False Purists and Their False Equivalence Dodge

Rarely are both sides equally wrong. Rarer still is one side 100 percent right.

From left to right: House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV), Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-OH), and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) speak to the media at the White House on November 16, 2012.
National Journal
Ron Fournier
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Ron Fournier
Oct. 9, 2013, 7:22 a.m.

“It’s a struggle with no her­oes,” de­clared The As­so­ci­ated Press in re­port­ing its poll on Amer­ic­ans’ at­ti­tudes to­ward the par­tial gov­ern­ment shut­down. The coun­try is hold­ing Re­pub­lic­ans primar­ily re­spons­ible, the AP-GfK sur­vey shows, “but the situ­ation is flu­id nine days in­to the shut­down and there’s plenty of dis­dain to go around.”

In oth­er words, it is a pox on both houses.

Par­tis­ans des­pise pox-on-both-houses stor­ies. On the right and left, from the White House to the House speak­er’s of­fice, politi­cians spend their time, en­ergy, and cred­ib­il­ity on nar­row-minded quests to de­fend their in­fal­lib­il­ity. One way they do it is to ac­cuse journ­al­ists of “false equi­val­ence.”

A false equi­val­ence is to de­scribe a situ­ation as hav­ing lo­gic­al and ap­par­ent equi­val­ence when in fact there is none. For ex­ample, I be­lieve it would be false equi­val­ence to say Re­pub­lic­ans and Demo­crats are equally to blame for the gov­ern­ment shut­down and the pos­sib­il­ity of a debt de­fault. Re­pub­lic­ans en­gin­eered the shut­down to protest a three-year-old health care law, know­ing their de­fund-or-delay de­mands were un­at­tain­able. False equi­val­ence is a form of in­tel­lec­tu­al lazi­ness.

There is no false equi­val­ence in the AP story or the pub­lic at­ti­tudes it re­flects — 62 per­cent blame Re­pub­lic­ans for the show­down. About half said Obama or Demo­crats in Con­gress bear much re­spons­ib­il­ity. Noth­ing equal about it.

At the same time, voters don’t ab­solve the Demo­crat­ic ma­jor­ity in the Sen­ate or Pres­id­ent Obama him­self. Only 37 per­cent ap­prove of the way the pres­id­ent is hand­ling his job, an an­em­ic num­ber. Demo­crat­ic Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id has a fa­vor­ab­il­ity rat­ing of just 18 per­cent, the same as House Speak­er John Boehner. The pres­id­ent was un­able or un­will­ing to gain GOP sup­port for Obama­care in 2010, he failed over the last three years to sell the pub­lic on the law’s many mer­its, and his peev­ish rhet­or­ic this month has at times been less than pres­id­en­tial. In oth­er words, Obama isn’t per­fect.

“Some­body needs to jerk those guys to­geth­er and get a solu­tion, in­stead of just say­ing ‘no,’” in­de­pend­ent voter Martha Blair told AP. “It’s just so frus­trat­ing.”

When I tweeted this story with a pox-on-all-houses teas­er, the re­sponse was pre­dict­able. Lib­er­al par­tis­ans clutched their cliché. False equi­val­ence! A typ­ic­al re­sponse (from a reg­u­lar and thought­ful lib­er­al read­er):

“@jack­thec­at11: @AP Way to find a poll that looks bad for Obama to bal­ance GOP’s cata­stroph­ic drop. You’re pretty dug in on this false equiv.”

That is wrong. The story and poll as­sess blame un­equally, which is the ex­act op­pos­ite of false equi­val­ence. What the poll re­flects is the abil­ity of voters to look bey­ond na­ked ideo­logy and de­mand bet­ter of their lead­ers — to hold them ac­count­able fairly, if not equally, re­gard­less of party or slice of blame. As I wrote the day be­fore the shut­down began, both parties are in danger of los­ing the fu­ture if they aren’t ac­count­able today.

Some­where along the line, par­tis­ans star­ted con­flat­ing false equi­val­ence with any thought that chal­lenges their ri­gid, ab­so­lut­ist points of view. In polit­ics and in every­day life, rarely are both sides equally wrong. Rarer still is one side 100 per­cent right. In this era of zero-sum gain polit­ics, the lo­gic­al fal­lacy more pro­nounced than false equi­val­ence is false pur­ity. It is in­tel­lec­tu­ally dis­hon­est.

What We're Following See More »
ISIS INVOLVED
Niger Attack Possible Terrorist Set-Up
10 hours ago
THE LATEST

"An emerging theory among U.S. military investigators is that the Army Special Forces soldiers ambushed in Niger were set up by terrorists, who were tipped off in advance about a meeting in a village sympathetic to local ISIS affiliates...The group of American Green Berets and support soldiers had requested a meeting with elders of a village that was seen as supportive of the Islamic State, and they attended the meeting at around 11 a.m. local time Oct. 4...Such meetings are a routine part of the Green Beret mission, but it wasn't clear whether this meeting was part of the unit's plan."

Source:
TRUMP’S COMMENTS AT ISSUE
Bergdahl’s Sentencing Delayed Until Wednesday
10 hours ago
THE LATEST

"The long-awaited sentencing of Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl was delayed Monday after a legal battle erupted over the word 'but' in President Donald Trump's most recent remarks about the case. Bergdahl's defense team argued that their client could not get a fair shake from the court because Trump, during a Rose Garden appearance on Oct. 16, at first said he couldn't talk about the case and then added: 'But I think people have heard my comments in the past.'" Trump has called him a traitor and suggested he should be executed.

Source:
PROBE CAME FROM INQUIRY INTO MANAFORT’S FINANCES
Mueller Investigating Tony Podesta and His Firm
19 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Tony Podesta and the Podesta Group are now the subjects of a federal investigation being led by Special Counsel Robert Mueller, three sources with knowledge of the matter told NBC News. The probe of Podesta and his Democratic-leaning lobbying firm grew out of Mueller's inquiry into the finances of former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort."

Source:
SCHEDULED FOR TUESDAY
House Intel Will Interview Trump Digital Director
21 hours ago
THE LATEST

"President Donald Trump’s campaign digital director, Brad Parscale, will be interviewed Tuesday by the House Intelligence Committee, his first appearance before any of the panels examining the issue of Russian interference in the 2016 election. Mr. Parscale confirmed his scheduled appearance. The Senate committees also probing interference haven’t scheduled time with Mr. Parscale, he said, declining to comment further."

Source:
CONGRESS MAY HAVE DIFFERENT IDEAS
Trump Promises No Changes to 401(k) Plan
21 hours ago
THE LATEST
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login