Despite months of Republican talk about rebranding the party to broaden its appeal, nearly half of all Americans say the GOP hasn’t changed much since it lost the 2012 presidential election.
According to the latest United Technologies/National Journal Congressional Connection Poll, 46 percent of respondents said “there has been no change” in the Republican Party’s views since the 2012 election.
Thirty-two percent of respondents said the GOP is “further from representing” their own views, twice as many as those who said the party has gotten closer to them (16 percent). Not surprisingly, Democrats were most likely to say the GOP has moved further away from their views, but a majority of independent voters (52 percent) said they had seen no changes in the GOP’s views since the last election.
In the months after the 2012 election, the Republican National Committee planned an “autopsy” of the party’s electoral failures. Part of the report’s goal was mechanical: President Obama’s win demonstrated that the Democratic Party’s get-out-the-vote and targeting techniques had outstripped the GOP’s, and party leaders wanted to close the gap. But another goal was to lay the groundwork for a more inclusive Republican Party. Presidential nominee Mitt Romney essentially matched his party’s best-ever showing by a challenger among white voters, but it was not enough to win the White House, partly because Obama matched Democrats’ best-ever performance among Hispanic voters.
That prompted RNC Chairman Reince Priebus to say his party and its policies had to be “more sellable, more believable, more heartfelt to people” and that “we cannot be a party of just white people.” But more than nine months later, Republicans are still struggling to connect with two of their target groups — women and nonwhites.
According to the United Technologies/National Journal Congressional Connection Poll, 14 percent of female poll respondents said the party had moved closer to them, but 33 percent said it had moved further and 46 percent said there had been no change. Nonwhites responded at almost exactly the same rates: 14 percent said the party had moved closer to them, 34 percent said it was further away and the biggest group, 48 percent, said there had not been a change.
A follow-up question further illuminated the push and pull that animates the GOP. Of the poll respondents who said the Republican Party had moved away from them this year, most (57 percent) said the GOP had gotten too conservative. But nearly two-thirds of the Republicans and GOP-leaning independents who said the party had moved away said it was no longer conservative enough.
Overall, that works out to 13 percent of registered Republicans saying the party as a whole is not conservative enough for them — a relatively small fraction, but also one that is highly motivated and often influential. (Virtually no incumbent Republican senators manage to run for reelection anymore without some sort of challenge from the right, while the number of competitive House primaries is on the rise, too.)
The poll, conducted Sept. 25-29, interviewed 1,005 adults over landline and cell phones. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.7 percentage points.
What We're Following See More »
Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.
Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”
Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."
In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-expected primary battle behind her, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (D) is no longer going on the air in upcoming primary states. “Team Clinton hasn’t spent a single cent in … California, Indiana, Kentucky, Oregon and West Virginia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “campaign has spent a little more than $1 million in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone backer in the Senate, said the candidate should end his presidential campaign if he’s losing to Hillary Clinton after the primary season concludes in June, breaking sharply with the candidate who is vowing to take his insurgent bid to the party convention in Philadelphia.”
The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."