Can Reid’s Shutdown Strategy Hold?

Two men stand on the plaza of the U.S. Capitol Building as storm clouds fill the sky, June 13, 2013 in Washington, D.C. 
Mark Wilson/Getty Images
Michael Catalin
Add to Briefcase
Michael Catalin
Oct. 1, 2013, 4:19 p.m.

With Demo­crats and Re­pub­lic­ans squab­bling fiercely over how to re­open the gov­ern­ment, it’s Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id — the former box­er — who com­pares law­makers’ bick­er­ing to a school­yard brawl.

“We are not go­ing to be bul­lied,” Re­id said Tues­day. “We have done everything we can, and we’ve done it very reas­on­ably.”

As Re­id’s 54-seat ma­jor­ity is tested to the lim­it by the first gov­ern­ment shut­down in 17 years, the Nevada Demo­crat’s strategy has been simple: Do not give in to Re­pub­lic­an de­mands to undo, ex­cise, or delay any part of the Af­ford­able Care Act.

It’s a strategy that has pres­sure-tested unity among Sen­ate Demo­crats, who have so far stood fast in a series of high-pro­file votes to turn away House pro­pos­als that would have ended the stan­doff but handed Re­pub­lic­ans something to brag about.

“This is a demo­cracy. This can­not be how we gov­ern,” said Sen. Eliza­beth War­ren, D-Mass. “And I think that has been one of Harry Re­id’s strongest mes­sages: We can­not hand them the stick to beat us with.”

Wheth­er Re­id can hold Demo­crats to­geth­er as the shut­down drags on — there is no sign that it will end in com­ing days — re­mains un­clear. But House Re­pub­lic­ans have already scaled back their of­fers, go­ing from a full re­peal of Obama­care, to a full delay, to a delay of a piece of the pro­gram. Re­id, backed by his caucus and Pres­id­ent Obama, has re­mained steady in his in­sist­ence that House Re­pub­lic­ans ad­opt the con­tinu­ing res­ol­u­tion the Sen­ate passed on Fri­day.

The latest House sug­ges­tion in­volves ad­opt­ing a piece­meal ap­proach to fund­ing gov­ern­ment, with in­di­vidu­al res­ol­u­tions to fund na­tion­al parks, Vet­er­ans Af­fairs, and the Dis­trict of Columbia. Re­id shot that idea down, too.

“Here’s their plan: Some of the rabble-rousers over there have said what they want to do is take little pieces of the gov­ern­ment “¦ and this will go on for weeks, but what won’t get fun­ded is Obama­care,” he said, adding that “this is not ser­i­ous.”

Re­pub­lic­ans say Re­id re­fuses to ne­go­ti­ate and com­prom­ise, and that he’s mak­ing life dif­fi­cult for some Demo­crats fa­cing reelec­tion next year. But if any Demo­crats are sweat­ing, they have non­ethe­less stood by Re­id.

“I think he’s been very clear and ab­so­lutely right about what’s at stake here,” said Sen. Ben Cardin, D-Md. “So I give him very high marks. It’s clear we have the votes here in the [Sen­ate] to keep the gov­ern­ment open. The House won’t al­low a vote on it. I think Sen­at­or Re­id’s been very ef­fect­ive in point­ing that out.”

Sen­ate Demo­crats in­sist that House Re­pub­lic­ans will ul­ti­mately shoulder the brunt of pub­lic an­ger over the shut­down, but that’s a tide that could run both ways. Thus far, Re­id and his al­lies don’t seem to fear any back­lash.

“He’s done a really good job,” War­ren said. “He’s held every­one to­geth­er.”

What We're Following See More »
NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
COMMISSIONERS NEED TO DELIBERATE MORE
FCC Pushes Vote on Set-Top Boxes
5 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Federal regulators on Thursday delayed a vote on a proposal to reshape the television market by freeing consumers from cable box rentals, putting into doubt a plan that has pitted technology companies against cable television providers. ... The proposal will still be considered for a future vote. But Tom Wheeler, chairman of the F.C.C., said commissioners needed more discussions."

Source:
UNTIL DEC. 9, ANYWAY
Obama Signs Bill to Fund Government
11 hours ago
THE LATEST
REDSKINS IMPLICATIONS
SCOTUS to Hear Case on Offensive Trademarks
11 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

"The Supreme Court is taking up a First Amendment clash over the government’s refusal to register offensive trademarks, a case that could affect the Washington Redskins in their legal fight over the team name. The justices agreed Thursday to hear a dispute involving an Asian-American rock band called the Slants, but they did not act on a separate request to hear the higher-profile Redskins case at the same time." Still, any precedent set by the case could have ramifications for the Washington football team.

Source:
IT’S ALL CLINTON
Reliable Poll Data Coming in RE: Debate #1
13 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
×