Republicans will cave, the White House will win, the government will re-open, and the debt ceiling will be raised. These things are going to happen, just before or soon after the government hits its borrowing limit ““ and at that point, President Obama faces a decision.
Do I leverage my victory into a budget deal, eliminating both a long-term national threat and the main source of partisan bickering?
Or do I rub salt into the GOP’s self-inflicted wounds in the distant hope of winning the House in 2014?
Govern or campaign? Unite or divide? Lead or lay into the GOP?
Obama’s choice may be revealed in the way he approaches immigration reform, which he curiously declared Tuesday to be his top priority after the fiscal crisis.
“Once that’s done, you know, the day after, I’m going to be pushing to say, call a vote on immigration reform,” Obama told the Los Angeles affiliate of Spanish-language television network Univision.
It’s an interesting choice, given the national debt is an existential national problem and the crux of the role-of-government debate that has tied Washington in knots for years. Does Obama really think immigration is a more serious problem? Or is it merely the best political issue for Democrats?
It is tempting to assume the worse, especially as Obama is modeling his immigration message on his fiscal-crisis talking points. Blaming House Speaker John Boehner for preventing immigration from coming up for a vote in the past, Obama said, “The only thing right now that’s holding it back is, again, Speaker Boehner not willing to call the bill on the floor of the House of Representatives.”
Make no mistake, Republicans are on the wrong side of the immigration debate, as measured by the 2012 election results and the nation’s shifting demography. The GOP also engineered the fiscal crisis, and Boehner is a tragically weak speaker.
But most voters would be disappointed if they learn that their president has abandoned governance and the hard work of dealing with a fractured GOP to engage in an all-or-nothing bid for the House. While the White House and Congress stumble to an agreement, the great unknown is Obama’s second act. Will he be more presidential than political? Or will raw politics define his presidency?
What We're Following See More »
The national polls, once again, tell very different stories: Clinton leads by just one point in the IBD, Rasmussen, and LA Times tracking polls, while she shows a commanding 12 point lead in the ABC news poll and a smaller but sizable five point lead in the CNN poll. The Republican Remington Research Group released a slew of polls showing Trump up in Ohio, Nevada, and North Carolina, a tie in Florida, and Clinton leads in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Virginia. However, an independent Siena poll shows Clinton up 7 in North Carolina, while a Monmouth poll shows Trump up one in Arizona
Since the release of the Access Hollywood tape, on which Donald Trump boasted of sexually assaulting women, "Senate Republicans have seen their fortunes dip, particularly in states like Florida, North Carolina, New Hampshire, Nevada and Pennsylvania," where Hillary Clinton now leads. Jennifer Duffy writes that she now expects Democrats to gain five to seven seats—enough to regain control of the chamber.
"Of the Senate seats in the Toss Up column, Trump only leads in Indiana and Missouri where both Republicans are running a few points behind him. ... History shows that races in the Toss Up column never split down the middle; one party tends to win the lion’s share of them."
"Some Republicans are running so far away from their party’s nominee that they are threatening to sue TV stations for running ads that suggest they support Donald Trump. Just two weeks before Election Day, five Republicans―Reps. Bob Dold (R-Ill.), Mike Coffman (R-Colo.), David Jolly (R-Fla.), John Katko (R-N.Y.) and Brian Fitzpatrick, a Pennsylvania Republican running for an open seat that’s currently occupied by his brother―contend that certain commercials paid for by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee provide false or misleading information by connecting them to the GOP nominee. Trump is so terrible, these Republicans are essentially arguing, that tying them to him amounts to defamation."
Former Illinois GOP Congressman Aaron Schock "recently agreed to pay a $10,000 fine for making an excessive solicitation for a super PAC that was active in his home state of Illinois four years ago." Schock resigned from Congress after a story about his Downton Abbey-themed congressional office raised questions about how he was using taxpayer dollars.