Just a few days after a coalition of 20 mostly conservative groups jumped into the debate over the federal biofuels mandate and demanded full repeal, one prominent conservative leader said he’s willing to accept something less — for now.
“Do I want repeal? Yes,” said Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform. “Would something else be an improvement over where we are? Absolutely.”
Norquist’s comment comes just days after his group and several others — including Americans for Prosperity, the American Energy Alliance, and American Commitment — sent Congress an open letter requesting full repeal of the renewable-fuel standard, and nothing less.
The standard, which requires an increasing amount of biofuels — mostly corn-based ethanol — to be blended with the nation’s gasoline supply each year, is currently under review by leaders of the House Energy and Commerce Committee.
“It has come to our attention that Congress is considering legislation this fall to reform the renewable-fuel standard,” the groups wrote. “We, collectively and individually, believe the only reform to this failed government mandate should be to repeal the RFS.”
But on Monday, Norquist took a step back from the repeal-only stance. “We should repeal as much of the mandate as quickly as we can, but if we can only get rid of part of it now, we’ll get rid of some part of it now,” he said. “We’ll take that while we work towards repeal.”
House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton, R-Mich., and ranking member Henry Waxman, D-Calif., are working on legislation that somehow reforms the policy but doesn’t eliminate it altogether.
The task is a difficult one, with different stakeholders pulling in different directions. Refineries and automakers would prefer no blending mandate at all, corn growers want to maximize the use of corn, and agricultural interests are concerned that diverting corn for fuel is raising food prices.
The mandate, created in 2005 and strengthened in 2007 in an attempt to wean the nation off foreign oil, has come under bipartisan scrutiny in the past year in the face of high corn prices and manipulation of the market the policy created.
According to an industry source close to the committee, lawmakers are considering a freeze on the amount of ethanol refiners can blend with gasoline — placing it at or near the current level — along with expanded waiver provisions for states and a weighted credit system for refiners selling biofuels on the basis of the fuel’s carbon intensity.
Nothing is set in stone yet. And that’s got some otherwise vocal leaders withholding opinions on anything short of a full repeal of the mandate.
“Our long-standing position on this issue has been let’s fold up the tent on this program and get rid of it completely,” said Thomas Pyle, president of the American Energy Alliance.
Pyle wouldn’t comment on other potential reforms, though. “There hasn’t yet been a substantive proposal showing a path to reform, and you can’t comment on something you haven’t seen,” he said. “You hear lots of things but until there’s a proposal out there our analysts can review, we’re just like everyone else, basing it on rumors and reports.”
What We're Following See More »
Donald Trump is planning to reverse an Obama-era order requiring that schools allow students to use the bathroom that coincides with their gender identity. Trump "has green-lighted the plan for the Justice Department and Education Department to send a “Dear Colleague” letter to schools rescinding the guidance." A case is going before the Supreme Court on March 28 in which Gavin Grimm, a transgender high school student, is suing his high school for forbidding him to use the men's room.
Retired Russian diplomats and members of Vladimir Putin's staff are compiling a dossier "on Donald Trump's psychological makeup" for the Russian leader. "Among its preliminary conclusions is that the new American leader is a risk-taker who can be naïve, according to a senior Kremlin adviser."
Donald Trump is set to issue a new and more focused executive order clarifying the scope of his travel ban, hoping that the order will survive legal challenges. The new order would focus on the same seven countries, "but would only bar entry to those without a visa and who have never entered the United States before. Unlike the original order, people from those countries who already have permanent U.S. residency (green cards) or visas would not face any restrictions." Some lawyers believe the government will now have much stronger standing, though lawyers who challenged the initial order see the same core problems with the forthcoming ban.