fire in late Au­gust, though there were no re­por­ted in­jur­ies.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
19 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
20 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
21 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×