The Best Obamacare Speech Obama Never Gave

National Journal
Sophie Novack
See more stories about...
Sophie Novack
Oct. 3, 2013, 12:02 p.m.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4485) }}

Ken­tucky Gov. Steve Be­s­hear, a Demo­crat from a red state, has a simple mes­sage for mem­bers of Con­gress try­ing to get rid of the Af­ford­able Care Act: “Get over it. And get out of the way so I can help my people.”

On day three of the gov­ern­ment shut­down over the health care law, Be­s­hear said he was per­son­ally of­fen­ded by the par­tis­an games­man­ship go­ing on in Wash­ing­ton and de­livered a speech in de­fense of Obama­care worthy of the pres­id­ent him­self.

“[Law­makers] are pour­ing time and money in­to de­fund­ing [the ACA],” he said in a speech and sub­sequent in­ter­view at Na­tion­al Journ­al‘s Count­down to Trans­form­a­tion event Thursday. “It is shame­ful they haven’t in­ves­ted the same time and money in­to try­ing to im­prove health of cit­izens. We need lead­ers who are fo­cused on help­ing people, not gain­ing polit­ic­al power.”

Ken­tucky is a unique ex­ample of a red state ag­gress­ively im­ple­ment­ing Obama’s sig­na­ture health care law. Mitt Rom­ney won more than 60 per­cent of the vote in the state in 2012, and it is con­sidered firmly con­ser­vat­ive. Yet Ken­tucky is the only South­ern state im­ple­ment­ing Medi­caid ex­pan­sion and op­er­at­ing its own state-based ex­change un­der the Af­ford­able Care Act.

Judging by the state’s suc­cess thus far, Ken­tucky could be a key test case for how the law works when fully and en­thu­si­ast­ic­ally im­ple­men­ted as in­ten­ded.

The Ken­tucky Le­gis­lature is split, with a Re­pub­lic­an Sen­ate and Demo­crat­ic House. Be­s­hear is­sued an ex­ec­ut­ive or­der set­ting up the state-based ex­change, an im­ple­ment­a­tion pro­cess dif­fer­ent from those in oth­er states. But Be­s­hear feels strongly about the im­port­ance of the ACA, both for Ken­tucki­ans’ health and qual­ity of life and for busi­ness and eco­nomy of the state.

“Those who say it’s a train wreck, they’re on their own train,” Be­s­hear said. “Be­cause so far, this thing is a huge suc­cess.”

(Kris­tof­fer Tripp­laar)

Cur­rently more than 600,000 people in Ken­tucky — or al­most one in six — are un­in­sured. The law will en­able all of these in­di­vidu­als to re­ceive cov­er­age; 308,000 will be eli­gible for Medi­caid with ex­pan­sion, and the oth­er 332,000 will be able to pur­chase cov­er­age on the ex­changes.

To de­term­ine wheth­er Medi­caid ex­pan­sion was fisc­ally wise for Ken­tucky, Be­s­hear con­trac­ted Price­wa­ter­house­Coopers and the Urb­an Stud­ies In­sti­tute at the Uni­versity of Louis­ville to run the num­bers.

“It took six months,” Be­s­hear said. “They came back and said, Gov­ernor, you can­not af­ford not to do this.”

The groups found that Medi­caid ex­pan­sion would add $15.6 bil­lion in­to the Ken­tucky eco­nomy over the next eight years, cre­ate al­most 17,000 jobs, and pro­tect hos­pit­als from fund­ing cuts.

Ken­tucky began the edu­ca­tion pro­cess about the law months ago, with people help­ing to pro­mote the law at col­lege cam­puses and fairs.

Like the fed­er­al ex­changes and oth­er state ex­changes, the Ken­tucky on­line mar­ket­place ex­per­i­enced its share of glitches. But while oth­ers — the fed­er­al ex­change in par­tic­u­lar — hit ma­jor snags pre­vent­ing people from en­rolling, the Ken­tucky ex­change has already had clear suc­cess.

Ac­cord­ing to Be­s­hear, the Ken­tucky ex­change site got its first con­tact at 12:01 a.m. on Tues­day, the day the ex­changes opened. In the first 48 hours, more than 118,000 in­di­vidu­als vis­ited the site, more than 109,000 ap­plic­ants were pre­screened, more than 13,000 people began the ap­plic­a­tion pro­cess, and nearly 8,300 com­pleted an ap­plic­a­tion. In ad­di­tion, 122 small busi­nesses star­ted their ap­plic­a­tion pro­cess.

Be­s­hear said these num­bers speak for them­selves.

“In Ken­tucky, we can’t af­ford to waste an­oth­er day or an­oth­er life. You don’t have to like the pres­id­ent or like me, it’s not about the pres­id­ent or about me. It’s about you,” Be­s­hear said, adding, “I don’t care if it’s a Re­pub­lic­an idea or a Demo­crat­ic idea, as long as it’s a good idea.”

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
10 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
11 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×