No one knows exactly what will happen if the United States passes the deadline for raising the debt limit on Oct. 17. That includes the Treasury Department, which calls a possible breach economically “catastrophic.” But that characterization is not stopping 39 percent of Americans from thinking that there’s nothing major to fear.
That fact alone should be terrifying.
A new poll from Pew shows that, while 47 percent of Americans think raising the debt ceiling is “absolutely essential to avoid crisis,” 54 percent of Republicans, 28 percent of Democrats, and 38 percent of independents think the U.S. can go past the deadline “without major problems.” Just 36 percent of Republicans think raising the limit is crucial.
The 39 percent of Americans who think exceeding the deadline would be no big deal are likely very, very wrong. For now, the Treasury has set the deadline at Oct. 17. After that point, the government will just have $30 billion cash-on-hand to meet its obligations. By Nov. 1, those obligations would include $18 billion in Medicare payments, $25 billion in Social Security payments, and $12 billion in military payments.
Failing to make those payments alone sounds really, really bad. But this wouldn’t just impact the people reliant on government money. Per BloombergBusinessWeek:
Failure by the world’s largest borrower to pay its debt — unprecedented in modern history — will devastate stock markets from Brazil to Zurich, halt a $5 trillion lending mechanism for investors who rely on Treasuries, blow up borrowing costs for billions of people and companies, ravage the dollar, and throw the U.S. and world economies into a recession that probably would become a depression. Among the dozens of money managers, economists, bankers, traders, and former government officials interviewed for this story, few view a U.S. default as anything but a financial apocalypse.
Another way of looking at the impact on the global economy, as they put it, is as an immediate economic crisis that’s, at a minimum, way larger than anything faced in the fall of 2008.
But as long as a sizable number of Americans — and a majority of Republicans — view default as something less than toxic, the possibility of default remains.
What We're Following See More »
Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”
“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.