Congress has less than 10 hours to come up with an agreement to keep the government funded. That won’t be easy. But it’s not like shutting down the government is so simple, either.
A new report from the Congressional Research Service outlines what federal agencies are supposed to do if and when a shutdown occurs. One of the first steps, based on guidelines from the Office of Management and Budget, is for agency heads to “decide what agency activities are expected or otherwise legally authorized to continue during an appropriations hiatus.” Per CRS, OMB calls for agency shutdown plans to include:
“¢ a summary of agency activities that will continue and those that will cease;
“¢ an estimate of the time to complete the shutdown, to the nearest half-day;
“¢ the number of employees expected to be on-board (i.e., filled positions) before implementation of the plan;
“¢ the total number of employees to be retained, broken out into five categories of exceptions to the Antideficiency Act, including employees
1. who are paid from a resource other than annual appropriations;
2. who are necessary to perform activities expressly authorized by law;
3. who are necessary to perform activities necessarily implied by law;
4. who are necessary to the discharge of the president’s constitutional duties and powers; and
5. who are necessary to protect life and property.
According to CRS, there’s no guarantee that the employees of federal agencies on a shutdown furlough would receive back pay once the government is back up and running. There is some precedent, however, from recent shutdowns for Congress to mandate that these employees be paid retroactively.
Federal employees who are “essential,” or excepted from a furlough, would be paid for their work once payroll centers resume functioning.
In the judiciary, some funds from court filings and other fees exist that could help keep the branch afloat for a few days after a shutdown. But if a shutdown lasts long enough for those funds to dry up, the branch would just continue “essential work.”
Throughout government, there is some work that is considered essential and won’t be shut down. A 1981 OMB memo, which was in effect for the shutdowns in the ‘90s, lays out these functions:
1. Provide for the national security, including the conduct of foreign relations essential to the national security or the safety of life and property.
2. Provide for benefit payments and the performance of contract obligations under no-year or multiyear or other funds remaining available for those purposes.
3. Conduct essential activities to the extent that they protect life and property, including:
a. Medical care of inpatients and emergency outpatient care;
b. Activities essential to ensure continued public health and safety, including safe use of food and drugs and safe use of hazardous materials;
c. The continuance of air traffic control and other transportation safety functions and the protection of transport property;
d. Border and coastal protection and surveillance;
e. Protection of federal lands, buildings, waterways, equipment, and other property owned by the United States;
f. Care of prisoners and other persons in the custody of the United States;
g. Law enforcement and criminal investigations;
h. Emergency and disaster assistance;
i. Activities essential to the preservation of the essential elements of the money and banking system of the United States, including borrowing and tax-collection activities of the Treasury
j. Activities that ensure production of power and maintenance of the power distribution system; and
k. Activities necessary to maintain protection of research property
But there’s a lot that obviously won’t be running, if the patterns from the ‘90s shutdowns hold:
- New patients won’t be admitted to the National Institutes of Health, and NIH won’t be accepting hotline calls on diseases. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention will stop disease surveillance. So, you know, let’s hope there’s no sudden contagion.
- Federal law-enforcement officials will stop being tested and recruited. Delinquent child-support cases could be delayed.
- In the 1990s, 368 national parks were shut down, with a loss of 7 million visitors. National museums and monuments lost an estimated 2 million visitors.
- American tourist industries and airlines could face millions of dollars in losses due to hundreds of thousands of unprocessed visa applications and U.S. passport applications.
- American veterans lost multiple services during the ‘90s shutdowns.
- Employees of federal contractors could be furloughed without pay as funding shuts down for billions of dollars worth of contracts.
- There could be national security implications, CRS found, because the U.S. could be perceived as being physically and politically vulnerable.
In total, a government shutdown could cost the U.S. billions of dollars. That’s even with an estimated 59 percent of nondefense federal employees being exempted from the shutdown, according to an analysis from USA Today.
And if you’re a furloughed worker, don’t even think about trying to “volunteer” for work. That’s prohibited under the Anti-Deficiency Act, and is punishable by fines or even prison time.
Oh, and there are a couple groups of workers who definitely won’t be furloughed during a shutdown. Those include: The president, presidential appointees, and members of Congress. And Supreme Court justices won’t see any cuts to their pay.
What We're Following See More »
In addition to ties between Russia and the Trump campaign, Robert Mueller's team is also "examining a broad range of transactions involving Trump’s businesses as well as those of his associates, according to a person familiar with the probe. FBI investigators and others are looking at Russian purchases of apartments in Trump buildings, Trump’s involvement in a controversial SoHo development in New York with Russian associates, the 2013 Miss Universe pageant in Moscow, and Trump’s sale of a Florida mansion to a Russian oligarch in 2008, the person said. The investigation also has absorbed a money-laundering probe begun by federal prosecutors in New York into Trump’s former campaign chairman Paul Manafort."
"The House voted Thursday to reauthorize the Department of Homeland Security. The bipartisan measure passed easily by a vote of 386-41, with nine Republicans and 32 Democrats voting in opposition. If the bill makes it through the Senate, it would be the first-ever reauthorization of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) since it was created in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks." Among the provisions it contains is a mandate that the Senate confirm the Secret Service director. It also boosts funding for the Urban Area Security Initiative by $195 million per year.
In remarks scheduled to be delivered today at the American Federation of Teachers' summer conference, President Randi Weingarten "likens U.S. Education Secretary Betsy DeVos to a climate-change denier" and "says the Trump administration's school choice plans are secretly intended to starve funding from public schools. She calls taxpayer-funded private school vouchers, tuition tax credits and the like 'only slightly more polite cousins of segregation.'" The pro-voucher Center for Education Reform said teachers should "consider inviting Weingarten’s resignation."
"President Trump has confidence in Attorney General Jeff Sessions, despite his criticism of the Justice Department head's decision to recuse himself from the Russia probe, the White House said Thursday. 'Clearly he has confidence in him or he would not be the attorney general,' spokeswoman Sarah Huckabee Sanders told reporters at an off-camera briefing."
"The American Civil Liberties Union is suing the Trump administration for records on an executive order President Trump reportedly planned to release targeting the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people. In a lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on Thursday, ACLU claimed the departments of Health and Human Services, Justice, Labor, and Treasury violated the Freedom of Information Act by failing to release the records it requested on the reported draft order."