Members of Congress seemed to channel Coldplay Wednesday during a House hearing on the shutdown’s effects. “Nobody said it was easy,” went the Democratic message. Countered Republicans: “No one ever said it would be this hard.”
At issue were public land closures by the National Park Service that Republicans have described as politically motivated. Even the name of the hearing — “As Difficult As Possible” — carried the GOP message of unnecessary hardship caused by NPS decisions. The joint hearing was convened by the Natural Resources Committee and the Oversight and Government Reform Committee.
“The Park Service “¦ [should] never allow itself to be subjected to political influence,” said House Oversight and Government Reform Chairman Darrell Issa, R-Calif. “Yet it appears today the Park Service leadership is no longer living up to that mandate.”
NPS Director Jonathan Jarvis had the unenviable task of responding to Issa and others who demanded answers for a host of the agency’s specific closures. He defended them as necessary under shutdown procedure, declining to wade into the political blame game over who is responsible for the shutdown. Perhaps that’s because Democrats did it for him.
“We’re 15 days into a government shutdown, and now Republicans want to investigate why the government is shut down,” said Natural Resources Committee ranking member Peter DeFazio of Oregon. Other Democrats asked Republicans what they expected would happen when they shut down the government, but DeFazio took it a step further. “I will demonstrate who’s responsible,” he said, holding up a mirror to face his GOP colleagues.
Jarvis said the Park Service gave no orders, nor received any from the White House, to make shutdown closures intentionally painful or visible. Much-critiqued closures of monuments such as the World War II Memorial were not without reason, he said. “There’s a lot of talk about open-air memorials that are unmanned,” he said. “They are not unoccupied. My responsibility is to keep them protected 24 hours a day.”¦ It pains us to not be able to invite the American public into their national parks.”
Some Democrats pointed to the green paint splattered on the Lincoln Memorial this summer, saying such incidents could escalate if monuments were left open with no NPS rangers to provide security.
That didn’t satisfy Republicans, who said earlier government shutdowns did not inflict such painful consequences. Former NPS Deputy Director Denis Galvin called that selective memory. “Yes, Lincoln and Jefferson were barricaded,” he said. “The much-discussed World War II Memorial did not exist then, but if it had, I think we would have barricaded it.”
Jarvis also pushed back on news reports that quoted a ranger who said NPS employees were instructed to make closures painful. “I have no idea where that information came from. That’s hearsay,” he said. “I’m in communication with my employees — the ones who are still at work — and they do not believe that.”
Keeping the parks open, Jarvis said, would have been a violation of the Antideficiency Act, which prevents operations without appropriated funding. Rep. Rob Bishop, R-Utah, responded that erecting barricades “created a new obligation with no new threat,” itself a violation of the act.
Oversight Committee ranking member Elijah Cummings, D-Md., lamented that arguments over the World War II Memorial distracted from serious shutdown problems, like delayed veterans’ benefits. Other Democrats were more than content to mock the GOP for its outrage over the park closures. “Blaming the National Park Service for the closure of the parks is like voting for capital punishment and then blaming the hangman,” said Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton, D-D.C.
- 1 The Net Has Never Been ‘Neutral’
- 2 Congress Says NIH Should Have Spent Money on Ebola Instead of Puppet Shows and Rabbit Massages
- 3 Obama’s ‘Privacy Bill of Rights’ Gets Bashed from All Sides
- 4 Army Lt. Gen. Sean MacFarland to Lead U.S. Fight Against ISIS
- 5 The Forgotten, Radical Martin Luther King Jr.
What We're Following See More »
President Obama became a surprise topic of contention toward the end of the Democratic debate, as Hillary Clinton reminded viewers that Sanders had challenged the progressive bona fides of President Obama in 2011 and suggested that someone might challenge him from the left. “The kind of criticism that we’ve heard from Senator Sanders about our president I expect from Republicans, I do not expect from someone running for the Democratic nomination to succeed President Obama,” she said. “Madame Secretary, that is a low blow,” replied Sanders, before getting in another dig during his closing statement: “One of us ran against Barack Obama. I was not that candidate.”
It’s all about the 1% and Wall Street versus everyone else for Bernie Sanders—even when he’s talking about race relations. Like Hillary Clinton, he needs to appeal to African-American and Hispanic voters in coming states, but he insists on doing so through his lens of class warfare. When he got a question from the moderators about the plight of black America, he noted that during the great recession, African Americans “lost half their wealth,” and “instead of tax breaks for billionaires,” a Sanders presidency would deliver jobs for kids. On the very next question, he downplayed the role of race in inequality, saying, “It’s a racial issue, but it’s also a general economic issue.”
It’s been said in just about every news story since New Hampshire: the primaries are headed to states where Hillary Clinton will do well among minority voters. Leaving nothing to chance, she underscored that point in her opening statement in the Milwaukee debate tonight, saying more needs to be done to help “African Americans who face discrimination in the job market” and immigrant families. She also made an explicit reference to “equal pay for women’s work.” Those boxes she’s checking are no coincidence: if she wins women, blacks and Hispanics, she wins the nomination.
Under pressure from a judge, the State Department will release about 550 of Hillary Clinton’s emails—“roughly 14 percent of the 3,700 remaining Clinton emails—on Saturday, in the middle of the Presidents Day holiday weekend.” All of the emails were supposed to have been released last month. Related: State subpoenaed the Clinton Foundation last year, which brings the total number of current Clinton investigations to four, says the Daily Caller.