Congress Looks Resigned to a Shutdown

The Republican “compromise” offers little space for negotiation, and Dick Durbin thinks a shutdown is coming.

Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas leave the Capitol in Washington, Friday, Sept. 27, 2013. 
National Journal
Matt Berman
Sept. 29, 2013, 7:55 a.m.

Do you think the gov­ern­ment is go­ing to shut down? That’s what CBS’s Bob Schief­fer asked Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Whip Dick Durbin, D-Ill, on Face the Na­tion Sunday morn­ing. “I’m afraid I do,” he said.

Right now, with a day and change left be­fore the gov­ern­ment shuts down if Con­gress can’t agree on how to fund it, Durbin’s pre­dic­tion is look­ing pretty sage.

If for no oth­er reas­on, that’s be­cause with so little time left, the frame of the de­bate is still far from a po­s­i­tion that could yield a real ne­go­ti­ation. On Sunday, Sens. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, and Rand Paul, R-Ky., took up a line on the budget fight that seems to prime the gov­ern­ment for a shut­down. “It’s not a good idea to give the pres­id­ent 100 per­cent of what he wants on Obama­care without com­prom­ise,” Paul said on Face the Na­tion. “We’ve been of­fer­ing him com­prom­ises.” On Meet the Press, Ted Cruz said much the same thing: 

We shouldn’t have a shut­down, which means that Harry Re­id needs to move off his ab­so­lut­ist po­s­i­tion. His po­s­i­tion, you’ve seen mul­tiple com­prom­ises from the Re­pub­lic­ans and you’ve seen zero, I mean, can you tell me any move­ment the Demo­crats have had what­so­ever?

The “com­prom­ise” that Re­pub­lic­ans are cur­rently of­fer­ing is high­lighted by a one-year delay of Obama­care. The com­prom­ise is that this ac­tion would be kinder to Sen­ate Demo­crats and Pres­id­ent Obama than de­fund­ing or re­peal­ing the health care law al­to­geth­er. It’s also a po­s­i­tion that is far to the right of what most Sen­ate Demo­crats and Obama would con­sider ne­go­ti­at­ing over.

The “com­prom­ise” line ap­pears to be the frame of choice for Re­pub­lic­ans right now. “To­night, we of­fer the Demo­crat­ic minor­ity a com­prom­ise,” Rep. John Cul­ber­son, R-Texas, said on the House floor be­fore Sunday morn­ing’s vote. Rep. Dana Rohra­bach­er, R-Cal­if., sug­ges­ted on the floor that Demo­crats were crazy not to ac­cept the one-year-delay com­prom­ise. Delay­ing Obama­care, Rand Paul said Sunday morn­ing, is a “new com­prom­ise.”

Or, as Cruz more fully put it on Meet the Press:

It is the Demo­crats who have taken the ab­so­lut­ist po­s­i­tion. Look, I’d like to re­peal every word of the law. But that wasn’t my po­s­i­tion in this fight. My po­s­i­tion in this fight was we should de­fund it, which is dif­fer­ent from re­peal. And even now what the House of Rep­res­ent­at­ives has done is a step re­moved from de­fund­ing. It’s delay­ing. Now that’s the es­sence of a com­prom­ise. For all of us who want to see it re­pealed, simply delay­ing it for Amer­ic­an fam­il­ies on the same terms as be­ing done for big cor­por­a­tions — that’s a com­prom­ise.

At the same time, Dav­id, what have the Demo­crats com­prom­ised on? Noth­ing. Zero. Their po­s­i­tion is ab­so­lutely no. How is that com­prom­ise?

Since his mara­thon speech earli­er this week, Cruz has taken a sur­pris­ingly lead­ing role among House Re­pub­lic­ans, in­clud­ing lead­ing meet­ings to push con­ser­vat­ives to hold strong against passing a con­tinu­ing res­ol­u­tion that leaves Obama­care un­touched. Right now, that’s the po­s­i­tion that seems to be dom­in­at­ing. House Ma­jor­ity Whip Kev­in Mc­Carthy, R-Cal­if., sug­ges­ted on Fox News Sunday that if the Sen­ate kills the latest House CR (which it will likely do by Monday af­ter­noon), then the House Re­pub­lic­ans still won’t plan to move much off their Obama­care com­prom­ise, and con­tin­ue to in­sist on “fun­da­ment­al changes” to the law.

Un­less Sunday morn­ing’s talk was just pos­tur­ing, or bar­ring some kind of rad­ic­al shift in ne­go­ti­at­ing strategy, the terms of a com­prom­ise to keep the gov­ern­ment open are at this point very un­likely to yield room for bi­par­tis­an ne­go­ti­ation. So if Dick Durbin is a bet­ting man, he may want to put his money where his mouth is.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4475) }}

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×