When it comes to deficit reduction, Americans increasingly favor spending cuts over tax increases. But their greater openness carries a familiar warning: Reduce spending, but don’t touch our favored entitlement programs.
Those findings from the United Technologies/National Journal Congressional Connection Poll indicate the public has cooled on further tax increases after this year’s fiscal-cliff agreement to raise rates on individuals making $400,000 and families making $450,000. That’s positive news for Republicans, who support deficit-reduction packages that skew heavily toward spending cuts.
A plurality of adults, 43 percent, support a deficit-reduction package that includes two-thirds spending cuts and one-third tax increases. Comparatively, only 12 percent said they preferred a plan with the reverse — two-thirds tax increases and one-third spending cuts. Thirty-one percent said they want a debt plan to include equal parts cuts and tax hikes,
That’s a 12-point swing from a poll taken last year. Then, a proposal to raise taxes and cut spending had as much support as one that emphasized lowering spending — both received 38 percent. A plan that favored tax increases drew 16 percent support last year — 4 percent higher than now.
A growing reluctance to raise taxes was also evident with regard to specific tax deductions. In all four categories mentioned to respondents — home mortgages, state and local taxes, charitable donations, and employee health insurance exemptions — people were less inclined to reduce the deductions than last year. The shift was largest for the charitable deduction: 46 percent said lawmakers should not reduce the deduction at all, 9 points higher than the 37 percent who said so last year.
The tax-related poll results aren’t all rosy for the GOP. Overall, most people supported additional tax revenue through reduced deductions: 30 percent of adults want the charitable deduction lowered for everyone, and 19 percent of them want it reduced for those making more than $250,000. Combined, that’s still larger than the share of adults who want to keep the tax exemption as it is.
The results on entitlement programs present a familiar dilemma: The public wants to reduce the debt, but the programs that are the biggest drivers of the long-term deficit are also the ones they are least willing to cut. On Social Security, 76 percent of poll respondents say they don’t want spending to be cut at all; just 21 percent say they want spending on the program to be reduced a lot or some. It’s a similar story with Medicare: 81 percent oppose any cuts to it, while only 18 percent back reductions of any kind.
And when asked what they fear most about a deficit-reduction plan, a plurality of adults, 35 percent, said that it “would cut too much from government programs like Medicare and Social Security.”
There is, however, one program the public is suddenly in favor of cutting: food stamps. More than half of adults, 56 percent, support some or a lot of cuts to the program — 42 percent say they don’t want any cuts at all. That’s a significant change since last February, when a National Journal poll found more people, 51 percent, said they didn’t want to touch the food-stamp program. Support now is highest among whites, 61 percent of whom want to cut the program, including 20 percent who say they want deep cuts.
The survey suggests that a House Republican vote in September to cut billions in food-stamp funding, action critics regarded at the time as politically harmful, won’t draw a backlash from voters.
A chunk of adults expressed concern that a deficit-reduction plan would either raise taxes too much or cut spending too little. The poll found 25 percent of people said they fear it would “raise taxes on people like you.” Seventeen percent said they worried such a plan wouldn’t reach its target for deficit reduction, while 14 percent are anxious it would “allow for too much federal spending in the next few years.”
The current installment of the United Technologies/National Journal Congressional Connection Poll was conducted Oct. 3-6 by Princeton Survey Research Associates International. The poll surveyed 1,000 adults, half via cell phone, and carries a margin of error of plus or minus 3.7 percentage points.
What We're Following See More »
Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.
Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”
Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."
In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-expected primary battle behind her, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (D) is no longer going on the air in upcoming primary states. “Team Clinton hasn’t spent a single cent in … California, Indiana, Kentucky, Oregon and West Virginia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “campaign has spent a little more than $1 million in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone backer in the Senate, said the candidate should end his presidential campaign if he’s losing to Hillary Clinton after the primary season concludes in June, breaking sharply with the candidate who is vowing to take his insurgent bid to the party convention in Philadelphia.”