Despite Practical and Privacy Concerns, Doctors See Potential in Google Glass

An attendee is fitted with Google Glass during the Google I/O developer conference on May 17, 2013 in San Francisco, California. Eight members of the Congressional Bi-Partisan Privacy Caucus sent a letter to Google co-founder and CEO Larry Page seeking answers to privacy questions and concerns surrounding Google's photo and video-equipped glasses called 'Google Glass'. The panel wants to know if the high tech eyeware could infringe on the privacy of Americans. Google has been asked to respond to a series of questions by June 14.
National Journal
Alexis Hauk
Add to Briefcase
Alexis Hauk
Oct. 3, 2013, 4:30 a.m.

Sure, it might make you look like you walked off a Star Trek set. And sure, Newt Gin­grich was mocked for wear­ing it to the zoo. But the ripples of ex­cite­ment sur­round­ing Google Glass ex­tend bey­ond the tech world. The new, wear­able com­puter also has some doc­tors wired.

The tech­no­logy, which crosses a com­puter with a pair of eye­glasses, has the po­ten­tial to im­prove con­tact among doc­tors and spe­cial­ists, strengthen doc­tor-pa­tient re­la­tion­ships, and train med­ic­al stu­dents, its early ad­op­ters say. The Af­ford­able Care Act “em­phas­izes qual­ity, safety, and ef­fi­ciency rather than quant­ity of care,” John Halamka, chief in­form­a­tion of­ficer at the Beth Is­rael Dea­con­ess Med­ic­al Cen­ter, says in an email. He is re­fer­ring to a num­ber of pro­vi­sions in the 2010 health re­form law that en­cour­age pro­viders to de­liv­er high­er-qual­ity care at a lower price. “Hos­pit­als and pro­viders will in­vest [in] tools that en­sure the pa­tient gets the right care at the right time,” he con­tin­ues. He sees Glass as one of them.

Last month, sur­geon Chris­toph­er Kaed­ing re­paired an in­jured knee lig­a­ment on a pa­tient while wear­ing Glass, which re­cor­ded the pro­ced­ure. The un­der­tak­ing was the brainchild of Is­mail Na­beel, Kaed­ing’s col­league at Ohio State Uni­versity, who ap­plied this spring to be an “ex­plorer,” Google’s name for the ex­clus­ive group of early ad­op­ters of the tech­no­logy. He and Kaed­ing will present the video and the rest of their find­ings on the uses of Google Glass as a med­ic­al-school tool at the Ohio Edu­ca­tion­al Tech­no­logy Con­fer­ence in Janu­ary.

When pre­par­ing for the ACL sur­gery, Na­beel had con­cerns about Glass’s bat­tery life, so they used a sep­ar­ate bat­tery pack. An­oth­er is­sue was com­pli­ance with HIPAA pa­tient-pri­vacy pro­to­cols while trans­mit­ting in­form­a­tion. In this case, the doc­tors showed a live stream via an en­cryp­ted net­work to ap­prox­im­ately 15 clin­ic­al stu­dents us­ing en­cryp­ted devices, laptops, and iPads. Na­beel says the ACL-sur­gery foot­age is be­ing held “in an en­cryp­ted HIPAA-com­pli­ant stor­age serv­er at the med­ic­al cen­ter for fu­ture use.”

The abil­ity to con­nect with ex­perts off­s­ite also be­ne­fits less ex­per­i­enced doc­tors, says Mar­tin Olsen, an OB-GYN and pro­fess­or at East Ten­ness­ee State Uni­versity. “Let’s say an emer­gency med­ic­al tech­ni­cian is do­ing a de­liv­ery in the field,” Olsen says. “An ob­stet­ri­cian [else­where] can help them through it.”

Glass could save time in the trans­ition from the am­bu­lance to the emer­gency room, al­low­ing an EMS tech­ni­cian to send the im­ages to the ER so the doc­tors there can pre­pare be­fore the pa­tient even ar­rives. And un­like the smart­phone or iPad, Glass is hands-free. “As an emer­gency phys­i­cian, I can tell you, my hands are of­ten used de­liv­er­ing pa­tient care. The no­tion of wear­ing a com­puter that would en­able me to see pa­tient data — that is very use­ful,” Halamka says.

Pa­tients are more likely to feel con­nec­ted with their doc­tor if they can make eye con­tact, al­beit through Glass, he ar­gues, as op­posed to try­ing to con­nect with a doc­tor as they fiddle with a sep­ar­ate com­puter screen. Halamka, also a pro­fess­or at Har­vard Med­ic­al School, has be­come a self-de­scribed “cham­pi­on” of Glass at Beth Is­rael.

Con­cerns over the safety of pa­tient data are one obstacle the tech­no­logy will have to over­come, and Halamka is con­fid­ent it will. He be­lieves hos­pit­als can keep pa­tient in­form­a­tion as safe as banks keep their cus­tom­ers’ ac­count in­form­a­tion. When it comes to en­cryp­tion and se­cur­ity pro­tocol, he says, “Our ar­chi­tec­ture is the same.”

Prac­tic­al con­cerns with Glass’s pro­lif­er­a­tion in hos­pit­als also abound. One is the risk of spread­ing in­fec­tion as the in­stru­ment is car­ried from room to room. Halamka says his team now wipes down with al­co­hol the iPads they have in­cor­por­ated in­to their work. “I pre­sume we’ll do the same thing with Glass,” he says.

Still, look­ing in­to the fu­ture, it’s clear to Halamka, Na­beel, and Olsen that Glass has enorm­ous po­ten­tial to be, as Halamka puts it, “Not only a way of look­ing at data, but also a way of look­ing at wis­dom.”

“There’s more [writ­ten about] medi­cine every year in journ­als than a doc­tor can read in a life­time. Keep­ing all the evid­ence straight is hard,” he says. He de­scribes Glass as a kind of Ter­min­at­or-like in­stant eval­u­ation screen (ex­cept with good in­ten­tions): “This is Mrs. Smith. She has the fol­low­ing is­sue, and here’s the evid­ence that sug­gests the best way to treat her now.”

Such col­lec­tion of data on pa­tients as well as med­ic­al re­search will likely be pos­sible once Glass, and the vari­ous com­pan­ies de­vel­op­ing apps for it, evolve. There are only about 2,000 users of the $1,500 eye­wear right now, in­clud­ing such celebrit­ies as rap­per Soulja Boy and Star Trek star LeVar Bur­ton (one might say the “ori­gin­al Glass Ex­plorer”), and a hand­ful of doc­tors like Na­beel and Kaed­ing.

“I think it’s one of those tools where, once you have it, you won’t go back — just like a cell phone,” Olsen says. Halamka agrees. “Years ago, people stum­bling across cross­walks with smart­phones was crazy. Now I walk through an air­port and there’s not a single per­son not do­ing it,” he says.

What We're Following See More »
WITH LIVE BLOGGING
Trump Deposition Video Is Online
23 hours ago
STAFF PICKS

The video of Donald Trump's deposition in his case against restaurateur Jeffrey Zakarian is now live. Slate's Jim Newell and Josh Voorhees are live-blogging it while they watch.

Source:
SOUND LEVEL AFFECTED
Debate Commission Admits Issues with Trump’s Mic
1 days ago
THE LATEST

The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.

Source:
TRUMP VS. CHEFS
Trump Deposition Video to Be Released
1 days ago
THE LATEST

"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."

Source:
A CANDIDATE TO BE ‘PROUD’ OF
Chicago Tribune Endorses Gary Johnson
1 days ago
THE LATEST

No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."

NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
×