Republicans Criticize Possible Turkey-China Antimissile Deal

Rachel Oswald, Global Security Newswire
See more stories about...
Rachel Oswald, Global Security Newswire
Oct. 11, 2013, 9:02 a.m.

WASH­ING­TON — Re­pub­lic­an law­makers in both cham­bers are ur­ging the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion to use dip­lo­mat­ic and mil­it­ary levers to pres­sure Tur­key in­to abandon­ing its plans to pur­chase a long-range mis­sile-de­fense sys­tem from China.

Crit­ics of the pos­sible deal, an­nounced last month, are con­cerned it could en­danger the in­teg­rity of NATO’s evolving bal­list­ic mis­sile shield as China might seek to use the sys­tem it sells to Tur­key to il­li­citly ex­tract data from the al­li­ance’s inter-con­nec­ted mis­sile de­fense net­work. Be­cause of this fear, op­pon­ents ar­gue Ank­ara should not be per­mit­ted to con­nect the FD-2000 an­ti­mis­sile sys­tem it is in­ter­ested in pur­chas­ing from a Chinese com­pany with the broad­er al­li­ance mis­sile shield. There are also doubts that the Chinese tech­no­logy could be made com­pat­ible with oth­er NATO an­ti­mis­sile as­sets.

“We strongly urge you to ex­ert all avail­able dip­lo­mat­ic pres­sure to pre­vent Turk­ish pro­cure­ment of a [China Pre­ci­sion Mil­it­ary Im­port and Ex­port Corp.] mis­sile de­fense sys­tem and en­sure NATO will nev­er al­low such a sys­tem to be in­teg­rated in­to NATO’s se­cur­ity ar­chi­tec­ture,” say a group of GOP sen­at­ors in a let­ter draf­ted for sub­mis­sion, pos­sibly on Fri­day, to Sec­ret­ary of State John Kerry and De­fense Sec­ret­ary Chuck Hagel.

The state-owned CP­MIEC com­pany was sanc­tioned by the U.S. gov­ern­ment earli­er this year for vi­ol­at­ing the 2006 Ir­an, North Korea and Syr­ia Non­pro­lif­er­a­tion Act.

As of press time, the let­ter had been signed by Sen­at­ors Mark Kirk (R-Ill.), John Cornyn (R-Texas), Ro­ger Wick­er (R-Miss.), John Bar­rasso (R-Wyo.), John Booz­man (R-Ark.) and James In­hofe (R-Okla.). A copy of it was provided to Glob­al Se­cur­ity News­wire.

Mem­bers of the House also are con­cerned about the se­cur­ity rami­fic­a­tions of the pos­sible weapons deal.

House Armed Ser­vices Stra­tegic Forces Sub­com­mit­tee Chair­man Mike Ro­gers (R-Ala.) in an e-mailed state­ment said news of the deal sent “a chill through the spine of mem­bers of Con­gress who care about NATO and Tur­key’s align­ment with the West.”

Tur­key, as a NATO mem­ber, is par­ti­cip­at­ing in the al­li­ance plan to build a bal­list­ic-mis­sile shield that would cov­er all NATO ter­rit­ory. While the United States is sup­ply­ing most of the crit­ic­al as­sets for the shield, oth­er mem­ber states are ex­pec­ted to aug­ment it by en­han­cing and inter-con­nect­ing their own do­mest­ic an­ti­mis­sile cap­ab­il­it­ies.

Ank­ara main­tains it has the sole right to de­cide which mis­sile-de­fense sys­tem to buy.

“It is def­in­itely, it’s go­ing to be na­tion­al cap­ab­il­ity first and fore­most, and it’s go­ing to be a na­tion­al de­cision,” Turk­ish For­eign Min­istry spokes­man Levent Gum­ruk­cu was quoted by Voice of Amer­ica as say­ing this week.

Ank­ara in­sists the FD-2000 would be fully in­ter­op­er­able with oth­er NATO an­ti­mis­sile as­sets and says it has made this a re­quire­ment of any deal with the CP­MIEC firm.

NATO Sec­ret­ary Gen­er­al An­ders Fogh Rasmussen on Monday said it was crit­ic­al that all mem­ber states’ na­tion­al mis­sile de­fenses be inter-op­er­able with one an­oth­er.

The U.S. State De­part­ment though, has already gone on re­cord as say­ing the FD-2000 “will not be inter-op­er­able with NATO sys­tems or col­lect­ive de­fense cap­ab­il­it­ies.”

“It is in no one’s in­terest that Tur­key choose a sys­tem … which could nev­er be in­teg­rated with the rest of NATO’s de­fense cap­ab­il­it­ies,” Ro­gers said. “In es­sence, Tur­key would be weak­en­ing it­self for little ap­par­ent gain.”

Even if the FD-2000 could be in­teg­rated with NATO as­sets, there are still the wor­ries in Con­gress that the soft­ware would be com­prom­ised by di­git­al back-doors cre­ated by Chinese de­velopers in­tent on gain­ing ac­cess to al­li­ance data.

“Since Tur­key is fully in­teg­rated in­to NATO’s mis­sile de­fense net­work, such as the NATO Air De­fense Ground En­vir­on­ment, we are con­cerned about the risk of third-coun­try ac­cess to NATO and U.S. clas­si­fied data and tech­no­logy,” reads the sen­at­ors’ let­ter to Hagel and Kerry.

The Turk­ish gov­ern­ment said it chose the Chinese sys­tem over oth­er an­ti­mis­sile sys­tems offered for sale by U.S., European and Rus­si­an man­u­fac­tur­ers be­cause at $3.4 bil­lion it is con­sid­er­ably less-ex­pens­ive and po­ten­tially could be co-pro­duced with Tur­key, al­low­ing for tech­no­logy trans­fer.

Should Ank­ara fi­nal­ize a de­vel­op­ment con­tract with the CP­MIEC firm, the sen­at­ors want the United States and NATO to con­sider ex­pelling Tur­key from the al­li­ance’s Air De­fense Ground En­vir­on­ment, through which the coun­try re­ceives con­sid­er­able fin­an­cial sup­port for its air-de­fense radars.

The U.S. State De­part­ment says mul­tiple seni­or of­fi­cials, in­clud­ing Kerry, have already voiced op­pos­i­tion to Ank­ara about the pos­sible deal with China.

“We have con­veyed our ser­i­ous con­cerns about the Turk­ish Gov­ern­ment’s con­tract dis­cus­sions with the U.S.-sanc­tioned com­pany for a mis­sile de­fense sys­tem that will not be in­ter­op­er­able with­in — with NATO sys­tems or col­lect­ive de­fense cap­ab­il­it­ies,” State De­part­ment spokes­wo­man Mar­ie Harf said at a Monday press brief­ing.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
16 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
17 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
18 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
21 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
22 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×