The Case for Some Shutdown Urgency

The danger of the shutdown isn’t that it happened. The danger is that it continues.

A US Senate employee walks through the Capitol Crypt at the US Capitol in Washington, DC, September 25, 2013.
National Journal
Brian Resnick
Oct. 3, 2013, 8:37 a.m.

Here’s why the shut­down should be re­solved as quickly and com­pre­hens­ively as pos­sible.

The shut­down costs $300 mil­lion a day, $1.6 bil­lion a week.

But that de­crease in GDP could be re­covered if Con­gress votes to give fur­loughed em­ploy­ees back pay.

If the shut­down drags on, it can take con­sumer con­fid­ence down with it.

If the gov­ern­ment back pays its work­ers, it will be out a lot of cash. The longer the shut­down, the more money it will lose by the time it’s over.

Open­ing the gov­ern­ment would al­low law­makers to solve the more press­ing prob­lem — the debt ceil­ing.

The shutdown costs $300 million a day, $1.6 billion a week.

That’s the amount ana­lyst firm IHS Glob­al In­sight es­tim­ates the shut­down is cost­ing in terms of lost eco­nom­ic out­put. Ac­cord­ing to re­search firm Mac­roe­co­nom­ic Ad­visers, a two-week shut­down would de­crease gross do­mest­ic product growth by 0.3 per­cent. Three weeks would raise that to 0.5 per­cent. A shut­down last­ing the en­tire month of Oc­to­ber would de­crease the GDP by 0.7 per­cent. Moody’s Ana­lyt­ics es­tim­ates a high­er cost, say­ing a three- or four-week shut­down will de­crease growth by 1.4 per­cent. Yes, $1.6 bil­lion a week is min­is­cule com­pared with the $16 tril­lion U.S. eco­nomy. But it will add up as the shut­down con­tin­ues.

But that decrease in GDP could be recovered if Congress votes to give furloughed employees back pay.

More than 800,000 work­ers are fur­loughed dur­ing the shut­down. But if they were to get paid for their time away from work, GDP would re­bound. “Fol­low­ing a shut­down, real com­pens­a­tion would simply re­turn to its pre­vi­ous level, tem­por­ar­ily boost­ing GDP growth by roughly the same amount that the de­cline in real com­pens­a­tion re­duced it,” Mac­roe­co­nom­ic Ad­visers ex­plains. While there is pre­ced­ent for Con­gress to give work­ers back pay after a shut­down, it’s no guar­an­tee.

If the shutdown drags on, it can take consumer confidence down with it.

The longer the shut­down goes on, the more un­cer­tainty arises in the eco­nomy (es­pe­cially as the debt ceil­ing ap­proaches). Con­sumer con­fid­ence is a tricky thing to pre­dict, but ana­lysts from IHS, Ox­ford Eco­nom­ics, TD Se­cur­it­ies USA, and oth­ers are all telling re­port­ers the same thing: A long shut­down could only erode con­fid­ence.

At The At­lantic, Mat­thew O’Bri­en, points out that eco­nom­ic con­fid­ence already began to drop as the shut­down be­came more likely, as seen in this chart from Gal­lup.

If the government back pays its workers, it will be out a lot of cash. The longer the shutdown, the more money it will lose by the time it's over.

The eco­nomy will prob­ably re­bound if the gov­ern­ment pays its work­ers for their fur­loughs — but that’s all wasted money. Es­sen­tially, the gov­ern­ment will be pay­ing for paid va­ca­tions. The Con­gres­sion­al Re­search Ser­vice, cit­ing the Of­fice of Man­age­ment and Budget, says the 28-day shut­down of 1995-96 cost the gov­ern­ment $1.4 bil­lion. And in­de­pend­ent re­search sug­gests that num­ber should be even high­er. In today’s dol­lars, that would be more than $2 bil­lion.

The shut­down also costs some money it­self, fig­ur­ing in the se­cur­ity needed to close off usu­ally open areas such as me­mori­als and na­tion­al parks, and strange pro­to­cols such as re­pla­cing a web­site with a “We’re closed” no­tice even though it may be cheap­er just to leave the site up and un-up­dated.

By try­ing to de­fund a pro­gram, Re­pub­lic­ans will be throw­ing out a lot of gov­ern­ment cash.

Opening the government would allow lawmakers to solve the more pressing problem — the debt ceiling.

Treas­ury Sec­ret­ary Jac­ob Lew put in no un­cer­tain terms that the U.S. gov­ern­ment could be­gin de­fault­ing on its debts start­ing Oct. 17 if the debt ceil­ing isn’t raised. This threatens the full faith and cred­it of the coun­try and it would rattle mar­kets, in­crease in­terest rates on U.S. Treas­ury bonds, and up­set the no­tion that the U.S. eco­nomy is the most stable in the world­wide eco­nomy.

In oth­er word: Con­gress, get a move on!

What We're Following See More »
SHE’LL HAVE A ROLE WITH CLINTON CAMP
Wasserman Schultz to Resign at Week’s End
7 hours ago
THE LATEST

"After hours of private talks," Debbie Wasserman Schultz agreed to step down as chair of the Democratic National Committee after the convention ends. In the wake of the convention intrigue, Hillary Clinton announced she's making Wasserman Schultz "the honorary chair of her campaign's 50-state program."

Source:
MARCIA FUDGE TO PRESIDE
Wasserman Schultz Stripped of Convention Duties
15 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz "will not have a major speaking role or preside over daily convention proceedings this week," and is under increasing pressure to resign. The DNC Rules Committee on Saturday named Ohio Democratic Rep. Marcia Fudge as "permanent chair of the convention." At issue: internal DNC emails leaked by Wikileaks that show how "the DNC favored Clinton during the primary and tried to take down Bernie Sanders by questioning his religion."

Source:
EARLY BUMP FOR TRUMP?
New Round of Polls Show a Tight Race
2 days ago
THE LATEST
  • A Rasmussen Reports poll shows Donald Trump ahead of Hillary Clinton, 43%-42%, the fourth week in a row he's led the poll (one of the few poll in which he's led consistently of late).
  • A Reuters/Ipsos survey shows Clinton leading 40%-36%. In a four-way race, she maintains her four-point lead, 39%-35%, with Gary Johnson and Jill Stein pulling 7% and 3%, respectively.
  • And the LA Times/USC daily tracking poll shows a dead heat, with Trump ahead by about half a percentage point.
BELLWETHER?
Candidates Deadlocked in Ohio
3 days ago
THE LATEST
17-POINT EDGE AMONG MILLENNIALS
Clinton Dominates Among Younger Voters
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

In an election between two candidates around 70 years of age, millennials strongly prefer one over the other. Hillary Clinton has a 47%-30% edge among votes 18 to 29. She also leads 46%-36% among voters aged 30 to 44.

Source:
×