Conservatives Unite Against Biofuels Mandate, With One Notable Exception

WASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 12: Americans for Tax Reform President Grover Norquist speaks during a press conference discussing the taxation of marijuana businesses outside the U.S. Capitol September 12, 2013 in Washington, DC. The National Cannabis Industry Association is seeking tax reform to change the current policy that requires medical marijuana providers to pay taxes based on gross receipts rather than income. 
National Journal
Amy Harder and Clare Foran
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Amy Harder Clare Foran
Sept. 30, 2013, 5 p.m.

Just a few days after a co­ali­tion of 20 mostly con­ser­vat­ive groups jumped in­to the de­bate over the fed­er­al bio­fuels man­date and de­man­ded full re­peal, one prom­in­ent con­ser­vat­ive lead­er said he’s will­ing to ac­cept something less — for now.

“Do I want re­peal? Yes,” said Grover Nor­quist, pres­id­ent of Amer­ic­ans for Tax Re­form. “Would something else be an im­prove­ment over where we are? Ab­so­lutely.”

Nor­quist’s com­ment comes just days after his group and sev­er­al oth­ers — in­clud­ing Amer­ic­ans for Prosper­ity, the Amer­ic­an En­ergy Al­li­ance, and Amer­ic­an Com­mit­ment — sent Con­gress an open let­ter re­quest­ing full re­peal of the re­new­able-fuel stand­ard, and noth­ing less.

The stand­ard, which re­quires an in­creas­ing amount of bio­fuels — mostly corn-based eth­an­ol — to be blen­ded with the na­tion’s gas­ol­ine sup­ply each year, is cur­rently un­der re­view by lead­ers of the House En­ergy and Com­merce Com­mit­tee.

“It has come to our at­ten­tion that Con­gress is con­sid­er­ing le­gis­la­tion this fall to re­form the re­new­able-fuel stand­ard,” the groups wrote. “We, col­lect­ively and in­di­vidu­ally, be­lieve the only re­form to this failed gov­ern­ment man­date should be to re­peal the RFS.”

But on Monday, Nor­quist took a step back from the re­peal-only stance. “We should re­peal as much of the man­date as quickly as we can, but if we can only get rid of part of it now, we’ll get rid of some part of it now,” he said. “We’ll take that while we work to­wards re­peal.”

House En­ergy and Com­merce Com­mit­tee Chair­man Fred Up­ton, R-Mich., and rank­ing mem­ber Henry Wax­man, D-Cal­if., are work­ing on le­gis­la­tion that some­how re­forms the policy but doesn’t elim­in­ate it al­to­geth­er.

The task is a dif­fi­cult one, with dif­fer­ent stake­hold­ers pulling in dif­fer­ent dir­ec­tions. Re­finer­ies and auto­makers would prefer no blend­ing man­date at all, corn grow­ers want to max­im­ize the use of corn, and ag­ri­cul­tur­al in­terests are con­cerned that di­vert­ing corn for fuel is rais­ing food prices.

The man­date, cre­ated in 2005 and strengthened in 2007 in an at­tempt to wean the na­tion off for­eign oil, has come un­der bi­par­tis­an scru­tiny in the past year in the face of high corn prices and ma­nip­u­la­tion of the mar­ket the policy cre­ated.

Ac­cord­ing to an in­dustry source close to the com­mit­tee, law­makers are con­sid­er­ing a freeze on the amount of eth­an­ol re­finers can blend with gas­ol­ine — pla­cing it at or near the cur­rent level — along with ex­pan­ded waiver pro­vi­sions for states and a weighted cred­it sys­tem for re­finers selling bio­fuels on the basis of the fuel’s car­bon in­tens­ity.

Noth­ing is set in stone yet. And that’s got some oth­er­wise vo­cal lead­ers with­hold­ing opin­ions on any­thing short of a full re­peal of the man­date.

“Our long-stand­ing po­s­i­tion on this is­sue has been let’s fold up the tent on this pro­gram and get rid of it com­pletely,” said Thomas Pyle, pres­id­ent of the Amer­ic­an En­ergy Al­li­ance.

Pyle wouldn’t com­ment on oth­er po­ten­tial re­forms, though. “There hasn’t yet been a sub­stant­ive pro­pos­al show­ing a path to re­form, and you can’t com­ment on something you haven’t seen,” he said. “You hear lots of things but un­til there’s a pro­pos­al out there our ana­lysts can re­view, we’re just like every­one else, basing it on ru­mors and re­ports.”

What We're Following See More »
Morning Consult Poll: Clinton Decisively Won Debate
2 days ago

"According to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll, the first national post-debate survey, 43 percent of registered voters said the Democratic candidate won, compared with 26 percent who opted for the Republican Party’s standard bearer. Her 6-point lead over Trump among likely voters is unchanged from our previous survey: Clinton still leads Trump 42 percent to 36 percent in the race for the White House, with Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson taking 9 percent of the vote."

Trump Draws Laughs, Boos at Al Smith Dinner
3 days ago

After a lighthearted beginning, Donald Trump's appearance at the Al Smith charity dinner in New York "took a tough turn as the crowd repeatedly booed the GOP nominee for his sharp-edged jokes about his rival Hillary Clinton."

McMullin Leads in New Utah Poll
3 days ago

Evan McMul­lin came out on top in a Emer­son Col­lege poll of Utah with 31% of the vote. Donald Trump came in second with 27%, while Hillary Clin­ton took third with 24%. Gary John­son re­ceived 5% of the vote in the sur­vey.

Quinnipiac Has Clinton Up by 7
3 days ago

A new Quin­nipi­ac Uni­versity poll finds Hillary Clin­ton lead­ing Donald Trump by seven percentage points, 47%-40%. Trump’s “lead among men and white voters all but” van­ished from the uni­versity’s early Oc­to­ber poll. A new PPRI/Brook­ings sur­vey shows a much bigger lead, with Clinton up 51%-36%. And an IBD/TIPP poll leans the other way, showing a vir­tu­al dead heat, with Trump tak­ing 41% of the vote to Clin­ton’s 40% in a four-way match­up.

Trump: I’ll Accept the Results “If I Win”
3 days ago

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.