LONDON — The United Nations and a Netherlands-based international organization responsible for implementing the Chemical Weapons Convention are close to agreeing on how to delineate their roles in inspecting and ultimately eliminating Syria’s newly declared chemical arms, according to key officials.
The Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons has been at loggerheads with the United Nations over the past week or more regarding which body would effectively take more of a leading role in Syria, sources tell Global Security Newswire.
Under a supplementary agreement between the two international entities — possibly to be concluded before the end of this week — inspectors would be hired and dispatched to Syria under the OPCW aegis, to verify declared chemical stocks and prepare for their elimination.
Logistics and security for the team likely would be provided by the United Nations, according to U.N. officials and outside experts.
The United Nations has a basic operating pact with the chemical-treaty organization and already maintains some field teams on the ground in Syria, making collaboration on the inspections and lock-down of the Mideast nation’s arsenal almost inevitable.
However, since the United States and Russia struck their groundbreaking Sept. 14 accord in reaction to use of chemical weapons in Syria, many essential details of how the pact would be implemented have yet to be determined.
“We are looking into what role we could possibly play,” one U.N. official said in a Wednesday telephone interview.
In line with the U.S.-Russia deal, Syria has just joined the chemical treaty — which bans the production, stockpiling or use of the deadly arms — and has issued to OPCW officials a confidential declaration on the size and locations of its chemical arsenal.
The development followed the Syrian military’s alleged use of sarin gas against its civilian population on Aug. 21, which Washington and its allies say claimed the lives of more than 1,400 people just outside of capital city Damascus.
An international task force returned to Syria on Wednesday to continue its investigation into suspected instances of chemical use in the nation’s two-year-old civil war.
The chemical weapons organization in the Hague has not yet officially shared key details about Syria’s chemical stocks declaration with the United Nations in New York — and it was unclear on Thursday how much would be revealed to the international body or along what time lines.
OPCW officials are obligated to safeguard chemical-stockpile information provided by member nations.
Security considerations could impede the wide distribution of sensitive information about the distribution and size of Syria’s chemical arsenal, according to issue experts.
“Confidentiality is an important [factor]” in ensuring that chemical stocks are not put at a higher security risk following a CWC states-party declaration of the kind made by Syria, said Yasemin Balci, a legal officer based here with VERTIC, an independent non-profit organization specializing in verifying international treaties. “That’s a very tricky situation.”
However, the treaty organization will share data for the purposes of states parties being “assured of the continued compliance with the convention by other states parties,” according to the Chemical Weapons Convention.
The expected supplementary pact between the two entities also would likely sort out how operations are to be funded, officials said.
An upcoming resolution by the U.N. Security Council — still under negotiation principally by the United States and Russia — and a decision by the OPCW Executive Council are to formalize upcoming action on the Syrian stockpile.
Washington and Moscow have not yet agreed on how implementation would be enforced if President Bashar Assad’s government balks, or if U.N. or OPCW inspections personnel are put at risk.
Inspectors in Syria looking into the alleged Ghouta attack were targeted by sniper fire in late August, though there were no reported injuries.
What We're Following See More »
"It is with humility, determination, and boundless confidence in America’s promise that I accept your nomination for president," said Hillary Clinton in becoming the first woman to accept a nomination for president from a major party. Clinton gave a wide-ranging address, both criticizing Donald Trump and speaking of what she has done in the past and hopes to do in the future. "He's taken the Republican party a long way, from morning in America to midnight in America," Clinton said of Trump. However, most of her speech focused instead on the work she has done and the work she hopes to do as president. "I will be a president of Democrats, Republicans, and Independents. For the struggling, the striving, the successful," she said. "For those who vote for me and for those who don't. For all Americans together."
Supporters of Bernie Sanders promised to walk out, turn their backs, or disrupt Hillary Clinton's speech tonight, and they made good immediately, with an outburst almost as soon as Clinton began her speech. But her supporters, armed with a handy counter-chant cheat sheet distributed by the campaign, immediately began drowning them out with chants of "Hillary, Hillary!"
If a new poll is to be believed, Hillary Clinton has a big lead in the all-important swing state of Pennsylvania. A new Suffolk University survey shows her ahead of Donald Trump, 50%-41%. In a four-way race, she maintains her nine-point lead, 46%-37%. "Pennsylvania has voted Democratic in the past six presidential elections, going back to Bill Clinton’s first win in 1992. Yet it is a rust belt state that could be in play, as indicated by recent general-election polling showing a close race."
Wednesday was the third night in a row that the Democratic convention enjoyed a ratings win over the Republican convention last week. Which might have prompted a fundraising email from Donald Trump exhorting supporters not to watch. "Unless you want to be lied to, belittled, and attacked for your beliefs, don't watch Hillary's DNC speech tonight," the email read. "Instead, help Donald Trump hold her accountable, call out her lies and fight back against her nasty attacks."
Catholics who attend mass at least weekly have increased their support of the Democratic nominee by 22 points, relative to 2012, when devout Catholics backed Mitt Romney. Meanwhile, a Morning Consult poll shows that those voters with advanced degrees prefer Hillary Clinton, 51%-34%. Which, we suppose, makes the ideal Clinton voter a Catholic with a PhD in divinity.