United Nations Near Agreement with Chemical Agency on Syria Cooperation

A Syrian man walks among rubble of destroyed residential buildings minutes after an airstrike hit Habit village, in the Syrian central province of Hama, Sep. 25, 2013.
National Journal
Elaine M. Grossman, Global Security Newswire
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Elaine M. Grossman, Global Security Newswire
Sept. 26, 2013, 9:02 a.m.

LON­DON — The United Na­tions and a Neth­er­lands-based in­ter­na­tion­al or­gan­iz­a­tion re­spons­ible for im­ple­ment­ing the Chem­ic­al Weapons Con­ven­tion are close to agree­ing on how to de­lin­eate their roles in in­spect­ing and ul­ti­mately elim­in­at­ing Syr­ia’s newly de­clared chem­ic­al arms, ac­cord­ing to key of­fi­cials.

The Or­gan­iz­a­tion for the Pro­hib­i­tion of Chem­ic­al Weapons has been at log­ger­heads with the United Na­tions over the past week or more re­gard­ing which body would ef­fect­ively take more of a lead­ing role in Syr­ia, sources tell Glob­al Se­cur­ity News­wire.

Un­der a sup­ple­ment­ary agree­ment between the two in­ter­na­tion­al en­tit­ies — pos­sibly to be con­cluded be­fore the end of this week — in­spect­ors would be hired and dis­patched to Syr­ia un­der the OP­CW ae­gis, to veri­fy de­clared chem­ic­al stocks and pre­pare for their elim­in­a­tion.

Lo­gist­ics and se­cur­ity for the team likely would be provided by the United Na­tions, ac­cord­ing to U.N. of­fi­cials and out­side ex­perts.

The United Na­tions has a ba­sic op­er­at­ing pact with the chem­ic­al-treaty or­gan­iz­a­tion and already main­tains some field teams on the ground in Syr­ia, mak­ing col­lab­or­a­tion on the in­spec­tions and lock-down of the Mideast na­tion’s ar­sen­al al­most in­ev­it­able.

However, since the United States and Rus­sia struck their ground­break­ing Sept. 14 ac­cord in re­ac­tion to use of chem­ic­al weapons in Syr­ia, many es­sen­tial de­tails of how the pact would be im­ple­men­ted have yet to be de­term­ined.

“We are look­ing in­to what role we could pos­sibly play,” one U.N. of­fi­cial said in a Wed­nes­day tele­phone in­ter­view.

In line with the U.S.-Rus­sia deal, Syr­ia has just joined the chem­ic­al treaty — which bans the pro­duc­tion, stock­pil­ing or use of the deadly arms — and has is­sued to OP­CW of­fi­cials a con­fid­en­tial de­clar­a­tion on the size and loc­a­tions of its chem­ic­al ar­sen­al.

The de­vel­op­ment fol­lowed the Syr­i­an mil­it­ary’s al­leged use of sar­in gas against its ci­vil­ian pop­u­la­tion on Aug. 21, which Wash­ing­ton and its al­lies say claimed the lives of more than 1,400 people just out­side of cap­it­al city Dam­as­cus.

An in­ter­na­tion­al task force re­turned to Syr­ia on Wed­nes­day to con­tin­ue its in­vest­ig­a­tion in­to sus­pec­ted in­stances of chem­ic­al use in the na­tion’s two-year-old civil war.

The chem­ic­al weapons or­gan­iz­a­tion in the Hag­ue has not yet of­fi­cially shared key de­tails about Syr­ia’s chem­ic­al stocks de­clar­a­tion with the United Na­tions in New York — and it was un­clear on Thursday how much would be re­vealed to the in­ter­na­tion­al body or along what time lines.

OP­CW of­fi­cials are ob­lig­ated to safe­guard chem­ic­al-stock­pile in­form­a­tion provided by mem­ber na­tions.

Se­cur­ity con­sid­er­a­tions could im­pede the wide dis­tri­bu­tion of sens­it­ive in­form­a­tion about the dis­tri­bu­tion and size of Syr­ia’s chem­ic­al ar­sen­al, ac­cord­ing to is­sue ex­perts.

“Con­fid­en­ti­al­ity is an im­port­ant [factor]” in en­sur­ing that chem­ic­al stocks are not put at a high­er se­cur­ity risk fol­low­ing a CWC states-party de­clar­a­tion of the kind made by Syr­ia, said Yasemin Balci, a leg­al of­ficer based here with VER­TIC, an in­de­pend­ent non-profit or­gan­iz­a­tion spe­cial­iz­ing in veri­fy­ing in­ter­na­tion­al treat­ies. “That’s a very tricky situ­ation.”

However, the treaty or­gan­iz­a­tion will share data for the pur­poses of states parties be­ing “as­sured of the con­tin­ued com­pli­ance with the con­ven­tion by oth­er states parties,” ac­cord­ing to the Chem­ic­al Weapons Con­ven­tion.

The ex­pec­ted sup­ple­ment­ary pact between the two en­tit­ies also would likely sort out how op­er­a­tions are to be fun­ded, of­fi­cials said.

An up­com­ing res­ol­u­tion by the U.N. Se­cur­ity Coun­cil — still un­der ne­go­ti­ation prin­cip­ally by the United States and Rus­sia — and a de­cision by the OP­CW Ex­ec­ut­ive Coun­cil are to form­al­ize up­com­ing ac­tion on the Syr­i­an stock­pile.

Wash­ing­ton and Mo­scow have not yet agreed on how im­ple­ment­a­tion would be en­forced if Pres­id­ent Bashar As­sad’s gov­ern­ment balks, or if U.N. or OP­CW in­spec­tions per­son­nel are put at risk.

In­spect­ors in Syr­ia look­ing in­to the al­leged Ghouta at­tack were tar­geted by sniper fire in late Au­gust, though there were no re­por­ted in­jur­ies.

What We're Following See More »
LIKELY PAVES WAY FOR BUDGET CR
No ACA Vote This Week
5 minutes ago
THE LATEST

"Despite pressure from the White House, House GOP leaders determined Thursday night that they didn’t have the votes to pass a rewrite of the Affordable Care Act and would not seek to put their proposal on the floor on Friday. A late push to act on health care had threatened the bipartisan deal to keep the government open for one week while lawmakers crafted a longer-term spending deal. Now, members are likely to approve the short-term spending bill when it comes to the floor and keep the government open past midnight on Friday."

Source:
PRESIDENT CALLS MEDICAID FUNDS A “BAILOUT”
Puerto Rico Another Sticking Point in Budget Talks
14 hours ago
THE DETAILS

President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."

Source:
POTENTIAL GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN?
Democrats Threaten Spending Bill Over Obamacare
19 hours ago
BREAKING

Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.

Source:
IN 2014
Pentagon Warned Flynn Not To Accept Foreign Payments
21 hours ago
BREAKING
WOULD PUSH DEADLINE TO MAY 5
One-Week Spending Bill On The Table
21 hours ago
BREAKING

Members of Congress are eyeing a one-week spending bill which would keep the government open past the Friday night deadline, giving lawmakers an extra week to iron out a long-term deal to fund the government. Without any action, the government would run out of funding starting at midnight Saturday. “I am optimistic that a final funding package will be completed soon," said Rep. Rodney Frelinghuysen, R-N.J., chairman of the House Appropriations Committee.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login