War is often described as hours of tedium punctuated by moments of terror. It’s an apt description of protecting the Capitol during the shutdown, too.
This week, cops patrol hallways, statuaries, and rotundas that are completely devoid of people (“Welcome to my hall of boredom!” exclaims one officer walking toward the Senate chamber). Last week, however, they scrambled to respond after gunshots left one woman dead and the entire complex on lockdown. Either way, it’s not a job people want to do without collecting a paycheck — or at least knowing when they’re going to get one.
Across the country, there are about 2 million federal workers who could miss paychecks while the government is shut down. They are FEMA workers, park rangers, and Pentagon personnel, to name just a few. But there’s one group who are forced to spend their days protecting the very lawmakers who stopped the paychecks: the Capitol Police.
They are almost guaranteed to get back pay — especially after President Obama said he would support a bill passed unanimously in the House of Representatives that promised to pay the nearly 800,000 people furloughed — but have to wait until the government reopens for business. No one knows when that will be.
“There can’t be an end for something until there’s a beginning,” said one officer standing outside the Capitol.
The force will be paid for its work in September by Oct. 17, but if the shutdown continues for long after that, it’s unclear the next time they will be paid. Missing a pay period, even for a group of people with a starting salary of about $56,000 (among the higher base salaries for area officers, according to a 2012 Government Accountability Office report), isn’t an easy thing.
Some officers’ spouses are also federal employees not getting paychecks until the shutdown ends. Some are calling banks to work out mortgage payments, while others are relying on savings if the shutdown drags on.
“It’s like the guys who come back from war missing a leg,” said one officer. “You can either commit suicide or go on. There’s just nothing we can do.”
Lawmakers on the Hill have acknowledged their sacrifice. “Today and every day that the federal government remains closed for business, these Capitol Police officers — and tens of thousands of other public servants, including many law-enforcement officials — are working without pay,” said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., who once worked on the force.
Even Senate Chaplain Barry Black, who has lately injected himself into the shutdown debate by praying for God to do things like “save us from the madness,” highlighted the irony. The day after a woman drove at a Capitol grounds barricade, Black began the Senate session by intoning, “May we go beyond applause in expressing our gratitude but make decisions that will ensure their timely and fair compensation.”
And it’s not just in front of the bright lights and cameras that members profess their support. It’s always been something of a trope for lawmakers to get chummy with the force, but the shutdown has kicked it up a notch. “It’s extra right now,” one officer noted. “They’re really hamming it up.”
It doesn’t always come across as genuine.
“They don’t care,” an officer said about the members of Congress who have offered public support. “What we need to do is freeze their bank accounts and their wives’ bank accounts. That’d get them to act.”
Thursday, the day the Capitol was on lockdown and shots rang through the air, was particularly difficult. “The general consensus is that eventually we’ll get paid; at the end of the day it’s just delayed. But there’s real anger at people being disrespectful at the police who are protecting them from imminent harm,” said one officer.
But even that officer noted that a number of members of Congress, even those he’s never spoken with, have “apologized profusely” to him. And he believes they are sincere.
“If Halloween comes and goes and there’s no candy on the table, people are going to freak,” an officer said, “and no one I’ve talked to can handle it if it goes like last time.”
The last government shutdown went on for 26 days.
What We're Following See More »
In light of his recent confessions, the speakership of Dennis Hastert is being judged far more harshly. The New York Times' Carl Hulse notes that in hindsight, Hastert now "fares poorly" on a number of fronts, from his handling of the Mark Foley page scandal to "an explosion" of earmarks to the weakening of committee chairmen. "Even his namesake Hastert rule—the informal standard that no legislation should be brought to a vote without the support of a majority of the majority — has come to be seen as a structural barrier to compromise."
Even if "[t]he Republican presidential nomination may be in his sights ... Trump has so far ignored vital preparations needed for a quick and effective transition to the general election. The New York businessman has collected little information about tens of millions of voters he needs to turn out in the fall. He's sent few people to battleground states compared with likely Democratic rival Hillary Clinton, accumulated little if any research on her, and taken no steps to build a network capable of raising the roughly $1 billion needed to run a modern-day general election campaign."
Rep. Dave Young can't even refuse his own paycheck. The Iowa Republican is trying to make a point that if Congress can't pass a budget (it's already missed the April 15 deadline) then it shouldn't be paid. But, he's been informed, the 27th Amendment prohibits him from refusing his own pay. "Young’s efforts to dock his own pay, however, are duck soup compared to his larger goal: docking the pay of every lawmaker when Congress drops the budget ball." His bill to stiff his colleagues has only mustered the support of three of them. Another bill, sponsored by Rep. Jim Cooper (D-TN), has about three dozen co-sponsors.
Sixty miles away, in Sandusky, Ohio. "We're pretty bitter about that," said Harmeet Dhillon, vice chairwoman of the California Republican Party. "It sucks to be California, we're like the ugly stepchild. They need us for our cash and our donors, they don't need us for anything else."
Anyone looking forward to seeing some boldfaced names on the client list of the late Deborah Jeane Palfrey, the "DC Madam," will have to wait a little longer. "The Supreme Court announced Monday it would not intervene to allow" the release of her phone records, "despite one of her former attorneys claiming the records are “very relevant” to the presidential election. Though he has repeatedly threatened to release the records if courts do not modify a 2007 restraining order, Montgomery Blair Sibley tells U.S. News he’s not quite sure what he now will do."