War is often described as hours of tedium punctuated by moments of terror. It’s an apt description of protecting the Capitol during the shutdown, too.
This week, cops patrol hallways, statuaries, and rotundas that are completely devoid of people (“Welcome to my hall of boredom!” exclaims one officer walking toward the Senate chamber). Last week, however, they scrambled to respond after gunshots left one woman dead and the entire complex on lockdown. Either way, it’s not a job people want to do without collecting a paycheck — or at least knowing when they’re going to get one.
Across the country, there are about 2 million federal workers who could miss paychecks while the government is shut down. They are FEMA workers, park rangers, and Pentagon personnel, to name just a few. But there’s one group who are forced to spend their days protecting the very lawmakers who stopped the paychecks: the Capitol Police.
They are almost guaranteed to get back pay — especially after President Obama said he would support a bill passed unanimously in the House of Representatives that promised to pay the nearly 800,000 people furloughed — but have to wait until the government reopens for business. No one knows when that will be.
“There can’t be an end for something until there’s a beginning,” said one officer standing outside the Capitol.
The force will be paid for its work in September by Oct. 17, but if the shutdown continues for long after that, it’s unclear the next time they will be paid. Missing a pay period, even for a group of people with a starting salary of about $56,000 (among the higher base salaries for area officers, according to a 2012 Government Accountability Office report), isn’t an easy thing.
Some officers’ spouses are also federal employees not getting paychecks until the shutdown ends. Some are calling banks to work out mortgage payments, while others are relying on savings if the shutdown drags on.
“It’s like the guys who come back from war missing a leg,” said one officer. “You can either commit suicide or go on. There’s just nothing we can do.”
Lawmakers on the Hill have acknowledged their sacrifice. “Today and every day that the federal government remains closed for business, these Capitol Police officers — and tens of thousands of other public servants, including many law-enforcement officials — are working without pay,” said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., who once worked on the force.
Even Senate Chaplain Barry Black, who has lately injected himself into the shutdown debate by praying for God to do things like “save us from the madness,” highlighted the irony. The day after a woman drove at a Capitol grounds barricade, Black began the Senate session by intoning, “May we go beyond applause in expressing our gratitude but make decisions that will ensure their timely and fair compensation.”
And it’s not just in front of the bright lights and cameras that members profess their support. It’s always been something of a trope for lawmakers to get chummy with the force, but the shutdown has kicked it up a notch. “It’s extra right now,” one officer noted. “They’re really hamming it up.”
It doesn’t always come across as genuine.
“They don’t care,” an officer said about the members of Congress who have offered public support. “What we need to do is freeze their bank accounts and their wives’ bank accounts. That’d get them to act.”
Thursday, the day the Capitol was on lockdown and shots rang through the air, was particularly difficult. “The general consensus is that eventually we’ll get paid; at the end of the day it’s just delayed. But there’s real anger at people being disrespectful at the police who are protecting them from imminent harm,” said one officer.
But even that officer noted that a number of members of Congress, even those he’s never spoken with, have “apologized profusely” to him. And he believes they are sincere.
“If Halloween comes and goes and there’s no candy on the table, people are going to freak,” an officer said, “and no one I’ve talked to can handle it if it goes like last time.”
The last government shutdown went on for 26 days.
What We're Following See More »
Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:
- Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
- Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
- They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
- One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”
Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”
The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”
At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”