Oil executive Harold Hamm, who made billions tapping the vast Bakken oil field in North Dakota before other companies saw the potential, sounded a pessimistic tone about whether the industry will develop California’s Monterey Shale formation, which is estimated to have possibly five times more oil.
“It’s just been tough to break the code on how to get that,” said Hamm, founder and CEO of Continental Resources, an independent oil company with the largest footprint in the Bakken oil fields in Western North Dakota. “Everybody thought they could and it hasn’t worked out.”
He added that the field, which is located in the San Joaquin Valley in central California, has not yet matured to a form that companies could develop with today’s technologies.
Speaking at a dinner Wednesday night in Washington with media reporters and other independent-petroleum executives, Hamm said his company had considered pursuing the Monterey formation.
“We went there and thought it might have a lot of potential,” Hamm said. “I’d be out there, but I just can’t do anything different than some of the people who have already been there and made that attempt.”
The oil industry’s potential pursuit of the Monterey shale formation has triggered an intense debate over hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, in California, a drilling technique that’s helped unlock vast reserves of oil and natural gas around the country, including in North Dakota. But it’s controversial for the environmental risks associated with it, including water contamination.
Last month, California’s Democratic Gov. Jerry Brown passed a law regulating fracking.
Called a “pioneer” by Interior Secretary Sally Jewell this summer for his early insight into the oil industry’s potential in North Dakota, Hamm’s glum outlook for the Monterey doesn’t bode well for producers looking to tap into it.
“I don’t see — ” Hamm stopped mid-sentence and recast what he said: “It’s yet to be seen”¦It might have a lot of potential, but there are reasons why it’s not being produced.”
What We're Following See More »
"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”
The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.
President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."
Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.