George W. Bush’s Close Call

His recent heart problems were far more dangerous than generally believed — potentially life-threatening, in fact.

Former President George W. Bush gives the coin toss before kickoff between the Texas Tech Red Raiders and the SMU Mustangs on August 30, 2013 at Gerald J. Ford Stadium in Dallas, Texas.
National Journal
Tom DeFrank
Oct. 11, 2013, 11:31 a.m.

George W. Bush’s re­cent heart prob­lems were far more dan­ger­ous than gen­er­ally be­lieved — po­ten­tially life-threat­en­ing, in fact.

Sources fa­mil­i­ar with the former pres­id­ent’s med­ic­al situ­ation told Na­tion­al Journ­al that a ma­jor block­age in a coron­ary artery dis­covered dur­ing Bush’s an­nu­al phys­ic­al ex­am in Au­gust had al­most com­pletely shut off blood flow to one of his heart cham­bers.

“He was more than 95% oc­cluded,” an au­thor­it­at­ive source said. “With a block­age like that in a main artery you’re sup­posed to die. He was pretty lucky they caught it.”

Dr. Jonath­an Rein­er, an in­ter­ven­tion­al car­di­olo­gist at George Wash­ing­ton Uni­versity who has treated former Vice Pres­id­ent Dick Cheney but was not in­volved in Bush’s care, noted that a block­age of that mag­nitude wouldn’t ne­ces­sar­ily be fatal in all pa­tients but is a very ser­i­ous situ­ation re­quir­ing prompt treat­ment.

“Every case is dif­fer­ent,” Rein­ert said. “It de­pends on sev­er­al factors, in­clud­ing how quickly a block­age has de­veloped. But it’s a very im­port­ant ves­sel. If you oc­clude that par­tic­u­lar artery it can kill you.”

A prom­in­ent in­tern­ist who asked not to be iden­ti­fied ad­ded that Bush’s block­age, if un­dia­gnosed, would al­most cer­tainly have risked “a grave car­di­ac event.”

Even with a 95 per­cent block­age, Rein­er said, blood will still be flow­ing through the im­paired artery, but the heart muscle must work harder, par­tic­u­larly dur­ing vig­or­ous activ­ity. The ad­ded strain when blood flow is di­min­ished can lead to ser­i­ous car­di­ac com­plic­a­tions, in­clud­ing a heart at­tack.

The 43rd pres­id­ent has ex­er­cised reg­u­larly for years and is gen­er­ally be­lieved to be in ex­cel­lent health. Nev­er­the­less, a stress test that’s stand­ard with all phys­ic­als at the renowned Cooper Clin­ic in Dal­las turned up wor­ri­some changes to Bush’s elec­tro­car­di­o­gram read­ings. His phys­i­cians quickly ordered up a CT an­giogram that re­vealed the mag­nitude of the block­age and promp­ted them to re­com­mend in­sert­ing a stent to open the artery. That pro­ced­ure was done the next morn­ing at Texas Health Pres­by­teri­an Hos­pit­al without com­plic­a­tion. Bush spent the night at the hos­pit­al for ob­ser­va­tion and is re­por­ted to be re­cov­er­ing nor­mally.

At the time some phys­i­cians wondered wheth­er the stent was med­ic­al overkill, giv­en that Bush has no known fam­ily his­tory of heart dis­ease and is in good shape. Mul­tiple sources know­ledge­able about Bush’s con­di­tion, however, said there’s no ques­tion the treat­ment was med­ic­ally ne­ces­sary.

A spokes­man for the Cooper Clin­ic de­clined to dis­cuss any as­pects of Bush’s care, cit­ing pa­tient pri­vacy. Bush spokes­man Freddy Ford also de­clined com­ment.

By all ap­pear­ances, the ex-pres­id­ent has bounced back smartly from his health scare. He’s been cleared to travel, at­tend­ing the Pres­id­ent’s Cup golf matches in Ohio last week­end. He’s also re­turned to play­ing golf and rid­ing moun­tain bikes, but doc­tors have put lim­its on his nor­mally-man­ic speeds and the dur­a­tion of his workouts.

“He’s back on the bike — easy, not hard,” a friend said. “But he’s feel­ing ter­rif­ic and do­ing fine.”

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
6 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
7 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×