The Senate GOP Divide on Display

Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., leaves the Senate on Capitol Hill in Washington, Friday, March 22, 2013, after several votes on amendments to the budget resolution.
National Journal
Michael Catalin
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Michael Catalin
Sept. 26, 2013, 2:06 p.m.

The nor­mally sleepy Sen­ate cham­ber crackled with drama on Thursday.

Sen. Bob Cork­er got so frus­trated with Sens. Ted Cruz and Mike Lee on the Sen­ate floor Thursday that the presid­ing of­ficer — Sen. Tammy Bald­win of Wis­con­sin — ad­mon­ished mem­bers that rules re­quire them to refer to each oth­er in the third per­son.

“It’s my un­der­stand­ing that the reas­on you don’t want to send a bill over to the House who could pos­sibly put in place some very good policies for us here “¦ is that you want the Amer­ic­an people and the out­side groups that you’ve been in con­tact with to be able to watch us to­mor­row,” Cork­er said.

The of­fend­ing re­marks were call­ing a col­league “you,” but the real of­fense, in Cork­er’s view, is one the Sen­ate has been grap­pling with since Cruz’s 21-hour talk-a-thon in op­pos­i­tion of Obama­care.

Cork­er is one of a num­ber of Re­pub­lic­an sen­at­ors who all but pulled their hair out over Cruz and Lee’s tac­tics aimed at de­fund­ing Obama­care through a stop­gap fund­ing meas­ure.

Cruz and Lee want Re­pub­lic­ans to vote against clo­ture on a bill they ac­tu­ally sup­port be­cause that will al­low Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id, D-Nev., to strip the Obama­care lan­guage and change a date in the bill. Their strategy as­sumes that after the gov­ern­ment shuts down, the pub­lic will grow angry at Obama and Demo­crats over Obama­care and force them to re­peal it.

Cork­er has com­pared Cruz and Lee’s strategy to walk­ing in­to a “box canyon” from which there’s no es­cape, and he ar­gued that be­cause Demo­crats con­trol the Sen­ate and the White House, it’s im­possible to ex­pect them to be per­suaded.

The scene began over an ar­cane but com­mon Sen­ate pro­ced­ure: a un­an­im­ous con­sent re­quest, which in Eng­lish is a pe­ti­tion to pro­ceed on a meas­ure without hav­ing to tally votes. As the name sug­gests, it means that no sen­at­or ob­jects, and if one sen­at­or does, then the re­quest is denied.

Here’s what happened:

Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id, D-Nev., asked to move up a clo­ture vote and fi­nal votes on the House’s fund­ing res­ol­u­tion to Thursday night. He reasoned that the soon­er the House got the bill back, the soon­er it could act.

Lee, with Cruz seated nearby, stood to ob­ject. He reasoned that most Amer­ic­ans ex­pec­ted the vote on Fri­day or Sat­urday.

“The Amer­ic­an people are pay­ing at­ten­tion to this. The Amer­ic­an people are watch­ing this,” Lee said.

What’s the dif­fer­ence between a vote to­night and to­mor­row, Lee asked.

Re­id called their strategy a charade, and soon after that, Cork­er joined in on the floor, spar­ring with Cruz over his vote on a pro­ced­ur­al vote on a mo­tion Wed­nes­day.

“I don’t think we’ve had in the Sen­ate where we had a 21-hour fili­buster and then the per­son car­ry­ing out the fili­buster voted for the is­sue they were fili­bus­ter­ing,” Cork­er said.

Cruz shot back he voted how he said he would. It’s the second clo­ture vote he op­poses.

“I ap­pre­ci­ate the sen­at­or from Ten­ness­ee’s com­ments sup­port­ing the ma­jor­ity lead­er and I know the sen­at­or from Ten­ness­ee is learned on the Sen­ate pro­ced­ures, so that I know he must have made a mis­state­ment when he mo­ments ago sug­ges­ted that those of us who par­ti­cip­ated in the fili­buster the oth­er day some­how changed our po­s­i­tion,” Cruz said.

After some more back and forth, Cork­er laid in.

“It’s my un­der­stand­ing again, re­l­at­ive to this vote to­night hap­pen­ing in­stead of to­mor­row, is that my two col­leagues, who I re­spect, have sent out emails around the world and turned this in­to a show pos­sibly, and there­fore they want people around the world to watch maybe them and oth­ers on the Sen­ate floor. And that is tak­ing pri­or­ity over get­ting le­gis­la­tion back to the House,” he said.

Cruz then said maybe Re­id is con­fused be­cause he would be vot­ing with Cork­er on the bill. Cork­er to Cruz: Well, why did you vote with Re­id on Wed­nes­day?

After more spar­ring, Bald­win banged the gavel when the time ran out, and re­minded mem­bers that they are to refer to one an­oth­er in the third per­son.

Re­id left the floor, then re­turned.

“I’m sorry we’re go­ing to have to vote to­mor­row and not today,” he said.

What We're Following See More »
Chef Jose Andres Campaigns With Clinton
7 hours ago
White House Weighs in Against Non-Compete Contracts
8 hours ago

"The Obama administration on Tuesday called on U.S. states to ban agreements prohibiting many workers from moving to their employers’ rivals, saying it would lead to a more competitive labor market and faster wage growth. The administration said so-called non-compete agreements interfere with worker mobility and states should consider barring companies from requiring low-wage workers and other employees who are not privy to trade secrets or other special circumstances to sign them."

House Investigators Already Sharpening Their Spears for Clinton
9 hours ago

House Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz plans to spend "years, come January, probing the record of a President Hillary Clinton." Chaffetz told the Washington Post: “It’s a target-rich environment. Even before we get to Day One, we’ve got two years’ worth of material already lined up. She has four years of history at the State Department, and it ain’t good.”

Clinton Super PAC Enters the House Fray
13 hours ago

Priorities USA, the super PAC aligned with the Clinton campaign, which has already gotten involved in two Senate races, is now expanding into House races. The group released a 30 second spot which serves to hit Donald Trump and Iowa Rep. Rod Blum, who is in a tough race to win re-election in Iowa's first congressional district. The super PAC's expansion into House and Senate races shows a high level of confidence in Clinton's standing against Trump.

House to Vote on Iran Sanctions Renewal in Lame Duck
13 hours ago

Republican House leaders are planning on taking up a vote to renew the Iran Sanctions Act as soon as the lame-duck session begins in mid-November. The law, which expires on Dec. 31, permits a host of sanctions against Iran's industries, defense, and government. The renewal will likely pass the House, but its status is unclear once it reaches the Senate, and a spokesman from the White House refused to say whether President Obama would sign it into law.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.