Why Is President Obama Lecturing Me?

The president is right on the merits, wrong on the tone.

President Barack Obama speaks alongside people who will benefit from health insurance plans under the Affordable Care Act, as well speaks about the government shutdown in the Rose Garden of the White House, October 1, 2013.
National Journal
Ron Fournier
Oct. 2, 2013, 5:43 a.m.

Pres­id­ent Obama ac­cused Re­pub­lic­ans on Tues­day of launch­ing an “ideo­lo­gic­al cru­sade” to hold the “eco­nomy host­age” over “ideo­lo­gic­al” and “reck­less” de­mands to dis­mantle his health care law. “In oth­er words,” he said, “they de­man­ded ransom just for do­ing their jobs.”

Sev­er­al read­ers who sup­port Obama said they were dis­ap­poin­ted by the tone of his re­marks. One from Ohio wrote, “He needs to chill. He looks de­fens­ive and has no reas­on to be.” An in­de­pend­ent voter in Michigan wrote, “He seems like an angry kid.” A Mary­land Demo­crat com­plained, “I love the man, but why is he yelling at me?”

I had a sim­il­ar re­ac­tion listen­ing to the re­marks shortly after writ­ing a column in de­fense of Obama’s po­s­i­tion.

Is the pres­id­ent lec­tur­ing, be­littling Amer­ic­ans right now? Or the GOP House? Comms is­sue: Voters watch­ing might not know dif­fer­ence

— Ron Fourni­er (@ron_­fourni­er) Oc­to­ber 1, 2013

An oth­er­wise sol­id ar­gu­ment can be un­der­cut by the words a pres­id­ent chooses and the tone that greases them. It’s not enough to be right as a lead­er if you in­sult voters with your right­eous­ness. It’s not just Obama. Seni­or White House ad­viser Dan Pfeif­fer re­cently said the White House is op­posed to “ne­go­ti­at­ing with people with a bomb strapped to their chests,” an ir­re­spons­ible and over­heated im­age.

The Re­pub­lic­an Party en­gin­eered this stale­mate and is likely to shoulder most of the blame. That is, un­less the Demo­crat­ic Party matches the GOP on pet­ti­ness, stub­born­ness, and dem­agoguery. Pres­id­ents Re­agan and Clin­ton had a way of at­tack­ing their rivals with a smile, mak­ing their point without mak­ing them­selves look smal­ler. Can Obama?

Twenty-six hun­dred words in­to a long-win­ded ad­dress, Obama took a breath and said, “Let me re­peat, I will not ne­go­ti­ate over Con­gress’ re­spons­ib­il­ity to pay bills it’s already racked up. I’m not go­ing to al­low any­body to drag the good name of the United States of Amer­ica through the mud just to re­fight a settled elec­tion or ex­tract ideo­lo­gic­al de­mands.” Ten sen­tences later, he ad­ded, “We’re bet­ter than this. Cer­tainly, the Amer­ic­an people are a lot bet­ter than this.”

Yes, they are. And they might ex­pect a bet­ter tone from their pres­id­ent.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
6 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
7 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×