Can Reid’s Shutdown Strategy Hold?

Two men stand on the plaza of the U.S. Capitol Building as storm clouds fill the sky, June 13, 2013 in Washington, D.C. 
Mark Wilson/Getty Images
Michael Catalini
Oct. 1, 2013, 4:19 p.m.

With Demo­crats and Re­pub­lic­ans squab­bling fiercely over how to re­open the gov­ern­ment, it’s Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id — the former box­er — who com­pares law­makers’ bick­er­ing to a school­yard brawl.

“We are not go­ing to be bul­lied,” Re­id said Tues­day. “We have done everything we can, and we’ve done it very reas­on­ably.”

As Re­id’s 54-seat ma­jor­ity is tested to the lim­it by the first gov­ern­ment shut­down in 17 years, the Nevada Demo­crat’s strategy has been simple: Do not give in to Re­pub­lic­an de­mands to undo, ex­cise, or delay any part of the Af­ford­able Care Act.

It’s a strategy that has pres­sure-tested unity among Sen­ate Demo­crats, who have so far stood fast in a series of high-pro­file votes to turn away House pro­pos­als that would have ended the stan­doff but handed Re­pub­lic­ans something to brag about.

“This is a demo­cracy. This can­not be how we gov­ern,” said Sen. Eliza­beth War­ren, D-Mass. “And I think that has been one of Harry Re­id’s strongest mes­sages: We can­not hand them the stick to beat us with.”

Wheth­er Re­id can hold Demo­crats to­geth­er as the shut­down drags on — there is no sign that it will end in com­ing days — re­mains un­clear. But House Re­pub­lic­ans have already scaled back their of­fers, go­ing from a full re­peal of Obama­care, to a full delay, to a delay of a piece of the pro­gram. Re­id, backed by his caucus and Pres­id­ent Obama, has re­mained steady in his in­sist­ence that House Re­pub­lic­ans ad­opt the con­tinu­ing res­ol­u­tion the Sen­ate passed on Fri­day.

The latest House sug­ges­tion in­volves ad­opt­ing a piece­meal ap­proach to fund­ing gov­ern­ment, with in­di­vidu­al res­ol­u­tions to fund na­tion­al parks, Vet­er­ans Af­fairs, and the Dis­trict of Columbia. Re­id shot that idea down, too.

“Here’s their plan: Some of the rabble-rousers over there have said what they want to do is take little pieces of the gov­ern­ment “¦ and this will go on for weeks, but what won’t get fun­ded is Obama­care,” he said, adding that “this is not ser­i­ous.”

Re­pub­lic­ans say Re­id re­fuses to ne­go­ti­ate and com­prom­ise, and that he’s mak­ing life dif­fi­cult for some Demo­crats fa­cing reelec­tion next year. But if any Demo­crats are sweat­ing, they have non­ethe­less stood by Re­id.

“I think he’s been very clear and ab­so­lutely right about what’s at stake here,” said Sen. Ben Cardin, D-Md. “So I give him very high marks. It’s clear we have the votes here in the [Sen­ate] to keep the gov­ern­ment open. The House won’t al­low a vote on it. I think Sen­at­or Re­id’s been very ef­fect­ive in point­ing that out.”

Sen­ate Demo­crats in­sist that House Re­pub­lic­ans will ul­ti­mately shoulder the brunt of pub­lic an­ger over the shut­down, but that’s a tide that could run both ways. Thus far, Re­id and his al­lies don’t seem to fear any back­lash.

“He’s done a really good job,” War­ren said. “He’s held every­one to­geth­er.”

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
4 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
5 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×