Search for Syrian Chemical Host Prompts Muted Global Response

Global Security Newswire Staff
See more stories about...
Global Security Newswire Staff
Oct. 11, 2013, 11:02 a.m.

The United States re­cently cour­ted coun­tries across Europe and the Middle East to po­ten­tially host Syr­i­an chem­ic­al-war­fare ma­ter­i­als or their rem­nants, but no na­tion made an im­me­di­ate, pub­lic leap for the op­por­tun­ity, For­eign Policy magazine re­por­ted on Thursday.

At least one plan calls for all but the dead­li­est ma­ter­i­als in the Syr­i­an gov­ern­ment’s chem­ic­al ar­sen­al to be elim­in­ated out­side the na­tion’s bor­ders. However, loc­a­tions for the planned de­struc­tion ef­fort re­mained un­clear, as did the ul­ti­mate des­tin­a­tions of its by-products.

A largely U.S.-led search for de­struc­tion as­sist­ance in­cluded con­tacts with Al­bania, Bel­gi­um, France and Rus­sia, which all have his­tor­ic­al ex­per­i­ence in des­troy­ing chem­ic­al-weapon stocks. U.S. of­fi­cials also reached out to Nor­way, which has no his­tory in deal­ing with such sub­stances.

One chem­ic­al-weapon ex­pert said he was “sur­prised” by the lat­ter in­quiry.

“The best op­tion is to des­troy the chem­ic­als and the pre­curs­ors on-site in Syr­ia. That would seem bet­ter than ap­proach­ing a coun­try like Nor­way,” said Paul Walk­er, in­ter­na­tion­al pro­gram dir­ect­or of the en­vir­on­ment­al se­cur­ity and sus­tain­ab­il­ity pro­gram of Green Cross and Glob­al Green.

The Syr­i­an gov­ern­ment ad­mit­ted pos­sess­ing chem­ic­al weapons and agreed to their de­struc­tion about a month ago, after an Au­gust nerve-gas at­tack promp­ted an im­me­di­ate threat of U.S. mil­it­ary in­ter­ven­tion in the coun­try’s civil war. The agree­ment kicked off a whirl­wind dis­arm­a­ment ef­fort res­ult­ing in Fri­day’s No­bel Peace Prize award to the in­ter­na­tion­al agency charged with count­ing and over­see­ing elim­in­a­tion of the Syr­i­an stocks.

An eight-month push to cor­ral and des­troy the arms will in­volve “ex­ceed­ingly com­plex se­cur­ity chal­lenges re­lated to en­sur­ing a safe op­er­at­ing en­vir­on­ment at de­struc­tion sites,” U.N. Sec­ret­ary Ban Ki-moon said in a Monday plan­ning doc­u­ment. The U.N. Se­cur­ity Coun­cil later signed off on the U.N. chief’s pro­pos­al, the As­so­ci­ated Press re­por­ted on Fri­day.

What equip­ment would des­troy the ma­ter­i­als also re­mains un­cer­tain. The U.S. De­fense De­part­ment on Tues­day de­scribed a re­cently de­veloped, port­able dis­pos­al sys­tem to the Or­gan­iz­a­tion for the Pro­hib­i­tion of Chem­ic­al Weapons, which has un­til Nov. 15 to settle on spe­cif­ic gear, Re­u­ters re­por­ted.

“This is very big busi­ness, very polit­ic­al, and sev­er­al gov­ern­ments are push­ing for it,” said Di­eter Roth­bach­er, a former OP­CW per­son­nel train­er.

A spasm of Thursday vi­ol­ence near a re­por­ted chem­ic­al-arms site un­der­scored se­cur­ity risks to the in­ter­na­tion­al dis­arm­a­ment ef­fort, the Wall Street Journ­al re­por­ted.

Back­ers of the Syr­i­an res­ist­ance said the stepped-up fight­ing took place near the Safira De­fense Factor­ies and Sci­entif­ic Re­search Fa­cil­it­ies. A num­ber of spe­cial­ists said the Safira in­stall­a­tion — a re­por­ted labor­at­ory and man­u­fac­tur­ing site — is among the coun­try’s most siz­able and cut­ting-edge.

Mo­scow, an ally of Syr­i­an Pres­id­ent Bashar As­sad, re­af­firmed its con­ten­tion that the op­pos­i­tion is en­gaged in chem­ic­al-war­fare activ­it­ies, state-run Rus­sia Today re­por­ted on Fri­day.

“Some re­ports in­dic­ate that [the] al-Nusra Front is plan­ning to smuggle tox­ic com­pounds and rel­ev­ant spe­cial­ists in­to Ir­aqi ter­rit­ory to stage ter­ror­ist at­tacks there this time,” Rus­si­an For­eign Min­is­ter Sergei Lav­rov said.

Lav­rov ad­ded that op­er­at­ives from out­side gov­ern­ments might have giv­en re­lated train­ing to Syr­i­an op­pos­i­tion fight­ers in tri­bal ter­rit­or­ies of Afgh­anistan. The Rus­si­an me­dia re­port did not identi­fy what coun­tries could have con­trib­uted.

What We're Following See More »
1.5 MILLION MORE TUNED IN FOR TRUMP
More People Watched Trump’s Acceptance Speech
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

Hillary Clinton hopes that television ratings for the candidates' acceptance speeches at their respective conventions aren't foreshadowing of similar results at the polls in November. Preliminary results from the networks and cable channels show that 34.9 million people tuned in for Donald Trump's acceptance speech while 33.3 million watched Clinton accept the Democratic nomination. However, it is still possible that the numbers are closer than these ratings suggest: the numbers don't include ratings from PBS or CSPAN, which tend to attract more Democratic viewers.

Source:
×