With Shutdown Looming, House GOP Split over Obamacare Strategy

House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio, left, and House Majority Leader Eric Cantor of Va., right, walk to a Republican caucus on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Sept. 26, 2013.
National Journal
Tim Alberta
Add to Briefcase
Tim Alberta
Sept. 26, 2013, 11:58 a.m.

House Re­pub­lic­ans are di­vided over wheth­er to pur­sue a debt-ceil­ing vote be­fore or after act­ing on the Sen­ate’s re­vised con­tinu­ing res­ol­u­tion, a tac­tic­al di­lemma that has law­makers fly­ing blind in­to a crit­ic­al week­end of work that will either avert — or ush­er in — a gov­ern­ment shut­down.

Sev­er­al hours after a House GOP meet­ing in which Speak­er John Boehner de­tailed his debt-ceil­ing pro­pos­al — which fea­tures a one-year delay of Obama­care im­ple­ment­a­tion — con­ser­vat­ive mem­bers gathered in the same meet­ing space, in the Cap­it­ol base­ment, for the weekly meet­ing of the Re­pub­lic­an Study Com­mit­tee. Law­makers emer­ging from that meet­ing de­scribed the dia­logue as tense, with sev­er­al mem­bers protest­ing the idea of pro­ceed­ing with a vote on Boehner’s debt-ceil­ing pack­age be­fore know­ing what comes next in the CR ne­go­ti­ations.

Ac­cord­ing to sources in the room, Rep. Raul Lab­rador of Idaho was among the mem­bers baffled at the idea of ex­ped­it­ing a debt-ceil­ing vote. At one point Lab­rador singled out Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Eric Can­tor, who was in at­tend­ance, and asked point-blank: “Why the heck would we vote on the debt-ceil­ing be­fore the Sen­ate sends us their CR?”

Can­tor replied: “No de­cisions have been made.”

This ex­change high­lights the grow­ing angst among Re­pub­lic­ans as the cam­paign to di­min­ish Obama­care reaches its most crit­ic­al stage. Some con­ser­vat­ives are vehe­mently op­posed to the idea of push­ing any debt-ceil­ing deal be­fore they first ex­ecute a re­turn vol­ley on the CR. Since the House ini­tially passed a ‘de­fund Obama­care’ meas­ure, they ar­gue, why should it sud­denly pass a ‘delay Obama­care’ pro­vi­sion be­fore ever re­ceiv­ing a re­sponse to its open­ing tender?

“It’s not how you ne­go­ti­ate,” said Rep. Louie Gohmert of Texas.

Can­tor wasn’t at­tempt­ing to mol­li­fy his right flank, however; sources say the lead­er­ship team truly has not de­cided on how to pro­ceed. Ma­jor­ity Whip Kev­in Mc­Carthy’s team began tal­ly­ing debt-ceil­ing votes soon after Thursday’s meet­ing, but that ef­fort was com­plic­ated by some mem­bers re­fus­ing to com­mit on the debt-ceil­ing plan un­til in­formed of the pre­cise se­quence of votes. Of course, that se­quence can’t be de­cided un­til lead­er­ship knows where mem­bers stand — which is what Mc­Carthy’s team is now strug­gling to de­term­ine.

Fur­ther com­plic­at­ing these tac­tic­al de­lib­er­a­tions is swell­ing un­cer­tainty over when, ex­actly, the Sen­ate will send the House its re­vised CR. Re­pub­lic­ans in the House ex­pressed an ar­ray of ex­pect­a­tions on Thursday — some whispered about Fri­day morn­ing, oth­ers pre­dicted Sunday night — but this swirl­ing spec­u­la­tion only un­der­scored the vis­cer­al ap­pre­hen­sion head­ing in­to the week­end.

“We’re hear­ing a hun­dred dif­fer­ent things,” Rep. Kev­in Brady, R-Texas, said of the Sen­ate’s CR time­frame.

Re­gard­less of tim­ing, many mem­bers voiced frus­tra­tion in the RSC meet­ing over the debt-ceil­ing pro­pos­al it­self. Spe­cific­ally, con­ser­vat­ives were baffled that Boehner spelled out the pro­vi­sions of the bill without present­ing a “score” that de­tails a pre­cise sum of spend­ing cuts and sav­ings. Sev­er­al law­makers, in fact, said they would not vote for the pro­pos­al — re­gard­less of tim­ing — un­til they see the bill scored.

(The le­gis­la­tion, which has yet to be form­ally in­tro­duced, meas­ured eco­nom­ic growth but did not tab­u­late ex­act sav­ings.)

Adding to this mount­ing mal­aise amid an ac­tion-packed day at the Cap­it­ol was an eye­brow-rais­ing sen­ti­ment, ex­pressed by some GOP aides, that the latest set­back for Obama­care — a re­por­ted delay in on­line en­roll­ment for cer­tain health care ex­changes — could ac­tu­ally in­centiv­ize a brief shut­down in the eyes of some mem­bers.

If Tues­day ar­rives without a budget deal, some con­ser­vat­ives spec­u­late, me­dia cov­er­age of the gov­ern­ment shut­down will co­in­cide with a “dis­astrous” rol­lout of the Obama­care ex­changes. At that point, these mem­bers be­lieve, their cam­paign to de­feat Obama­care would sud­denly be jus­ti­fied in the eyes of the pub­lic and the flaws of the health care law would be ex­posed — even at the ex­pense of a brief, cho­reo­graphed shut­down.

Of course, the vast ma­jor­ity of Re­pub­lic­ans are de­term­ined to avoid a shut­down. But a small fac­tion of con­ser­vat­ives have long down­played the po­ten­tial dam­age to the GOP brand.

“The gov­ern­ment shuts down every week­end. They shut down every hol­i­day,” Rep. Tim Huel­skamp of Kan­sas told Na­tion­al Journ­al re­cently. “So a couple of days of shut­down…”

What We're Following See More »
BIGGEST SHAKEUP OF ALL?
Bannon Is Out at the White House
1 hours ago
THE LATEST

First, it was Sean Spicer. Then Reince Priebus. Now, presidential adviser Steve Bannon, perhaps the administration's biggest lightning rod for criticism, is out. “White House Chief of Staff John Kelly and Steve Bannon have mutually agreed today would be Steve’s last day,” the White House press secretary, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, said in a statement. “We are grateful for his service and wish him the best.” That's not to say the parting of ways isn't controversial. Bannon says he submitted his resignation on Aug. 7, but earlier today, "the president had told senior aides that he had decided to remove Mr. Bannon."

Source:
INITIATIVE TARGETED GUN RETAILERS, OTHERS
Trump Ends Obama’s “Operation Choke Point”
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The Trump administration has ended Operation Choke Point, the anti-fraud initiative started under the Obama administration that many Republicans argued was used to target gun retailers and other businesses that Democrats found objectionable. Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd told GOP representatives in a Wednesday letter that the long-running program had ended, bringing a conclusion to a chapter in the Obama years that long provoked and angered conservatives who saw Choke Point as an extra-legal crackdown on politically disfavored groups."

Source:
LIBERALS RAISE CONFLICT OF ISSUE QUESTIONS
Gorsuch to Deliver Speech at Trump Hotel
4 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Liberal groups are raising questions about a speaking appearance Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch plans to make next month at the Trump International Hotel in Washington. Gorsuch is scheduled to headline a luncheon celebrating the 50th anniversary of conservative group The Fund for American Studies on September 28, days before the next SCOTUS term begins October 2. Steve Slattery, a spokesman for The Fund for American Studies, said Gorsuch had nothing to do with venue choice, which was made long before the group asked Gorsuch to speak."

Source:
CYBER COMMAND ELEVATED AT DOD
Administration Faces Exodus of Top Cybersecurity Officials
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The Trump administration has lost a handful of individuals serving in top cybersecurity roles across the federal government in recent weeks, even as it has struggled to fill high-ranking IT positions. The developments present hurdles for the new administration and speak to the longstanding challenge the federal government faces in competing with the private sector for top tech talent." Among those resigning is Richard Staropoli, "a former U.S. Secret Service agent who served as chief information officer (CIO) of the Department of Homeland Security for just three months," and Dave DeVries, the CIO at OPM. Separately, the White House announced today that President Trump has directed that United States Cyber Command be elevated to the status of a Unified Combatant Command focused on cyberspace operations.

Source:
SAYS TRUMP JUST ATTACKING REPUBLICANS
Former Top Aide to McConnell Says GOPers Should Abandon Trump
1 days ago
THE LATEST
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login