What Happened to ‘Compassionate’ Conservatives?

Veteran Republicans are watching the shutdown in horror. Maybe the best to come from it will be public longing for the return of compassionate conservatism.

DALLAS, TX - JULY 10: Former U.S. President George W. Bush poses with candidate for U.S. Citizenship Raul Guerrero during an immigration naturalization ceremony held at the George W. Bush Presidential Center on July 10, 2013 in Dallas, Texas. Bush delivered keynote remarks during the naturalization ceremony, where 20 candidates took the oath of allegiance and became American citizens. 
National Journal
Jill Lawrence
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Jill Lawrence
Oct. 4, 2013, 2 a.m.

There’s an empty space in the Re­pub­lic­an Party where com­pas­sion­ate con­ser­vat­ism used to be, and an op­por­tun­ity for a pres­id­en­tial pro­spect to step in­to the breach.

The dis­ap­pear­ance of that trade­mark George W. Bush brand from Wash­ing­ton has nev­er been more ap­par­ent. The Re­pub­lic­an House has gone from stalling im­mig­ra­tion re­form and cut­ting food stamps to pre­cip­it­at­ing a gov­ern­ment shut­down by de­mand­ing the re­peal of the health law that is the corner­stone of Pres­id­ent Obama’s leg­acy. The shut­down is threat­en­ing nu­tri­tion pro­grams, can­cer treat­ment, salar­ies, jobs, and much more.

It’s one bad hand among sev­er­al the GOP has dealt it­self.

“We’re not fin­ished com­mit­ting sui­cide here,” said Re­pub­lic­an strategist John Weaver, a vet­er­an of the Mc­Cain and Hunts­man cam­paigns. “We also have the op­por­tun­ity to kill im­mig­ra­tion re­form, and the odds are that we will do that, just to make sure we’re the angry-white-man party.” He says the party may need a George McGov­ern-sized de­feat with a can­did­ate like Ted Cruz be­fore it chooses an­oth­er path.

Mark McKin­non, a former Bush strategist, is hop­ing for a more im­me­di­ate course cor­rec­tion. “Now that the coun­try has seen what com­pas­sion­less con­ser­vat­ives have wrought,” he says, “per­haps the GOP will start to re­gain a hun­ger for com­pas­sion­ate con­ser­vat­ives.”

Re­pub­lic­ans are do­ing noth­ing so far to cut in­to Obama’s ad­vant­age on is­sues like who people trust more to help fam­il­ies and handle health care, and who they blame more for Wash­ing­ton grid­lock. Gal­lup his­tor­ic­al data sug­gest the GOP won’t suf­fer long-term dam­age as a res­ult of the shut­down, but the con­text for this one is dif­fer­ent: It is hap­pen­ing in a drag­ging eco­nomy, it is com­ing amid oth­er un­pop­u­lar stands, and it could be fol­lowed ““ or ac­com­pan­ied ““ by a debt-ceil­ing dis­aster.

Dick Armey, the former House Re­pub­lic­an lead­er, sees de­feat loom­ing on both the PR and policy fronts. “I don’t know that I have ever seen Re­pub­lic­ans gain one inch of ground to­wards their stated ob­ject­ive by pre­cip­it­at­ing a gov­ern­ment shut­down,” he said.

In fact, by link­ing Obama­care to fund­ing the gov­ern­ment, Re­pub­lic­ans may have in­ad­vert­ently raised pub­lic aware­ness of the law and boos­ted traffic on the new in­sur­ance mar­ket­places. Now they are point­ing out glitches due in part to high volume ““ un­der­cut­ting their cus­tom­ary in­sist­ence that Amer­ic­ans don’t want the law. “We shouldn’t be ad­vert­ising the fact that the web­site was over­sub­scribed. That’s not ex­actly a strong talk­ing point for our side,” John Fee­hery, a former House GOP lead­er­ship aide, says with a wry laugh.

Alarm­ist con­ser­vat­ive rhet­or­ic on Obama­care (so­cial­ist, dan­ger­ous, an ex­ist­en­tial eco­nom­ic threat, and a fail­ure be­fore it starts) is an­oth­er po­ten­tial land mine. What are the chances that, as people ex­per­i­ence the law firsthand, they’ll look at that rhet­or­ic and won­der what the heck Re­pub­lic­ans were talk­ing about? “At least 50-50. Prob­ably high­er,” says Ron Haskins, a so­cial policy ex­pert at the Brook­ings In­sti­tu­tion and a former seni­or GOP aide on Cap­it­ol Hill. He says he’s been wor­ried about the dir­ec­tion of his party for months. “Every­day I wake up and it’s something new,” he says.

There are plenty of Re­pub­lic­ans out­side Con­gress who could serve as coun­ter­weights to the harsh im­age fueled by de­vel­op­ments on Cap­it­ol Hill, and even a few in­side. But eld­er states­men like John Mc­Cain and Bob Dole aren’t be­ing heeded, and re­ac­tions by people ey­ing the White House have ranged from ob­lique to MIA.

New Jer­sey Gov. Chris Christie, run­ning for reelec­tion this year and a lead­ing 2016 pro­spect, usu­ally goes the route of “every­one’s to blame.” But he did re­lease a cam­paign ad this week ““ ” Bi­par­tis­an” ““ that could be read as a re­buke of House and Sen­ate con­ser­vat­ives who would rather get nowhere than settle for less than 100 per­cent. “I say what I be­lieve. But I also know that my job is to get things done for the people of the state,” Christie says in the ad. Then, after cit­ing tax cuts, spend­ing cuts, im­prov­ing edu­ca­tion, and re­forms of ten­ure, pen­sions and be­ne­fits, he con­cludes: “Everything we’ve done has been a bi­par­tis­an ac­com­plish­ment. See, I think as long as you stick to your prin­ciples, com­prom­ise isn’t a dirty word.”

Bey­ond Christie, cred­ible counter-mes­sen­gers in­clude Ohio Gov. John Kasich, Nevada Gov. Bri­an San­dov­al, Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder, and former Flor­ida Gov. Jeb Bush. But none of them are likely to step for­ward, in­di­vidu­ally or as a group, un­less and un­til they de­cide to run. And at that point, Fee­hery pre­dicts, the thrust will be tough love for wel­fare and food-stamp re­cip­i­ents and no love for Wash­ing­ton. In oth­er words, the out­siders will run hard against gen­er­al dys­func­tion, but not against the tea party or any oth­er fac­tion. That would be polit­ic­al sui­cide in a primary pro­cess dom­in­ated by grass­roots con­ser­vat­ives.

What We're Following See More »
ANOTHER NUCLEAR OPTION?
Byrd Rule Could Trip Up Health Legislation
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”

Source:
ONE WEEK
Senate Votes To Fund Government
2 days ago
BREAKING
ON TO SENATE
House Passes Spending Bill
2 days ago
BREAKING

The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.

PRESIDENT CALLS MEDICAID FUNDS A “BAILOUT”
Puerto Rico Another Sticking Point in Budget Talks
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."

Source:
POTENTIAL GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN?
Democrats Threaten Spending Bill Over Obamacare
3 days ago
BREAKING

Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login