U.S. Gas Exports Would Be a Global Boon, Foreign Energy Leaders Say

WASHINGTON - MAY 06: House Energy and Commerce Committee's Commerce, Trade, and Consumer Protection Subcommittee Chairman Bobby Rush (D-IL) (L) listens to ranking member Rep. Ed Whitfield (R-KY) question witnesses during a hearing about 'The Motor Vehicle Safety Act.' May 6, 2010 in Washington, DC. In the wake of Toyota recalling more than 8 million cars worldwide, Congress is pushing the auto industry to meet new safety standards and impose tougher penalties on car companies that fail to quickly report safety defects to the government. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
National Journal
Clare Foran
Oct. 10, 2013, 1:56 p.m.

Del­eg­ates from 10 coun­tries — in­clud­ing Hun­gary, Haiti, In­dia, Ja­pan, and Thai­l­and — ar­gued for in­creased U.S. ex­ports of li­que­fied nat­ur­al gas to in­crease glob­al en­ergy se­cur­ity and strengthen dip­lo­mat­ic ties dur­ing a Thursday for­um con­vened by the House En­ergy and Com­merce Sub­com­mit­tee on En­ergy and Power.

Del­eg­ates from Hun­gary and the Czech Re­pub­lic said ex­pan­ded LNG ex­ports would bring U.S. gas in­to com­pet­i­tion with Rus­sia, the ma­jor sup­pli­er of oil and gas in east­ern Europe. In­creased com­pet­i­tion, they ar­gued, would drive down gas prices to the be­ne­fit of con­sumers.

“We need to have more com­pet­i­tion to have af­ford­able en­ergy prices,” said An­ita Orb­an, am­bas­sad­or-at-large for en­ergy se­cur­ity for the Hun­gari­an Min­istry of For­eign Af­fairs.

Rep­res­ent­at­ives from Ja­pan and Singa­pore also called for in­creased U.S. LNG ex­ports, say­ing it would help di­ver­si­fy do­mest­ic en­ergy mar­kets.

“We are a small is­land state with no en­ergy en­dow­ments of our own,” said Ashok Ku­mar Mir­puri, Singa­pore’s am­bas­sad­or to the U.S.

Ac­cord­ing to Mir­puri, Singa­pore gets most of its nat­ur­al gas from Malay­sia and In­done­sia but hopes to ex­pand the num­ber of coun­tries it buys from so as not to be­come overly de­pend­ent on any one state.

“We’ve in­ves­ted in an LNG ter­min­al in May of this year,” he said, adding: “We’re mak­ing the ne­ces­sary in­vest­ments in or­der to have the LNG sup­ply to di­ver­si­fy our en­ergy needs.”

The second ar­gu­ment ad­vanced by the del­eg­ates in fa­vor of ex­pan­ded U.S. LNG ex­port activ­ity was that it would im­prove U.S. dip­lo­mat­ic re­la­tions abroad.

Taranjit Singh Sandhu, In­dia’s deputy chief of mis­sion, told sub­com­mit­tee mem­bers that up­ping ex­ports would cre­ate “a strong and mu­tu­ally re­ward­ing en­ergy part­ner­ship and fur­ther our ties to the be­ne­fit of both our coun­tries.”

“It’s not only about li­que­fied nat­ur­al gas,” ad­ded Ahn Ho-Young, South Korea’s am­bas­sad­or to the United States. “It would open the pos­sib­il­ity of strength­en­ing re­la­tions between Korea and the U.S. in many dif­fer­ent areas.”

House En­ergy and Com­merce Com­mit­tee Chair­man Fred Up­ton, R-Mich., agreed that in­creased LNG ex­ports would be a boon to the U.S. for both eco­nom­ic and dip­lo­mat­ic reas­ons.

“It is my hope that we can use this op­por­tun­ity to bet­ter ex­plore how mov­ing for­ward with Amer­ic­an en­ergy ex­ports can help strengthen our ties with for­eign na­tions while at the same time provid­ing mu­tu­al be­ne­fits do­mest­ic­ally here in the U.S. with ad­ded job cre­ation and con­tin­ued en­ergy self-suf­fi­ciency,” Up­ton said in his open­ing re­marks.

En­ergy and Power Sub­com­mit­tee Chair­man Ed Whit­field, R-Ky., ac­know­ledged that some in­terest groups op­pose ac­cel­er­at­ing ap­prov­al for U.S. LNG ex­port ter­min­als, but he took the po­s­i­tion that a move to boost ex­ports would be in the U.S. in­terest.

“In polit­ics, there are two sides, and there are groups that want the U.S. to move slowly in ex­port­ing gas to oth­er coun­tries… [but] we think we can be­ne­fit from it,” Whit­field said.

The for­um saw bi­par­tis­an sup­port for the is­sue, with Rep. Jerry McNer­ney, D-Cal­if., af­firm­ing sup­port for ac­cel­er­ated ex­port per­mit­ting. “I think we should move for­ward with de­vel­op­ing nat­ur­al gas ex­ports,” he said.

McNer­ney did raise the con­cern, however, that if the U.S dis­trib­utes in­creased stores of nat­ur­al gas abroad it may not know wheth­er the re­cip­i­ent na­tions have the prop­er in­fra­struc­ture to ab­sorb the gas without gen­er­at­ing pipeline spills or oth­er forms of pol­lu­tion.

“The one cau­tion is that we live in an area where we can no longer dump car­bon and oth­er green­house gases with com­plete aban­don,” McNer­ney said.

The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion has so far ap­proved four LNG ex­port ter­min­als to ship nat­ur­al gas abroad, with three ter­min­als ap­proved this year.

What We're Following See More »
“CLINTON MUST BECOME THE NEXT PRESIDENT”
Bernie Sanders Seeks to Unite the Party
9 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Instead of his usual stump speech, Bernie Sanders tonight threw his support behind Hillary Clinton, providing a clear contrast between Clinton and GOP nominee Donald Trump on the many issues he used to discuss in his campaign stump speeches. Sanders spoke glowingly about the presumptive Democratic nominee, lauding her work as first lady and as a strong advocate for women and the poor. “We need leadership in this country which will improve the lives of working families, the children, the elderly, the sick and the poor,” he said. “Hillary Clinton will make a great president, and I am proud to stand with her tonight."

“MUST NEVER BE PRESIDENT”
Elizabeth Warren Goes After Donald Trump
9 hours ago
THE DETAILS

In a stark contrast from Michelle Obama's uplifting speech, Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren spoke about the rigged system plaguing Americans before launching into a full-throated rebuke of GOP nominee Donald Trump. Trump is "a man who has never sacrificed anything for anyone," she claimed, before saying he "must never be president of the United States." She called him divisive and selfish, and said the American people won't accept his "hate-filled America." In addition to Trump, Warren went after the Republican Party as a whole. "To Republicans in Congress who said no, this November the American people are coming for you," she said.

FLOTUS OFFERS STRONG ENDORSEMENT OF CLINTON
Michelle Obama: “I Trust” Hillary Clinton
10 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"In this election, and every election, it's about who will have the power to shape our children for the next four or eight years of their lives," Michelle Obama said. "There is only one person who I trust with that responsibility … and that is our friend Hillary Clinton." In a personal and emotional speech, Michelle Obama spoke about the effect that angry oppositional rhetoric had on her children and how she chose to raise them. "When they go low, we go high," Obama said she told her children about dealing with bullies. Obama stayed mostly positive, but still offered a firm rebuke of Donald Trump, despite never once uttering his name. "The issues a president faces cannot be boiled down to 140 characters," she said.

SANDERS BACKER CONFRONTS STUBBORN SANDERS SUPPORTERS
Sarah Silverman to Bernie or Bust: “You’re Being Ridiculous”
11 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Many Bernie Sanders delegates have spent much of the first day of the Democratic National Convention resisting unity, booing at mentions of Hillary Clinton and often chanting "Bernie! Bernie!" Well, one of the most outspoken Bernie Sanders supporters just told them to take a seat. "To the Bernie-or-bust people: You're being ridiculous," said comedian Sarah Silverman in a brief appearance at the Convention, minutes after saying that she would proudly support Hillary Clinton for president.

‘INEXCUSABLE REMARKS’
DNC Formally Apologizes to Bernie Sanders
15 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Democratic National Committee issued a formal apology to Bernie Sanders today, after leaked emails showed staffers trying to sabotage his presidential bid. "On behalf of everyone at the DNC, we want to offer a deep and sincere apology to Senator Sanders, his supporters, and the entire Democratic Party for the inexcusable remarks made over email," DNC officials said in the statement. "These comments do not reflect the values of the DNC or our steadfast commitment to neutrality during the nominating process. The DNC does not—and will not—tolerate disrespectful language exhibited toward our candidates."

Source:
×