Iowa and New Hampshire are the opening battlegrounds of presidential nominating contests. This year, they have something else in common: dysfunction surrounding the state-level Republican Party.
— In Iowa, the state party is led by Ron Paul acolytes, who have clashed with the more-pragmatic wing of the party, headed by Gov. Terry Branstad. Two county GOP chairs have called for party chair A.J. Spiker‘s resignation, as has longtime Branstad ally David Kochel. Branstad himself has swatted at the state GOP repeatedly, and some Republicans are planning an effort to install new party leaders next year. In New Hampshire, GOP chairwoman Jennifer Horn is already losing her executive director, who started six months ago.
— At the same time, Republicans have struggled to land quality candidates in winnable races in both states. In Iowa, where President Obama‘s approval rating is weak, the GOP has a crowded but unremarkable group of candidates. There’s a growing likelihood the nominee will be determined by a convention of activists. In New Hampshire, no Republican has stepped forward to challenge Gov. Maggie Hassan, while Sen. Jeanne Shaheen‘s little-known challenger doesn’t seem ready for primetime. A long line of qualified Republican candidates have passed on both Granite State races.
— Problems within a state party can cause major headaches during presidential races, as Republicans learned in Nevada in 2012. Lingering problems within these state parties means the traditional powerbrokers will have less influence over the nominating fights, boosting the odds for a grassroots-powered underdog, like Rand Paul.
Over the next few years, presidential contenders will find reasons to visit Iowa and New Hampshire. At the same time, their aides will keep a wary eye on the drama within the state parties.
What We're Following See More »
Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”
“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.