When it comes to deficit reduction, Americans increasingly favor spending cuts over tax increases. But their greater openness carries a familiar warning: Reduce spending, but don’t touch our favored entitlement programs.
Those findings from the United Technologies/National Journal Congressional Connection Poll indicate the public has cooled on further tax increases after this year’s fiscal-cliff agreement to raise rates on individuals making $400,000 and families making $450,000. That’s positive news for Republicans, who support deficit-reduction packages that skew heavily toward spending cuts.
A plurality of adults, 43 percent, support a deficit-reduction package that includes two-thirds spending cuts and one-third tax increases. Comparatively, only 12 percent said they preferred a plan with the reverse — two-thirds tax increases and one-third spending cuts. Thirty-one percent said they want a debt plan to include equal parts cuts and tax hikes,
That’s a 12-point swing from a poll taken last year. Then, a proposal to raise taxes and cut spending had as much support as one that emphasized lowering spending — both received 38 percent. A plan that favored tax increases drew 16 percent support last year — 4 percent higher than now.
A growing reluctance to raise taxes was also evident with regard to specific tax deductions. In all four categories mentioned to respondents — home mortgages, state and local taxes, charitable donations, and employee health insurance exemptions — people were less inclined to reduce the deductions than last year. The shift was largest for the charitable deduction: 46 percent said lawmakers should not reduce the deduction at all, 9 points higher than the 37 percent who said so last year.
The tax-related poll results aren’t all rosy for the GOP. Overall, most people supported additional tax revenue through reduced deductions: 30 percent of adults want the charitable deduction lowered for everyone, and 19 percent of them want it reduced for those making more than $250,000. Combined, that’s still larger than the share of adults who want to keep the tax exemption as it is.
The results on entitlement programs present a familiar dilemma: The public wants to reduce the debt, but the programs that are the biggest drivers of the long-term deficit are also the ones they are least willing to cut. On Social Security, 76 percent of poll respondents say they don’t want spending to be cut at all; just 21 percent say they want spending on the program to be reduced a lot or some. It’s a similar story with Medicare: 81 percent oppose any cuts to it, while only 18 percent back reductions of any kind.
And when asked what they fear most about a deficit-reduction plan, a plurality of adults, 35 percent, said that it “would cut too much from government programs like Medicare and Social Security.”
There is, however, one program the public is suddenly in favor of cutting: food stamps. More than half of adults, 56 percent, support some or a lot of cuts to the program — 42 percent say they don’t want any cuts at all. That’s a significant change since last February, when a National Journal poll found more people, 51 percent, said they didn’t want to touch the food-stamp program. Support now is highest among whites, 61 percent of whom want to cut the program, including 20 percent who say they want deep cuts.
The survey suggests that a House Republican vote in September to cut billions in food-stamp funding, action critics regarded at the time as politically harmful, won’t draw a backlash from voters.
A chunk of adults expressed concern that a deficit-reduction plan would either raise taxes too much or cut spending too little. The poll found 25 percent of people said they fear it would “raise taxes on people like you.” Seventeen percent said they worried such a plan wouldn’t reach its target for deficit reduction, while 14 percent are anxious it would “allow for too much federal spending in the next few years.”
The current installment of the United Technologies/National Journal Congressional Connection Poll was conducted Oct. 3-6 by Princeton Survey Research Associates International. The poll surveyed 1,000 adults, half via cell phone, and carries a margin of error of plus or minus 3.7 percentage points.
- 1 Split-Ticket Voting Could Complicate Party Turnout Efforts
- 2 Why Trump Isn’t Moving the Map
- 3 The Story of 2016: Republicans Feeling “Betrayed” by Their Leaders
- 4 Corrine Brown, Under Indictment, Becomes Fifth House Incumbent to Fall
- 5 Brown Becomes Fifth House Incumbent to Fall; Wasserman Schultz Survives Primary Challenge
What We're Following See More »
Following their meeting, President Enrique Peña Nieto of Mexico and Republican nominee for president, Donald Trump, briefly addressed the media, with Peña Nieto subtly rebuking Trump's rhetoric. While he spoke respectfully about Trump, Peña Nieto did not back down, saying that free trade has proved effective and that illegal immigration into America from the south has decreased over the last ten years while the flow of people and drugs into Mexico has increased. Additionally, he stressed that Mexicans in America are "honest" and "deserve respect." Trump responded, calling some Mexicans "tremendous people" while saying others are "beyond reproach." Trump laid out five important issues, including the end of illegal immigration and the ability for either country to build a wall or border. However, Trump said he did not discuss who would pay for the wall.
A divided Supreme Court "refused Wednesday to reinstate North Carolina’s voter identification requirement and keep just 10 days of early in-person voting. The court rejected a request by Gov. Pat McCrory and other state officials to delay a lower court ruling that found the state law was tainted by racial discrimination."
"Police say a woman walked into U.S. Rep. Danny Davis' office on Chicago's West Side, drank out of a bottle of hand sanitizer, poured the sanitizer over herself and set herself on fire with a lighter." The Democrat wasn't in the office at the time.
"The Department of Health and Human Services on Wednesday awarded 44 states, four tribes and the District of Columbia a combined $53 million in grants to expand access to treatment for opioid use disorders and ultimately aimed at reducing the number of opioid-related deaths." But HHS Secretary Sylvia Burwell and drug czar Michael Botticelli both called on Congress to approve the $1.1 billion Obama has requested to fight the opioid crisis.